^
was good until 0:15. then it just took a wrong turn and got weird, i don't know why so many bands do that....

np. i recently found about them in june, and i've been in love ever since. just try listening to this album if you liked columbus. there's not a song there that doesn't make me feel good

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rowM5ZtQ3T4[/youtube]

you know what? that's gonna be my contribution. just listen to snowmine - dialects album

not sure what you're talking about?
snowmine - columbus hasn't been posted before. at least, not in this page
as for your post:

again, good instrumental, but the guy singing completely ruins the song for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl15PlIXHIk

The instrumental part is superb, i extremely enjoyed it. but i was not too fond of the guy singing. i don't think he fits with the song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvlw29Ad4RU

i would also be interested to know what kind of pc could get fps higher than 300, 400, 500, etc as well

you should really add a "pc spec" section in that survey near the end, so we can have an idea of the ideal cpu and gpu

same here as well.

apparently, people get -fragged when you criticize something

there are already several benchmarks showing little to no fps gain between rhapsody cfg and chris, the only fps difference that has been appearing is between -dx9 and -dx8, with the latter being better

so, how is that supposed to be superior? my intention is not to bash, but to understand what is the benefit people are going to receive using your cfg, instead of what they are already using? benchmarks don't lie

because so far, people are only using with the mindset that a new cfg that is not chris has appeared and it's going to get you way more fps highframes already does.

also, i'm having a hard time finding how your "cfg" is supposed to be useful? it basically combines cvars from chris highframes with some stuff that is not necessary and does not benefit you in terms of fps?
also, like someone said above, chris cfg is already pretty organized, there's nothing else that could be added to make it "more documented".

this is proved by the benchmarks already posted here by several users that shows no noticeable fps gain, yet you say, and i quote

doesn't look like it.

basically this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPvfxwce5_I&list=UUNc7UDUabbAB61d8MMPQO0w#t=100

gg kaidus.

http://i.imgur.com/ZdCQVJ8.png

Sooo .....should -dxlevel be removed from launch properties after first launch or not ?