| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198016661425 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:56395697] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:28197848 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | September 1, 2012 |
| Last Posted | December 14, 2017 at 1:59 PM |
| Posts | 1182 (0.3 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
Also if dancenumber reads this post I'm not blaming you for the people you're working with being really dumb.
But if you don't take steps to stop someone who intentionally tries to make games terrible so that he can abuse the terrible report abuse system against legitimate players then you're also to blame.
The fact that a guy is taking the time to DDoS your site just to try to ban Brightly should tell you two things TF2C:
1. Get some DDoS protection
2. Ban Brightly.
Though after reading a thread where a guy complaining about him going full time engy as med was ignored because you thought it was advancing the meta i dont think ur capable of making rational decisions
I honestly don't know how those pastebins we're leaked as they were created unlisted and just made so everyone in the team could understand what was happening easily.
I don't know how you got them and honestly I don't care if you leak about roster changes but its really scummy to put out some of the personal things that we really ( or at least myself) didn't want getting out as they were no one else's business but our's.
This is a shitty situation and stuff like that shouldn't be let out in the public. I don't know if you're just a pastebin god John or if someone from our team leaked but either way you should honestly feel really bad for not taking two seconds to redact some of the personal stuff.
We are looking into finishing the season as all of us want to play.
Good news guys. I'm unbanned.
On related yet unrelated note, how do CS:GO teams typically find scrims???
Do they use IRC or do they add team leaders?
If we add wall banging lets add ults too so I can at least know we finished the job at killing a true class based shooter.
GG to TSU
Xalox and Cyzer had a great game
default is the only hitsound i can hear
Becasue we ALL know MLX isn't getting bodied
SetsulUhm, we have plenty of water here.
Let's get back to the moon first. Fusion reactors would be very helpful for that, not to help us get there, but to make us get there. Helium-3 would be a good incentive.
It's also way easier to get to Mars from the Moon. Thanks to earths escape velocity you need about 12 times a vehicle's weight in rocket propellant to get away. On the Moon 2 times is plenty. You still need to get to Mars which is about the same effort as starting from Earth. Also assembling a spacecraft on the moon might be easier than doing it in orbit. A base on Moon would mean that either in orbit or on the Moon we'd have the facilities to assemble it which is basically mandatory. Going directly from Earth to Mars would mean ~250:1 fuel ratio.
EDIT: #43/44
Yes, the Fermi Paradox is the question why we haven't seen it even though we should've. It not existing is only one of the possible answers. Keep in mind that while we are listening (SETI) we are not broadcasting. You'd need way too much energy for that, we can only do focused transmission and some argue (you can look it up if you want to get deeper into the Fermi Paradox) that we shouldn't even do that. So life existing but choosing not to communicate is a possibility.
About solar panel maintenance: It's quite the opposite. The rovers were only expected to operate 3 months before the accumulated dust would render them inoperable due to the solar panels power output being too low, but the wind kept cleaning the them. Also all the maintenance needed to solve that problem can be done with a broom.
I did not know about the wind cleaning effect that is pretty great.
I'm glad my hypothesis of Quert being a pedantic douche was verified. Thank you for the actual conversation Setsul.
orbitAvastI agree nuclear would be the best option too with what we currently have.
I just don't know how we would manage it without spending a lot more money then NASA possibly has right now.
Solar is the best option, for the early stages at the very least. It would take about twice the area to generate the same amount of energy here on earth, but even so it would be safer, more reliable, and I would guess cheaper than nuclear. The whole no atmosphere thing would also make it more consistent than here on earth.
But wouldn't solar's effectiveness be greatly reduced due to the amount of particulates at Mars like aforementioned dust storms which can render solar power generation almost nill? I don't deny short term it is the easiest but the amount of panels and the cost of such highly efficient panels/the need for maintenance greatly reduce their viability.
QuertSetsulFermi Paradox is just a discrepancy between the expected amount of life and the actual amount. According to what we know it should be far higher. Which means either the universe is a lot more dangerous than we thought it is or life and evolution aren't as easy as we think they are.
So mathematical probability isn't an argument you should be using to tell us there's no life out there.
Also going by mathematical probability Boltzmann brain wins by a very large margin.
actually my initial idea was the contrast the mathematical probability with the fermi paradox
now that i reread my comments, i seem to have worded it a bit wrong, my bad. you are correct about this.
So does that mean I am correct in my interpretation that the Fermi paradox does not rule out life existing in any way and is in fact just speculation as to why we haven't seen it yet.