GunbladeDave_is uplay still shitThe real question here is DRM in general still shit?
I think you'll find the answer.
idk man steam isn't that bad. I just heard people were complaining of uplay crashing all the time
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197998468071 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:38202343] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:19101171 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | August 20, 2012 |
Last Posted | September 9, 2018 at 8:29 PM |
Posts | 851 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 3.2 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
400 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
120Hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Zowie FK1 |
Keyboard | Ducky Zero Shine Zone MX Blue |
Mousepad | Razer Goliathus Control Alpha |
Headphones | Beyerdynamic DT880 250ohm + PS Sprout |
Monitor | BenQ XL2720T |
GunbladeDave_is uplay still shitThe real question here is DRM in general still shit?
I think you'll find the answer.
idk man steam isn't that bad. I just heard people were complaining of uplay crashing all the time
Do you mean gsync or lightboost? I thought this came out before gsync was announced...
Good monitor though, just beware of washed out colors (might need a calibration)
stardogebrazilian and portuguese are the same my friend and i swear in english
It's a joke; I had neighbors from Brazil. They were pretty chill. Go streaming m8
i put them on the center of my monitor
close to the crosshair
u know i dont wanna lose track of them
rite?
[*] Don't go with only a 600w PSU...you'll hate yourself for it in the long run; I've built multiple systems with the Corsair HX850w and haven't had a single issue. If you stay with the 600w, just beware, you'll need to upgrade soon
[*] I've got that monitor on another build at my house, good choice on it. No issues with it thus far
[*] Since you're going with a K series intel chip, I would suggest you get a better cooler (assuming you'd overclock, otherwise there's no point in getting a K chip) and some better thermal compound (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835209053 ; it costs 2x as much but you'll get better temps + heat dissipation)
[*] While I'm no expert on SSDs, I'm not 100% sure about the kingston ones, if you have any doubt: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147247 (used it on 3 systems, not a single flaw on any of them)
Aside from that, good build choices. I'd personally just go with the intel one because having 8 cores is kinda useless unless you do video encoding. Plus, seeing that you're going with a K series chip, I'd assume you'd want to overclock?
Biggest issue is see is your power supply; that's the last thing you'd want to cheap out on, because you're riding too close to the minimum psu requirement.
yo when will google start making 120hz monitors
obe_Dave_First of all, the $15 for "3 year insurance" was a waste for headphones that cheap (if it was for something like Stax SR-007/SR-009s, electrostats, or any other high end dynamic driver, that would make sense. But for k240s...no).
5 dollars a year for the comfort of knowing that I won't be out 100 bucks if something happens to my headphones is a waste of money? Alright. Guess I'm a terrible consumer.
Dave_I don't see why you would buy k240s without a decent dac/amp combo.
Except I did? I didn't initially because even though I saw people on headfi say that k240s are best listened to through amps, I don't generally listen to music with my volume set very high nor do I worry about messing with equalizers, so I wanted to give the k240s a test run without an amp and see what I thought. After a few hours I concluded that I needed an amp so I bought one.
Dave_The reason you spent "4x what the headset cost" is because you didn't do your research prior to buying your equipment. As a result, you spent way more money than you should've. If you want to keep it simple, go for something like the m30 ($40), m40 ($50), or m50 ($125). Either way you go, you get good sound quality and you don't have to bother with an amp. Then you can get a decent mic and you're still spending less money than what you spent for the headphones alone. But if you don't do your research, more likely than not, you'll end up wasting your money.
No the reason I spent 4x what the headset cost was because my headset was cheap and I wanted to grab a nice pair of headphones at a triple digit price. Any pair of 100+ dollar headphones would have been comparatively WAY more expensive than my headset because the thing was only 30 dollars, m50s included. That has nothing to do with me doing no research, I just wanted a really good pair of headphones.
Anyway, so "doing my research" just means that I should have bought an ath mx0 model? I knew about all of those options but I did a lot of reading about the k240s and people recommended them as being just as good as m50s, and the semi-open design appealed to me more than the m50's closed, isolated design. I also liked the detachable cable and the fact that the mk2s come with these insanely comfortable velvet pads. My brother has a pair of m30s and I tried them on for a few hours but the pads started to irritate my ears, and to my knowledge, all of the mx0s' pads are made of the same material.
I did my research man. I knew that I probably would have needed an amp, I knew that the m50 was an equally good choice in the 100+ dollar range, and I knew that I could have grabbed m30s or m40s at around the same price as my headset with a nicer sound quality without even breaking 50 bucks. But I landed on the k240s mk2 after spending an hour or two looking at other options, consulting headfi threads, and asking a few friends.
Also, m50s + mic would not be less than what I spent on the k240 mk2s alone (125 + 7 vs 105). In fact, if I got the mk1s (which are virtually identical to the mk2s, minus an extra coiled cable and an extra set of velvet pads) then the m50s + mic would have cost nearly 60 dollars more than the k240 mk1s (being about 73) before factoring in an amp price (and it's not like the amp is 100% required, I just chose to buy one). The k240s are just the cheaper pair of headphones.
Comfort and necessity are two completely different things. That warranty costed more than the mic.
And no, it doesn't mean buying an mx0 model. I just gave some names of some budget headphones that were moderately good that I have listened to. Nobody is going to sit here and rattle off a list of every good/moderately good headphone for you. Clearly, you're drawing straws here.
That's your fault for picking something that sounds worse and costs more and needs an amp.
Yes. I would figure that you would understand that the k240s were $100 (give or take a few dollars), and that excluding the m50s, it would be less money because 125+7 is indeed 132 (132>105). You're really drawing straws here.
