http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tPcDC7uWgE
this was kinda neat
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198000425294 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:40159566] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:20079783 |
Country | Canada |
Signed Up | October 1, 2012 |
Last Posted | September 21, 2016 at 3:40 PM |
Posts | 417 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 1.35 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
800 |
Resolution |
1650x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
120hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | G402 |
Keyboard | CM storm Quickfire |
Mousepad | Puretrak Talent |
Headphones | ATH-AD700's |
Monitor | ViewSonic VX2268WM |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tPcDC7uWgE
this was kinda neat
rbI have some free time the next couple days; add me if you want to go over some things.
g00d jok3 ryan.
thanks man this is really helpful.
HE IS BIG FUCK HE IS MVP
kevyou can't miss a chance to play with THE reimu(featured in all the mountain dew™ sponsored frag vids)
testify is cool too
Not just cool, ... ice cold oh baby.
Need a Roamer still!!! D:
Please contact me , Freddy , Reimu or Bomb.
Steam links in our profiles. :D
TheFragilekillemdeaderI understand, but players, as well as teams, are hesitant to make the commitment of time and money to ESEA when they know that a large portion of their matches won't be close. People play to have fun, and when they start losing badly, it's really easy for teams to fall apart. Unless there is a viable way to seed teams before the season starts, ESEA isn't going to attract the UGC crowd.
What's the point of seeding teams in a league so that the best teams play the best teams and the worst teams play the worst teams? Technically, proper seeding would have it so that the worst team plays the best team in week 1, but that's going against what you're saying. Even more technically, shouldn't proper seeding only have the need of having a tournament, because isn't the point of a league is to properly seed the best teams for playoffs? The whole idea of a season transitioning into playoffs is that ideally the top X amount of teams are the best teams, not half of the best teams and half of the decent teams.
I'm not sure with the whole argument of "people play for fun, so when teams start losing badly, they fall apart." I'm pretty sure teams falling apart because they lose happens at any level of practically any game, and the people who stick together and actually care about getting better will get better (ie: eMg). Also, the thought of "I only have fun when I win, so if I'm not winning, then I don't want to play anymore" sounds like someone who is too lazy to improve and wants all the right cards to be dealt for them. If someone has this mindset, then fine. However, having this mindset does not mean you have the right to complain about ESEA not giving you a golden schedule that makes your team go 14-2, when realistically you're on a team that should be going 5-11 and needs improvement.
fuck.
it's personal preference.
Some may argue it's better to have them off though since the rockets come out of the center of your crosshair.
goodnight sweet prince nixnyte
fosterDid a specialist ever resolve your issue?
g00d j0k3
I knew what you meant.
Its just awkward wording saying that right after the RoT comment, should have added after gully week to the end of the sentence for clarification.
Reign of Terror presents the team's first real obstacle of the season, but they should be able to come out of it with a win and a 6-0 start to the season.
wut
http://www.mediafire.com/?py71ap7g0z80b4v
around tick 129000
http://play.esea.net/index.php?s=stats&d=match&id=3128417
testify
scout
open