Upvote Upvoted 8 Downvote Downvoted
1 2 3 4
Reaction time
posted in Off Topic
91
#91
0 Frags +

162 avg

162 avg
92
#92
-1 Frags +

205 avg
95 highest

205 avg
95 highest
93
#93
-1 Frags +

3 year necro
sick

3 year necro
sick
94
#94
0 Frags +

214 average, 183 fastest

214 average, 183 fastest
95
#95
6 Frags +

tfw people complain about 250ms

http://i.imgur.com/B82GVNZ.png

tfw people complain about 250ms[img]http://i.imgur.com/B82GVNZ.png[/img]
96
#96
-2 Frags +

I pre-klicked and got 33 ms

I pre-klicked and got 33 ms
97
#97
0 Frags +

177ms average

Gonna consistently do this though to try see how low I can go

Best score I got was 64ms, but I guess it was a bit of a pre-click

177ms average

Gonna consistently do this though to try see how low I can go

Best score I got was 64ms, but I guess it was a bit of a pre-click
98
#98
0 Frags +

with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf

with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
99
#99
0 Frags +

144hz monitor and a g402 gets me a avg 197

144hz monitor and a g402 gets me a avg 197
100
#100
0 Frags +
Mukhtar1with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf

the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/

They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms

A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.
[quote=Mukhtar1]with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf[/quote]

the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/

They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms

[quote] A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.[/quote]
101
#101
0 Frags +
ComangliaMukhtar1with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf

the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/

They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms
A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.

the leaf-crumbling sound it makes for the sheep dashing is very quiet and i've honestly never even noticed, but maybe that's why i have a similar avg on the two games

trying to listen to it now but i think it's slightly delayed, starts after the sheep has already crossed the first vertical line marker thing

anyway, having super amazing benchmark reaction time isn't going to give you a considerable advantage compared to a guy with barely avg rt in-game. tf2 is a game of how fast you can move your hands and how well you can keep track of everyone around you to dodge spam in a midfight etc

[quote=Comanglia][quote=Mukhtar1]with g303 144
with abyssus 165

imo ship dash is alot better and less nerve-racking if you get anxious waiting for the green http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf[/quote]

the problem with the sheep dash ones is that it you can react to a sheep moving based off the sounds which auditory reaction time is significantly faster than visual reaction time.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456887/

They measured visual reaction time at around 180-200ms while auditory reaction time is 140-160ms

[quote] A study was carried out by Thompson et al.[9] has documented that the mean RT to detect visual stimuli is approximately 180–200 ms, whereas for sound it is around 140–160 ms. Researches by Kemp[10] show that an auditory stimulus takes only 8–10 ms to reach the brain, but on the other hand, a visual stimulus takes 20-40 ms. Therefore, since the auditory stimulus reaches the cortex faster than the visual stimulus, the ART is faster than the VRT.[/quote][/quote]

the leaf-crumbling sound it makes for the sheep dashing is very quiet and i've honestly never even noticed, but maybe that's why i have a similar avg on the two games

trying to listen to it now but i think it's slightly delayed, starts after the sheep has already crossed the first vertical line marker thing

anyway, having super amazing benchmark reaction time isn't going to give you a considerable advantage compared to a guy with barely avg rt in-game. tf2 is a game of how fast you can move your hands and how well you can keep track of everyone around you to dodge spam in a midfight etc
102
#102
0 Frags +

178 avg with 60 hz

178 avg with 60 hz
103
#103
0 Frags +

I found putting my eyes closer to the screen got me my best results, may be placebo though.

I found putting my eyes closer to the screen got me my best results, may be placebo though.
104
#104
-1 Frags +

227avg
ninox aurora
144hz

edit: put aurora back into usb 3.0 (forgot before) and got 201avg, not sure if that was the factor tho

227avg
ninox aurora
144hz

edit: put aurora back into usb 3.0 (forgot before) and got 201avg, not sure if that was the factor tho
1 2 3 4
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.