To put it bluntly, you're arguing just for the sake of arguing. If you would like to disagree with me, just say so.
Setsul#15
Do not link that video ever again if you don't want to get stoned to death by angry audiophiles. Half of it is right, but the other half is bullshit.
It gets worse in the second video, a blind listening test mp3 vs flac, via youtube so both is encoded with aac anyway.
Of course; I'd never post something like this on Head-Fi, but this is teamfortress.tv. I can agree with you that it's not absolutely right; I found errors in it myself. Point is, the name of the video was, "Gaming Audio Myths: Avoid The BS & Save Your Audio Life". As the title implies, it's targeted towards gamers (most, not all of which do not have a very good understanding of audio) and is fairly easy to understand without much prior knowledge.
Also, no, they did not encode both the flac and the mp3 over with AAC. They played it through his headphones and then through video editing software, they just inserted the song they were playing as a track. By your logic, if I took my .aiff files and recorded a video of them and uploaded it to youtube, that would make all of my .aiff files on my hard drive aac files.
StimpackFerskin.
y u do dis
I feel like a dick for posting this but, there's always google's caching feature @ http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:OVvsKfPCVyYJ:teamfortress.tv/thread/17633/family-issues-when-playing+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
sidestepI'm using the Superlux HD681 with the Zalman clipmic. Paid like 40$ and got better quality than with my old Siberia V2 which cost twice as much.
I would also go for a Asus Xonar DG/DGX soundcard. It is definitely an upgrade over onboard sound and only costs 20-30$.
By all means, do NOT go for a soundcard; they're overpriced and their output impedance is too high and as a result you end up truncating the low and high end of your sound output moreso than if you just used onboard sound. Also, a computer tower is one of the worst places to do audio processing, as there is a tremendous amount of electromagnetic interference inside a computer case. This can cause distortion in your audio, with or without a sound card. Don't forget that most soundcard drivers are poorly written (read up on how often users have to modify creative soundcard drivers. However, the Xonar is a better soundcard).
Your best bet is to process audio outside of the computer case through a digital to analog converter (DAC). You'll also need an amp. From my experience, the best bang for the buck would be the Fiio e10 Olympus (don't get the old version; it has issues with 24-bit audio clipping). Also, all of the hardware functionality of a sound card is now done at a hardware level, meaning less delays, less resource usage, and less of a headache in the end.
Below is a video link with further information
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1rXcJuEsy0
obe_i've posted in these topics before having only owned headsets. i recently got a pair of akg k240 mk2s and, even though i'm now a fan of a nice pair of headphones with a separate mic, i still think that headsets have their place, and here's why:
some people either don't have music in good enough quality to warrant nice headphones, or they just don't care about hearing it in the clearest quality possible. and that's fine, whatever. you aren't going to ascend them to a higher level of listening by encouraging them to drop 3 digits on a really nice pair of headphones, so i never got why ppl in these threads think it's objectively better to rock headphones + a separate mic. a headset is cheaper (unless you're buying from razer or something) and more convenient than a 100+ dollar pair of headphones with a separate mic.
personally, i had a 30 dollar headset for a while and i used that universally. unfortunately it was started to get uncomfortable to wear since it was heavy and a little loose, so i got a pair of k240s and a zalman clipon mic (the 7 dollar one). 15 dollars for 3 year insurance aside, i still spend nearly 4x what the headset cost and the clipon mic's fidelity is a lot worse than my headset's. if i wanted a better mic then i would have had to spend even more.
so if somebody doesn't care about how their music sounds, and if they find their headset comfortable, then there's basically no reason to spend so much more money on headphones + a mic. my k240s are like wearing pillows and i've already worn them for 6+ hours in one sitting without even noticing they were there which was something i couldn't do with my headset, so it was worth it to me. but if somebody can do that with their headset and they think their music sounds good enough then a headset is acceptable.
e: oh and this was just in my case but i also needed to grab an amp for my k240s as well to get the most out of them so that was another 30 bucks, and that was the cheapest well-reviewed amp i could find. gaming headsets usually have an audio adjuster built in at least (usually on the cord), even if that doesn't work as well as an amp it comes with it and it's not an extra 30-70+ dollars.
First of all, the $15 for "3 year insurance" was a waste for headphones that cheap (if it was for something like Stax SR-007/SR-009s, electrostats, or any other high end dynamic driver, that would make sense. But for k240s...no). I don't see why you would buy k240s without a decent dac/amp combo.
The reason you spent "4x what the headset cost" is because you didn't do your research prior to buying your equipment. As a result, you spent way more money than you should've. If you want to keep it simple, go for something like the m30 ($40), m40 ($50), or m50 ($125). Either way you go, you get good sound quality and you don't have to bother with an amp. Then you can get a decent mic and you're still spending less money than what you spent for the headphones alone. But if you don't do your research, more likely than not, you'll end up wasting your money.
By all means, get a decent pair of headphones. In general, the build quality and audio quality sucks on "gaming" headsets. If you haven't heard anything better, then maybe a headset will sound fine or even good to you. But honestly, check out head-fi (forum with reviews), headphone.com (review and frequency response graphs), and goldenears (review frequency response graphs). If you want help deciding, feel free to contact me on steam and I will do my best to assist you.
Also the MMX300s are good. They are just the crappier version of the DT770s with a mic attached that costs more than twice the price of the regular DT770s.
But for the most part, be really careful where you find reviews; I saw that Asus's headphones were given a rather good review. The frequency response was awful:
http://img1.lesnumeriques.com/test/71/7193/vulcan_pro_frequency_response.jpg
*Ideally, you want something that is flat (linear response with a slope of 0)
Lulzyhigh of a Ping
do you live in zimbabwe or something