162 avg
tfw people complain about 250ms
177ms average
Gonna consistently do this though to try see how low I can go
Best score I got was 64ms, but I guess it was a bit of a pre-click
Gonna consistently do this though to try see how low I can go
Best score I got was 64ms, but I guess it was a bit of a pre-click
with g303 144
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
Mukhtar1with g303 144
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/
They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms
A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf[/quote]
the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/
They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms
[quote] A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.[/quote]
ComangliaMukhtar1with g303 144
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/
They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms
A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.
the leaf-crumbling sound it makes for the sheep dashing is very quiet and i've honestly never even noticed, but maybe that's why i have a similar avg on the two games
trying to listen to it now but i think it's slightly delayed, starts after the sheep has already crossed the first vertical line marker thing
anyway, having super amazing benchmark reaction time isn't going to give you a considerable advantage compared to a guy with barely avg rt in-game. tf2 is a game of how fast you can move your hands and how well you can keep track of everyone around you to dodge spam in a midfight etc
with abyssus 165
imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf[/quote]
the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/
They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms
[quote] A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.[/quote][/quote]
the leaf-crumbling sound it makes for the sheep dashing is very quiet and i've honestly never even noticed, but maybe that's why i have a similar avg on the two games
trying to listen to it now but i think it's slightly delayed, starts after the sheep has already crossed the first vertical line marker thing
anyway, having super amazing benchmark reaction time isn't going to give you a considerable advantage compared to a guy with barely avg rt in-game. tf2 is a game of how fast you can move your hands and how well you can keep track of everyone around you to dodge spam in a midfight etc
I found putting my eyes closer to the screen got me my best results, may be placebo though.