squishbump again, team actually died lul
it died because you left
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198089492130 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:129226402] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:64613201 |
Country | Russian Federation |
Signed Up | February 8, 2014 |
Last Posted | February 21, 2022 at 8:05 PM |
Posts | 339 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 2.3 |
Windows Sensitivity | 10 |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
1400 |
Resolution |
16:9 |
Refresh Rate |
144hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
squishbump again, team actually died lul
it died because you left
take out any custom files and run the game completely stock
Is there a team bad enough to lose to a CS meme team?
Cerduradd me on steam to keep me updated on your studies http://steamcommunity.com/id/showstopperk1ng
Nice meme bud, you tried, but ultimately there are still 2 genders.
paiCMakyStalin killed close to 60 million people. Why would he be considered the greatest Russian leader of all time? You could argue that the man led the Soviet Union through WWII but that is not the sign of a great leader, but his military cabinet.You are missing the whole point. Its not him personally saying that Stalin is the greatest Russian leader of all time. Its a thing for school. He just needs to come up with points that can be argued for his favor in these kind of situations. It's called "a debate".
As an input, maybe talk about Stalin making women's life a little bit better? In theory in Stalin's time women could apply for the same jobs as men (in theory). And although me made divorcing harder, but paid some money to families who had children.
Thanks for the clarification? Still a stupid topic, there are plenty of better Russian Leaders. Like Sviatopolk the Accursed, he brought Eastern Orthodoxy to Russia and bought the peoples love and affection with packages of money. And, you know, didn't kill 60 million people......
Stalin killed close to 60 million people. Why would he be considered the greatest Russian leader of all time? You could argue that the man led the Soviet Union through WWII but that is not the sign of a great leader, but his military cabinet.
Cerduri wasn't really planning to do research for you, you seem interested in the subject though, see if you can use your google skills to find something other than a definition
https://www.genderspectrum.org/quick-links/understanding-gender/
This is a blog with no hard facts, everything from this website has no hardcore proof.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/
Nation Geographic talks about masculine girls and feminine boys in this article, but there is literally no evidence of gender being a spectrum. The article says " what we consider “male” and “female” don’t always line up neatly, with all the XXs—complete with ovaries, vagina, estrogen, female gender identity, and feminine behavior—on one side and all the XYs—testes, penis, testosterone, male gender identity, and masculine behavior—on the other. It’s possible to be XX and mostly male in terms of anatomy, physiology, and psychology, just as it’s possible to be XY and mostly female". The article then states that there is the SRY gene that sometimes isn't there, and this means that not enough testosterone was released to make proper testes in males. This could hypothetically explain why some men are more effeminate than others, but this proves nothing about there being more than two genders. Further in the article it talks about Polynesia's third gender, and yes, there have been third genders throughout history but this is only because of cultural norms.
https://gyazo.com/d25a3f772f329b460c36fbf75994f108 this is what google gave me, and only one of these articles was from a "respectable" source.
Lesbian_JakeMakystuff
All these dictionaries are simply a descriptive tool on how language is being used. They don't really hold any authority (apart from maybe a game of scrabble but that's literally just for spelling/what is and isn't a word) and they definitely don't attempt to. They just set out to give definitions of how people are using the words not to tell you how to use them.
Dictionaries are a lexical source of knowledge. They tell you about a word's meanings, pronunciations, etymologies, inflected forms, derived forms. I am well aware that a words meaning can change over time, but until that day you cannot sit there and tell me that it is not a credible source.
CerdurMakyIf they're not interested in picking a side then that means that there is no hardcore proof that there is more that two genders, does it not? I'm glad that research hasn't stopped just because of there being no evidence, I want the psychologists and gender scientists to finally crack the case.lacking consensus, and having debate, doesn't mean that there isn't evidence or credibility behind it, i'm sure plenty of people have arguments to make, i just don't think you've actually looked at any and thought a dictionary definition would be a solid argument
Its not just the dictionary definition, there is not a single piece of credible evidence that supports gender being a spectrum, if you find me an accepted thesis or paper published by a major publication then I will change my stance. Even then you cannot separate the established roles within society. If tomorrow scientists came out and said,"Yeah.... so gender is a spectrum, here is the proof" then I will concede my point and never touch the subject again. There is no fact as of now that there are more than two genders.
SentinelI don't get why we have to have a bloody label for everything just be yourself lmao. You can be a more effeminate guy or a more masculine girl, you don't need 200 bs terms to describe it
It honestly baffles me how much people care to present themselves as a bunch of adjectives about their race sexuality gender nationality interests or whatever the fuck else instead of presenting themselves as a human being that has more depth of character than a few epithets can convey
This is my view exactly. Why is it that people can't be happy being them? You have every right to be happy and I'm sure that if you want to identify as the opposite gender friends/teammates would be obliged to respect your wishes. There doesn't have to be millions upon millions of genders just to describe a single human, because at the end of the day, no matter black, brown, white, yellow, male, female, transgender, gender fluid, or any thing within the technicolor rainbow, we are all still human.
Cerduryes that's a fact, but the distinction is being made between gender and sex as biological and cultural/social differences, which is even included in your definitions
Yes, but culturally each of the sexes have different jobs within society, if we look at Middle-Eastern culture we see that women aren't on the same ground as men. Women are seen as property and are degraded just because of their sex. The only reason they are being discriminated against is because they are women and because on average women are biologically seen as the weaker sex.
Cerdurbecause they're interested in consensus and widely accepted use of the word, there's certainly debate around genderqueer stuff, so i don't know if they're interested in picking a side
it just isn't an argument, do you think psychologists looking into this would pick up a dictionary and go "ah well i guess we gotta stop doing research because this definition is limited"
If they're not interested in picking a side then that means that there is no hardcore proof that there is more that two genders, does it not? I'm glad that research hasn't stopped just because of there being no evidence, I want the psychologists and gender scientists to finally crack the case.
CerdurMakyit states that gender and sex are synonyms and can be used interchangeably. https://gyazo.com/4d3dd815a57067a266e2c041270038f5did you not understand the first part of that sentence? you can scroll down to feminism and genderqueer or look at the genderqueer wikipedia page, but you're right that wikipedia isn't really going to have the most useful information
MakyWords change definition yes, so then why haven't we changed these definitions?i don't know, the psychological community and the people who make dictionaries are different entities, if you wanted up to date information on psychology which one would you ask? the latter is more likely interested in consensus and acceptance rather than actually exploring and researching the subject
again i don't know much about it but you should probably have more of an argument than a definition
But the argument is the definition and the fact is there are two sub-categories of biological humans; Males and Females. If the psychological community and the people who make dictionaries are different factions (most of these companies are progressive and left leaning companies) then you'd think they'd atleast make the effort to change the definition. Then why is it that multiple dictionaries have almost identical definitions? You'd think that there'd be some respectable well-known dictionary that would get behind the notion that gender is a spectrum and sex is completely different from gender, right?
wtzviperman i love euro shitpostsRussians should be counted into a category of their own
Y'all are so savage to Russians, what did we ever do to you ;~;