If you're going to use an analogy like that you should probably say something like ass play.

Can't forget about mine, lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwZFHMQpfRY

Huh!? You shouldn't post opinions that have no facts behind them.

Edit- Nevermind, going to ask off here first

Hopefully you posted this on the Euro site, it always seems like maybe 5-10% of Euro's check this site normally.

Agreed, one thing that really drove me nuts about BSG was sometimes space was silent, while other times they would decide that space now allows for sound travel.

Edit- I want everyone to understand that I am saying this as a person that can almost NEVER play in this, since I cannot play on Fridays, so I think I am an outside party looking in.

While you are true to an extent, I think you're missing a huge point. If one team keeps winning money every single week, it's likely that less and less people will play, especially if money starts getting involved. In no way am I saying that invite rosters, if they are winning often, shouldn't get the money I just have a little tweek in this case.

Let's be honest about what is happening with community sourced donations for LAN, there is ALWAYS, and likely, the chance of it drying up. Considering that could happen, what if those people saved that money in order to fund sending teams to LAN? Instead of always waiting until the last possible minute to get 4 teams to LAN, we could start now if an invite team won this. If there was a few dollar buy-in per player (like one or two) and it was helping LAN and think people would be more happy to do it. There would still be tons of things to discuss, but he is my thought in two seconds of thinking the payoff.

Something like, if an invite team won that week they could take, maybe 25%, for themselves and the rest would go to a LAN fund. If a non-invite team, or maybe even Main, something like 50/50 or even 75/25. Who knows, it's just a jumping off point.

Dude, who actually thinks Little Caesars is good pizza? There is no reason to buy that shit unless you cannot afford an extra 2-3 bucks for something that is actually good

Thanks Tragic for the servers, even if your own team doesn't have one yet :P

It was the movie "this is the end" but

Sure, and you're quick Browny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKXmtHSzeXc

I had no choice to do this but I am forced, so I am sorry. My wife's G/f worked on the project, so I am only trying to help. It's a pretty funny movie, not great, but OK. You still get to listen to Backstreet at the end :P

You beat me to the punch there. It's hard to even understand if your uncle is that close to the margins why he would even have that many employees, and moreover, someone that has that many employees should've had some type of insurance already. But as a general rule with the restaurant business, if people aren't coming in to eat, it's likely the food that you are serving or your prices. That business is still booming, a slow economy hasn't really touched people eating out.

Everyone says that seems to only watch FOX. In fact, most places would be exempt since they don't have enough employees.

If you think indoor volleyball is slower than beach, you have never played or watched it at college or above level. Beach volleyball is a lot slower, not only because you can't jump off sand as high and with less force, but also because it's only played with two people per team. You end up passing high since you need to setup for the next hit yourself. While indoor, you have 3 front line attackers and two back attackers that are ready to pass to and smash (sometimes two setters). Not to mention that the balls are different and you can hit indoor balls ALOT harder. There is many times off a smash where you can't even react.

TLDR- Indoor is faster than beach, switch your analogy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl7230zSzUY