lol those particles....seems a bit unnecessary. although it does make the game look good, it's most definitely gonna interfere in the gameplay.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198154627508 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:194361780] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:97180890 |
Country | Mongolia |
Signed Up | September 15, 2014 |
Last Posted | December 18, 2024 at 9:41 PM |
Posts | 315 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 2.5 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
1000 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
144hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | i'm |
Keyboard | surrounded |
Mousepad | by |
Headphones | idiots |
Monitor | *sigh* |
^
was good until 0:15. then it just took a wrong turn and got weird, i don't know why so many bands do that....
_obe
thanks for sharing snowmine though, really laid back indie rock, gonna look into them.
np. i recently found about them in june, and i've been in love ever since. just try listening to this album if you liked columbus. there's not a song there that doesn't make me feel good
- [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rowM5ZtQ3T4[/youtube]
you know what? that's gonna be my contribution. just listen to snowmine - dialects album
not sure what you're talking about?
snowmine - columbus hasn't been posted before. at least, not in this page
as for your post:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM99mTEHdZY
again, good instrumental, but the guy singing completely ruins the song for me.
CryptoRayinerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xrOgqKj1EENot really my usual jam, but I can see the appeal. The melodic stuff at the start is kind of interesting. I don't know how to critique this because I don't really listen to the genre.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKH18omeDt0
The instrumental part is superb, i extremely enjoyed it. but i was not too fond of the guy singing. i don't think he fits with the song
i would also be interested to know what kind of pc could get fps higher than 300, 400, 500, etc as well
you should really add a "pc spec" section in that survey near the end, so we can have an idea of the ideal cpu and gpu
apparently, people get -fragged when you criticize something
there are already several benchmarks showing little to no fps gain between rhapsody cfg and chris, the only fps difference that has been appearing is between -dx9 and -dx8, with the latter being better
so, how is that supposed to be superior? my intention is not to bash, but to understand what is the benefit people are going to receive using your cfg, instead of what they are already using? benchmarks don't lie
because so far, people are only using with the mindset that a new cfg that is not chris has appeared and it's going to get you way more fps highframes already does.
Ferskinif you do maxframes
i'll suck your dick
hooliliterally the only difference between highframes and maxframes are these cvars
mat_picmip 2
mat_specular 0
mat_trilinear 0
mp_decals 1
r_decals 1
also, i'm having a hard time finding how your "cfg" is supposed to be useful? it basically combines cvars from chris highframes with some stuff that is not necessary and does not benefit you in terms of fps?
also, like someone said above, chris cfg is already pretty organized, there's nothing else that could be added to make it "more documented".
this is proved by the benchmarks already posted here by several users that shows no noticeable fps gain, yet you say, and i quote
Rhapsodybe superior in every way
active and is updated with more convars that increase performance
documented much more thoroughly than Chris' was
completely re-organized in a neater fashion, and is much more user-friendy and intuitive.
doesn't look like it.
obe_WHAT IS THE POINT OF REMOVING THAT!?
basically this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPvfxwce5_I&list=UUNc7UDUabbAB61d8MMPQO0w#t=100
gg kaidus.
Sooo .....should -dxlevel be removed from launch properties after first launch or not ?