from playtesting and theories, my think is that you don't get as much presence with the soda popper against stock scouts, and that can be abused during teamfights
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198055312047 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:95046319] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:47523159 |
Country | France |
Signed Up | November 5, 2014 |
Last Posted | July 11, 2023 at 7:31 AM |
Posts | 358 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 1.5 |
Windows Sensitivity | 1 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
1750 |
Resolution |
640x480 |
Refresh Rate |
240hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Steelseries Rival 100 |
Keyboard | Steeseries 6Gv2 |
Mousepad | Asus ROG GM50 |
Headphones | Headphone |
Monitor | Asus Strix XG258 |
i think i'm having the same, for the moment i just change res and then re-change and it works fine
need breton flag pls, there's a pirate flag come on
Triga- no handicap = if your reaction time is 300ms+ then it's unlikely you will become the best, good control of your hands and good enough eyesight? you cant also be mute or something. not too much to ask for tbh
I do get above 300ms many times, and my tension is low, still doesn't play that much skill-wise
@gemm it was meant like a joke, good job overall
i didn't like the production crashing during the grand finals, whoever could have been the producer
White cis scout males complaining about their scout's problem
are the rules about offclass still the same as before ?
oyeaI dont think players would learn gamesense faster if they constantly relied on somebody else thinking for them
they would neither learn better with a bad maincaller, and from my experience i've always learnt something from experienced maincallers, like mistakes i should never make, positions, game reading...
And just to make it clear, i'm not talking about a mandatory rule to have a 7th player, just giving the option to have one
@ballzy well, filling this role for certains teams would be very hard, but it would give the opportunity for teams that are really trying to get better at the gamee to improve really fast, that's what matters the most.
The idea behind it, is also that you can do the role unofficially at LAN, as Wiethoofd said, so seeing this implementation online, can be useful for a lot of teams, also because it's online where you're spending the most time of your practice.
@mecha as a coach you can't really call for your teammates because it's not freecam, it's about pov, so you get a general idea of what's happening,it's more about giving them ideas about how to act in a certain situation, what are the plays baiscally. and doing scrimms that way would make those "5 iq dm bots" think about what the coach tell them over and over to do, and then learn faster acquiring gamesense reflexes like "Counter-sac" "positions" "check offclass"...
hey there,
This thread is directed to tf2 leagues and its playerbase.
I think we all heard about this plugin, that kaidus used it with his team at LAN, but i can summarize it :
Basically, a guy who's not included in the roster, can call to his team stuffs to do through his players pov.
I'm asking if this sort of plugins could be used during officials matches.
It is, for me, a role i'd love to do, more than a standart player, and it would se healty for the game level itself, through creativity, focus, strategy...
free to discuss
i'd like to adress that Raf is a sponge tier aimer, you can take it into account
HildrethOlghacould it be possible to ban from competitions leaders that are unable to manage their team's season and drop ?
It's been already the 4th in div1/prem
I heard some bad ideas in my time and suggested a few myself but this is probably the worst I read.
Ban the portion of the player pool that is making and leading teams, yeah that is definitely going to make the league better. Great idea. Can't see any problems with it long term. Or make them pay to play, even better idea, they will definitely learn their lesson and not prioritize real life over TF2 again. Having led teams into ETF2L for over 20 seasons and only dropped once I can say it's absolutely mentally draining if you got a team thet doesnt work and are not fun to manage 5 to 8 players every day for every game and pcw and tactics session and then someone doesn't commit or has a sudden change in circumstance and you got to replace them quickly over and over again.
Its frustrating and as this isn't a professional league I don't see why the people who are the ones actively making teams and keeping the scene alive should be punished. They just won't want to come back, if I got banned the one season I dropped I probably never led a team again and it meant one less team, several players who maybe would not have played because of some rule.
I can't see how Connor should specifically be punished when it sounded like every pcw was a chore. Terrible idea.
You might have exagerated my words, i'm not talking about a 1 year ban here, but surely a season ban, how do you want to keep it with the long term if you have to roll the dice every season to get randoms teams because of people just being emo af. And it is also about respect, people in the same division commit time in their week to train maps strats and synergy. As a Leader, you should have responsabilities when you sign up, As ETF2L said with the degu and pred's thing, the leader is responsible of his team, maybe it would reduce the amount of leaders in the game, but it will surely make people being more serious about it.
could it be possible to ban from competitions leaders that are unable to manage their team's season and drop ?
It's been already the 4th in div1/prem
★★★½, mostly at i61. I hate playing with "Fanny Legacy" though