i use this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCjyiEOZP44

8))

missed ya ;_;

http://i.imgur.com/f6f7eGP.jpg

going to use this, it looks sick!
good job

now we're just pointing out stuff, just to be a bitch.. it's just a figure of speech..
i even stated that the lowest you should go is 25%, so there i already set the bar, therefor not needing to state that i do not only mean 1-2% but actually 1-24% ish percent..

but i don't feel like discussing literally worthless shit, so let's end this now? :)

yeah, i render at 25 fps. (gonna render at 30 fps from now on, now that i know it dosen't compress 25)

i tend to track in nuke.
haven't ever used a better tracker than the one in nuke

haven't heard about that, sounds cool though..
gonna look it up some time soon.
thought i am a after effects man, and i have some plugins which blends quite good as well, but if it does it better, i thank you for the suggestion

well that's i can understand.
i am going by the mindset that he has everything layed out.

also, if you have the hard drive space for 420 fps files.. by all means record at that.
i just know that a lot of people aren't sitting around with 2 terabytes ssd's

like you can never argue against 420 > 120 fps..

I'm just saying if you aren't doing anything crazy, there is no reason to smash your hard drive with frame stacks :)

fair enough, i just heard that when you upload va the euro youtube it compresses 25.. iunno, got no source on that..
doesn't make the big difference Anyways :p

yea you could do that, though i asume that he wants to record all of the clips at the same fps.

never said that, i said that you wont need more than 120 FPs unless you are slowing down to 1-2%

the standard fps for european video productions is 25 fps(the NA is 30)

so if you wanna slow down 50%
you still have over double of the frame rate that is going to be showed,
it should run smooth as hell at around 25%
thought that is pretty much the lowest you can go without dropping frames.

and i figured that i haven't seen anyone use anything that slow.

even thought you render an amazing video with a high fps, YouTube is still going to use their own compression codec wich runs at 25 fps, so the rest of the frames litterally goes to waste.

also, i dont know why you care, but i work at something called:
Mayday film.
i am currently an intern..
and i have been going to school with video editing for 3 years now.

i actually work with video production.

the usual workflow for "montage" jobs usually goes a little like this:

1)find your song
2)lisint to this song until you hate it(so you know how the flow of it goes ect)
3)get all your clips compressed, and ready to import (no reason to break your editing workflow wit stupid things like compressing)
4)edit your stuff
5)send it to other people that has no clue of editing what so ever(as that is the closest to the actual consumer(you can always get a "prof" opinion on it after))
6) color grading
7) fix the music and sound effects levels
8) render
9) feel gooooooooood

also, record at max 120 fps(there is no reason to rape your hard drive with high fps files.. as you LITERALLY wont see a difference unless you slow down to around... 1-2 %

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JET6m7CNRsk&feature=c4-overview&list=UUd8_jzNkTGmCwl2PkBp2fVQ
first try at editing.
took me around 1½-2 hours to make this thing..
enjoy

i forgot yesterday... but i just want to say a big thank you to all of the people who donated/watched

it was funny(well the parts i remember) and it all goes to a great cause

now.. i gotta get back to nursing my hangover.

bye

maple story