Caps has chosen one of his six paths towards becoming a part of team avatar.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198073536735 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:113271007] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:56635503 |
Country | France |
Signed Up | July 19, 2015 |
Last Posted | July 29, 2024 at 9:39 PM |
Posts | 575 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
Ok so none of this actually makes sense. RGL is banning lolguy for saying this in a scrim, and yet:
As we do with shorter ban lengths during the off season, this will have a delayed start and the ban will not begin until May 18th, the day before the start of the sixes season. If we ban a player and a majority of the ban is during the off season, then the ban was essentially fruitless, since it did not affect the player at all. We delay bans that are shorter during off seasons, to make sure that the player does see real consequences to the actions they chose to take.
So is the scrim part of RGL, or isn't it??
If you can be banned for this kind of behavior in a scrim, that implies the scrim has a connection to RGL, and therefore, the ban should start immediately, effectively banning lolguy from playing tf2 on servers with "organized RGL teams", as I guess that's the connection to RGL.
OR
The scrim is not a part of RGL, and this is why the ban is delayed. But if this is the case, then why is he banned?
Either scrims are part of RGL or they aren't, you can't have it both ways. And I'm not even going to get into how dumb it is to be banned for this reason, particularly when I'd be willing to bet every single player in that server has said the exact same thing at some point, or worse, and none of them are banned.
Unban him, and while your at it, unban that poor guy who rang for HL grand finals and got banned because he happened to be the unlucky guy available to ring for a team who had decided to throw. What was he supposed to do? Disconnect when he realized they were going to throw? You probably would have banned him for "poor sportsmanship" or something equally absurd for that, so he was damned if he did, and damned if he didn't. RGL needs to make its process very clear, and get some competency while doing so.
why did you put LFP in walrex's place?
exile why did you remove me?
End of season bumperino
Don't tell Tery but Frick is on Demo
(Sorry Makka)
I am bob's friend, just not the one being talked about by him here
very fun to play with, also is an actual monster at scout
Glop and maelstrahm = team is nuts
Would love to try and qualify, been really enjoying playing again now that im not on the laptop lmao.
Roamer >Pocket
Add me if you're interested
https://steamcommunity.com/id/Alexandrostf2/
As a current player in the RGL sixes advanced league I would like an explanation as to why exactly these penalties were issued. It seems to me that no rules were broken here. The rules state "You must have at least 6 players on your team in order to start the match. If you do not ready up in time, we will get a forfeit." It seems there were 6 players to start the match, and they simply didn't pause when only one player could continue playing. Stock won the only round of the match http://logs.tf/2379863#76561198100734688
The other players appearing on the stock team are not members of his team, and given that 2 of them are alt accounts, and one is crab_f, a friend and rostered player of the Jelqup Returns, it seems reasonable to infer the 2 alt accounts are also friends of the team, and it could therefore be argued that they were interfering with the Rangettes. In which case Jelqup Returns is the team in need of penalties.
So I would greatly appreciate an explanation as to how exactly the Rangettes broke the rules, because as far as I can see, the only team who broke rules is the Returns squad.