If you and a significant amount of others are unhappy with your party, why would you continue to align yourself with them? In this case, your party isn't aligned by ideology but through opposition so its already essentially broken. Teddy Roosevelt broke up the Republican vote and allowed Woodrow Wilson to win, but the party was able to realign itself under Harding.

Little known fact, If a third party gets over 5 percent of the popular vote, they’re eligible for public funding in the next election cycle.
If you want to break the two party system the first step is to have a third party reach this threshold and theyll be able to gain more funding the next election cycle, which means they'll have a larger reach and over time become a major faction. While for the most part, with a few exceptions(Teddy Roosevelt and Bull Moose) we have had two major factions, but these factions have changed over time.

3 of these things are not like the other.

1. Hitler's writings were highly anti-Semitic and anti-capitalistic. Look at The ‘Gemlich letter' one of the earliest pieces of Hitler's writings that still survive.

2. Falangism(Franco), originally was highly anti-capitalistic but adopted pseudo-capitalism under a command economy in order to take full advantage of their neutrality in the second world war and to repair the country from the recent civil war.

3. Mussolini had "state capitalism" which is just another version of command economy.

The economics of fascism is a difficult field of study, but I would definitely not call them capitalist in the traditional sense.

Your posts gave me cancer

Would you rather send your child to a Tf2 LAN or Micheal Jackson's Never Ranch back in the 90s?

Neetbucks