justjazzA team wanting to stay in a lower division is "selfish" only if you assume they owe their absence to other teams in that division. They don't.
I have a lot more general thoughts on this conversation as it's progressed that I'll share at a later date, but I can't let this stand as it is right now: Yes, they literally do. That is the premise of skill-divisions. That good teams move up in order to provide less skilled teams with a meaningfully competitive environment for them to compete, develop, and have fun in. The opposite case (that lower level teams are somehow acting selfishly entitled to "an easier path without the challenge") is not equivalent because we all signed up for a league with skill-based divisions. It's not unreasonable as a lower-level team to expect that that is the outcome. Which I would frankly have a hard time believing that you disagree with, so it's obvious that we're not talking about absolute moral truth here, we're having a nuanced discussion about the degree to which a team is being selfish at the expense of the rest of the league's experience, and when it becomes worthwhile for the league to intervene.
If you believe that a sandbagging team should never have to move up, or even offclass, as long as they never win the division, then I can get where you're coming from. I disagree, but I can see the argument. We're letting a few players stagnate for the good of the rest of the league. I would personally worry about the competitive integrity of any playoffs matches that those teams make it to, but as long as the rest of the game is in a good state and the top level of the scene isn't getting choked out of existence by thinning competition at higher divisions, I don't really have a problem with letting teams sandbag within reason. If that were the case though, I would probably support efforts to reduce sandbagging, and lament any growing pains that happen as a result of these new policies as unfortunate but fixable.
Except that, obviously, that is what's happening, that is what RGL's doing, and that's what we're talking about. I think that the game is struggling for a lot more reasons that just sandbagging, obviously, but I just find this question of 'moralizing' outcomes to be a little silly when all that's happening is people expecting the outcomes they were promised. Maybe they get a little overzealous, which is something to talk about, but this should be a conversation about nuanced solutions, rather than categorical dismissals based on faulty logic. Food for thought.
And on this point more quickly:
justjazzDevelopmentally, league play isn't just an organized scrim. It's a fundamentally different competitive environment. Matches have stakes: results are recorded, your season is on the line, you have to show up prepared and actually execute. That pressure itself is an overload that drives a player's adaptation in ways a scrim can't. If "just scrim" was a real answer, then why have a league at all? Why not everyone just scrim?
This is a fantastic point if we're talking about teams that are trying to grow and improve, but we're not, we're talking about sandbagging teams that are playing artificially below their skill level. They are explicitly, definitionally, avoiding being overloaded and forced to adapt to new challenges by playing in a div below what they're capable of. The point of saying that they can just scrim, is that if they want to play artificially below a level they're capable of competing at, for whatever reason, they can do that in scrims just fine, and actually even still provide the overload that forces less skilled players to adapt & improve. Perhaps to a lesser degree than in an official match, but any less skilled team with a serious improvement mindset is going to be able to get a lot, sometimes just as much if not more, out of merely scrimming better teams (speaking from personal experience).
--
And finally to be clear: I am explicitly NOT talking about the millie team/situation here. They are literally not sandbagging, by definition. They are NOT trying to play at a level artificially below what they're capable of. They ARE trying to play at a level appropriate for them and being caught in an unfortunate loophole in the rules that should be fixed. Absolutely no shade to millie & tree, you guys are both excellent members of the community, losing your participation would be a loss to us all, and I hope this decision is changed so that you can play. BUT I don't think that centering this discussion about sandbagging on a team that is obviously not sandbagging is fruitful at this point. I honestly think that a big part of why this discussion has been so frustrating is because the 'pro-sandbagging' side keeps pointing to a team that is obviously not even sandbagging as a confounding point that is unaddressed by arguments meant to address actual sandbagging. Which is by design because, again, millie & tree are not sandbagging.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk. These will not be my final words on this matter.