a) Absolutely, and I think it's something every team should do

b) Yes

c) If we feel like something is consistently going wrong we will go over an stv of our team or a player pov depending on who wants to. I don't think we've ever gotten together and looked at other team's demos, I know individually some of us have, but never as a group.

We often talk about what we could have done better or what went wrong mid-scrim, and it's probably the biggest issue we have as a team, because as we're talking about it there are things we need to be focusing on/planning for and we just don't because people are talking. It's an important note for our team that a majority of talking about things that already happened be done after the scrim.

That being said, if somebody knows what's going wrong or has a better perspective on things and/or they know how to fix it, it's okay for them to speak up and make a proper call. It's also important for our teammates to have faith in that call and follow through

While I agree with this I think it's important to keep playing with the people you enjoy playing with rather than cut somebody on your team or leaving it because you thought they "just weren't good enough."
Make sure your goals are the same at the beginning of the season, if they aren't, then you shouldn't be playing together.

disgusting

now let me see your loadout so i can really judge you

will talk with my team once everyone is actually together

I've got nothing bad to say about this guy, would be a worthwhile pick up for any team. Has always been a reliable friend to me.

and if you treat him poorly, i'm going to get my goons and slam you

ctrl+f'd "forward" and didn't see anything useful. the 'counter' your looking for is to hold forward. since no team is going to 4-man sack on advantage and you should be pushing out when you have one.
the sack is designed to make it hard for you to push out provided the people who aren't sacking play it properly.
if you hold forward properly they'll be unable to do that shit, albeit forward holds usually have ways to break them. but they should have to lose numbers, health, and/or time in order to break it, in which case it's unlikely 4 players are going to be coming your way

all you nerds are talking about pushing out after you've let them sack, basically just giving them control over the tempo

[insert bad one liner here]

" those who oppose the MUD will be broken.
The MUD will thunder from the heavens;
the MUD will judge the ends of the earth."

also, I'm in favor of block's team

broking is dkennd

you're in the clear

this is what happens when your demo gets krits and the enemy team tanks the heavy on viaduct in a 12 minute 2 round game

good demo map

no

Don't know much about him in the DM department, but he seems to be like a fun and entertaining person to have around

If you treat dflame like a shitlord, he will be a shitlord. If you repsect him as a person and a player, he will respect you as such. That being said he has potential to be a great player and a great teammate with the right environment, and I imagine I would certainty enjoy playing with him. Unfortunately I don't have that opportunity and would absolutely recommend him to other teams.