Borderlands and keep talking and no one explodes
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198033306404 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:73040676] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:36520338 |
Country | United Kingdom |
Signed Up | February 11, 2013 |
Last Posted | September 1, 2017 at 6:39 AM |
Posts | 1565 (0.4 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 1.25 |
Windows Sensitivity | Default |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
2000 |
Resolution |
2160p |
Refresh Rate |
60hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Ninox Aurora |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 Black (red switches) |
Mousepad | Razer Goliathus Alpha Speed (34x44cm) |
Headphones | AKG K712 Pro |
Monitor | Acer XB280HK |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B93k4uhpf7g
They actually had 40 horses charging at Kit Harington the absolute madmen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq3qdX2TGps
It's sad to see people here who've been so misled. They say they're tired of Tory austerity and think that if we stayed in the EU it would be the death of the NHS when that's literally the exact opposite of what leaving the EU will bring.
I don't get the thinly veiled anti-intellectualism. When 90% of everyone whose job it is to research this kind of thing politically and economically says its a bad idea and they do it anyway and say "the British public are tired of listening to experts" then frankly they are fucking stupid.
eeeTrue bummer, didn't the UKIP leader write a book about privatizing the NHS?
I guess the one benefit is that most people are supposedly happy with the NHS so anyone campaigning directly on breaking it up would have a hard fight to win.
Not quite, the current health secretary wrote the book about it. The man in charge of the NHS is the man who wrote the book on privatising it. I'm not joking.
The problem is no one will campaign directly on it. Once elected they are pretty much free to start carving it up which has been happening for the past 6 years since the start of the Conservative rule (ignoring the Lib Dems who didn't do much).
The fact is I don't see any way this isn't an objective disaster for the average working class citizen. We're about to hand the reins of the country over to the most fanatical neo-liberal party ever who already tried to privatise all education in the UK through trying to force them to become academies and would very much like to privatise the NHS. Cameron was bad enough but he's gone by October and Boris will likely be replacing him and that would be even worse because he's deceptively dangerous due to his carefully cultivated public image of being a buffoon. He's said that people would appreciate the NHS more if they had to pay for it (at point of use, not through taxes as it is currently). No one can say for certain but given the Conservative's track record we're up for more crushing austerity and more privatisation of education and health and other public services which is objectively bad for the working class. Not to mention the removal of EU funding of higher education means that either tuition fees will rise or the quality of education will decrease making it harder to leave the working class via higher education.
RussianGuyovichDavidTheWinhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAu8gbAttXE&feature=youtu.be&t=90
Yep, we're all like that. Thankfully our media doesn't have an agenda in their pick and mix editing.
I never generalised a group (though I'm arguably about to below), I just posted a section of video I found interesting.
EmilioEstevezeeeNot everyone has an opinion that's worth listening to.
Finally somebody comes out and says what they think. The remain camp were exactly what they were portrayed to be, elitist snobs sneering at the working class and acting like the votes and opinions of those less educated or less wealthy than themselves are somehow worth less.
I come from a solidly working class background and (while there are exceptions) on the whole their opinion on something like the EU referendum and politics in general does carry less weight because they are generally less informed. I'm not saying the polisci graduate's vote should count for more but if you're looking at who's opinion carries more weight I'd definitely pay more attention to them than a random person from the working class.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClsjsWVUsAA00u_.jpg
This is the kind of data eee is referring to
RussianGuyovichhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAu8gbAttXE&feature=youtu.be&t=1994
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAu8gbAttXE&feature=youtu.be&t=90
EmilioEstevezFood prices are expected to drop for example as we can buy from NZ/AU now
Sure lets import all our food from 11,000 miles away (as the crow flies, further because ships can't travel over land).
MelonTFFalcon0408MelonTFtrashI'm just going to assume you haven't actually clicked any link I've posted so far and end it at that
that doesnt even tell us how many people were searching for it before and after, worthless info
do you know what "spike in the last hour" means
do you understand that a 250% increase in an unspecified number of people is likely nowhere near a majority of a voting population
How about this one? https://twitter.com/GoogleTrends/status/746303118820937728
EmilioEstevezHow will it not cost their industries.
https://next.ft.com/content/f6cda050-20bb-11e5-aa5a-398b2169cf79
"About a fifth of all cars produced in Germany last year, or around 820,000 vehicles, were exported to the UK, making it the single biggest destination by volume."
If you start getting into a trade war and imposing tariffs, how will that not affect sales of European products in the UK.
I think they'd take the smaller financial hit of worse trade with the UK than the disaster that the EU disbanding would be.
The Leave campaign told us all the time about the £350m a week we would save by not paying the EU membership fee. In the first two hours after the announcement the economy lost £350b.
Edit: And now Farage denies he ever said they would spend that £350m on the NHS and says it was a mistake for them to say that
EnterimVegan_Meatwhy don't you stop playing copyrighted muzak?
I think tftv has a deal worked out with a production music library iirc, but ContentID is pretty overzealous and mutes stuff that is licensed sometimes.
If I'm wrong and it's always just copyrighted music anyway, perhaps it's worth considering switching to sources of Creative Commons or otherwise permissibly licensed music for videos that will be archived? There's a podcast dedicated to finding good CC-licensed music too if that helps, they always link their sources: http://www.amateurzen.us/
We have a deal with monstercat but we generally just use any music. There's no point in us switching to using specific libraries of "allowed" music when we have the raw OBS VOD to deal with. The only thing that would make us stop using any music is if twitch implemented muting live streams that were playing copyrighted music which isn't happening any time soon.
hookyDavidTheWinWould it be practical to have maybe a once-a-week replay of an old match? What about replays of old finals/LANs for hype (such as replaying matches from an old ESEA Final to hype an upcoming ESEA Final, or replaying i55 to hype up i58)?-leeDavid, my dude its just an idea no one HAS to do it but if anyone is interested maybe they could get in touch with TF.TV to try to make it happen...
And I'm explaining why it isn't practical at the moment.
Would it be possible to edit out pauses and delays, or would it still take a while even for a more limited selection of VODs? In my mind I'm envisioning just cutting off the sections that aren't needed, but it's probably much more complex than that.
Specific usages like that are definitely possible but it means making one PC mostly unusable for the duration of the replay. What would be replayed is the same as what we upload to youtube which is the cast in its entirety excluding the start/end music but including the pre- and post-game analysis and analysis between maps. Editing the VODs any further than that isn't useful because there isn't a neat point at which to cut them and you lose a lot of context.