Cerduri think the obvious solution here would be to time items instead of banning them
What do you mean by that? restrict the amount of time somebody is allowed to use an unlock?
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198093829623 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:133563895] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:66781947 |
Country | Canada |
Signed Up | May 17, 2015 |
Last Posted | October 15, 2024 at 1:00 AM |
Posts | 2585 (0.8 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 3.25 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
800, 6.3 inches/360 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
240Hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Glorious Model D |
Keyboard | Durgod Taurus K320, silent reds |
Mousepad | Vaxee PA Black |
Headphones | Audio-technica ATH-AD500X |
Monitor | Dell Alienware 25 Gaming Monitor-AW2518H |
Cerduri think the obvious solution here would be to time items instead of banning them
What do you mean by that? restrict the amount of time somebody is allowed to use an unlock?
pyxelizewe already do not have enough teams in esea
tyvm banny and misterslin
In Season 23 there were 66 teams in O, 25 in IM, and 8 in I
In Season 20 there were 67/25/8
In Season 17 there were 54/26/9
In Season 14 there were 85/33/10
You're right and wrong about that. ESEA has been pretty consistent for the past 6 Seasons... But on the flip side, i definitely agree there should be more teams, especially compared to S14.
I think the Quick-Fix is on the fence. The Soda Popper and Pomson need to gtfo