I think harbleu dropped 7 times playing med in hl once and still won iirc

My team dreams ain't looking too hot so I figured I'd see if anyone needs a demo in invite though I'm not sure if anyone does

Would also love to be a package deal with phantom on med if anyone wants to build a team with both of us but we are also both looking separately

And finally I am still ALSO trying to do the team leader machinations but they are looking less likely

God bless and have a wonderful day friends

only join if you are prepared to battle both the advanced division and Vatican II at the same time

the surgery was to open his third eye

my two favorite games are lauge of legends and lol

that's what they all say

Or 6 years from now (assuming game is still alive), when you're making your lft, you'll have to spend time saying 'I was 14, please don't hold it against me, I'm reformed!'

hey man, I'm speaking from experience here

The trick is to complain to your mom that tftv doesn't like you instead of to tftv

I used to enjoy yukon in comp, I'm pretty sure it'd be a disaster now but hey it was fun then

I was also the sicko who enjoyed gravelpit

I agree, for three main reasons:

1) Because invite is the 'face of the league', having cheaters there is just more harmful to the image of the scene, and therefore more urgent to deal with. It's the same reason why it's understandable for professionalism requirements (aliases, generally being respectful, etc) to be enforced as well; it's a two-way street.

2) In light of point 1, the RGL admins SHOULD have a more direct relationship with invite players already, and often do.

3) Frankly, I think cheaters in higher divs are as much better at disguising their cheats as players in higher divs are at playing the game. That's why you hear lots of suspicion about invite players but not as much blatant evidence. Even borderline invite/advanced cases like mxr and elijah were still less blatant to my eyes than some of the lower div cheaters we've seen. Like the most recent OMG thread, idk maybe it's just me, but I feel like that's a much quicker report to put together than one for the higher divs.

cs has money

I'll keep it a hundred with you, because a lot of people seem to facetiously egg you on at times. You haven't really demonstrated an ability to string well-written and coherent sentences together, nor the inclination to discuss storylines that do not entirely revolve around yourself. If you can grow in those areas, maybe RGL or tftv would let you write news articles for them.

I've heard this line of logic before:

Can we talk about how dumb it is for a second? The only way for the above to ever happen is if

1) there is a public witch hunt for a certain player

2) that player IS, in fact, cheating

You're saying that people posting public evidence that looks incredibly suspicious will lead to these players covering their tracks, and that this actually HAS made the process take longer. Meaning the witch hunt was correct AND that it was evidence of that level of suspicion that led to the ban in the end (if it was more blatant stuff, it doesn't make sense for the investigation to have slowed down by less blatant stuff being public). So then, the public should get more credit?

Putting aside the argument that having to be 100% certain is a little silly, how can you get from 99% to 100% if no new evidence is coming out? The AC people just rewatch the old stuff and change their mind? This is starting to sound a lot less rigorous and quantifiable.

Also, doesn't the point about 'allowing the suspicions to calm down' contradict the idea that public outrage has no effect on the speed of the process?

Honestly, it sounds like RGL is just running through the beats of what they're 'supposed' to say to defend their AC process without thinking through the implications. Please enlighten me if I am wrong about any of my assumptions here.