| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198071785065 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:111519337] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:55759668 |
| Country | Italy |
| Signed Up | November 15, 2015 |
| Last Posted | February 13, 2025 at 9:15 PM |
| Posts | 2113 (0.6 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | 6.91 |
| Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
400 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
240hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | Logitech G Pro |
| Keyboard | Logitech G Pro Keyboard |
| Mousepad | Steelseries QCK + |
| Headphones | Apple earbuds |
| Monitor | Alienware 240hz |
LaRarita7 : solo quiero llegar al otro puto lado >:v
translation thanks to smesi
5:17 PM - sad onion boy: i only want to get to the other fucking side >:v
*DEAD* Black n' White : daddy
Black n' White : shootme
Black n' White : in the ass
TOP SWORD : kinky
Mr. "Spooky Hat" Brawls : lewd
Black n' White : WEON
Insert Sal Here att: Gif Anchoa connected from an Unknown Country
Dr. Wolf connected from an Unknown Country
Black n' White : CUANTO POR TU SET DE ROBIN?
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qeaogxokufe4muv/AADyBR5WGFav72FJR5O9kE5Da?dl=0
hi im reero from usa and my team is kraken club
my alias is bengay in the process clip
people who join the tempus advanced server and complain that the jumpmap is too hard and rtv
https://i.gyazo.com/68387ef130a8244cb795153abf6d821f.png
we are approaching bingo soon
Why isn't my gif working
Downfrag me
GoaskAliceReeroPub"Man, if only those people in the crowd had guns on them, they could have shot up at the guy 32 floors above in the middle of the night and ended all of this."Unfortunately the venue for the concert had a no-firearm policy, so they couldn't use guns. (not that it would've helped). The guy went into the 32nd story of a hotel and essentially shot fish in a barrel because the hotel overlooking hundreds of people had no security.
Nah I'm not having that fuck people like you seriously fuck you times a million - unfortunately the state of America allows people to carry ridiculous weapons with some states having no limit on ammunition carried - as if his vantage point would have been undermined if someone in the crowd was permitted to carry fire arms is what you mean to say
Unfortunately the venue for the concert had a no-firearm policy, so they couldn't use guns. (not that it would've helped). The guy went into the 32nd story of a hotel and essentially shot fish in a barrel because the hotel overlooking hundreds of people had no security.
I was just responding to someone else's sarcasm with my own sarcasm
Pub"Man, if only those people in the crowd had guns on them, they could have shot up at the guy 32 floors above in the middle of the night and ended all of this."
Unfortunately the venue for the concert had a no-firearm policy, so they couldn't use guns. (not that it would've helped). The guy went into the 32nd story of a hotel and essentially shot fish in a barrel because the hotel overlooking hundreds of people had no security.
jozefReeroWhich is why we need to change. I'm not entirely sure why there's so much hate on gun control right now, as the problem seems to lie in the fact that mass murders are becoming the norm. Instead of stating the oh so common statement "you cant get rid of guns, it's not possible, engrained in culture" why not realize that middle ground is attainable? I dont think any rational human being in america thinks that banning guns, or even regulating them more would completely get rid of murders, but would stronger restrictions help? well we don't know cuz they dont exist. Maybe nothing would happen, or maybe fewer impulsive angry teenagers would go out to walmart and buy a gun off the shelf and kill 12 children the next day. We can't know, because people just assume its futility. I personally think it's not a complete solution that we talk about with gun control, but rather a way to cut down on the death. Analogy (albet one a little horrible to compare with human death): if you put winter tires on your car, you still could slip, yet less oftenTino_How is that a straw man? It is an actual argument that was touted all over the place not 15 years ago.All max said was that a straight ban of guns is impossible logistically, and any further restrictions on guns would be pretty useless as they have already proven futile or would also be logistical nightmares. Gun control is such a tricky issue in the U.S. Because this country's history, heritage,and political circumstances are so vastly different from any other Western nation.
The premise of the argument is literally the exact same. Much like global warming the issue is not black or white and there are many solutions that can be put forward. But the US just had a weapon fetish that it cant get over.
Looking at the history of guns, stronger restrictions have been placed on the purchase, modification, ammunition, and safety accessories (yes safety accessories) time and time again which only prove to be futile. If you really think that a teenager can waltz on into Walmart and buy a gun off the shelf and kill 12 children the next day you are very mistaken.
yewlThe part I don't understand is why do people whinge about the right to own semi-auto rifles? They aren't suited for hunting, and you don't need any more than a shotgun to defend your house if you're worried about that. Pretty sure the writers of the second amendment didn't envision the kind of weapons that Americans are allowed to own today.
dot_VulcanI don't think any good guy would need 50 gunsno civilian needs any type of rifle, period. my safety > your bitch ass hobby
??? Semi-automatic rifles are absolutely suited for hunting (semi-auto is not full-auto). Also, the framers of the Constitution didn't guarantee the right to bear arms for self-preservation only, they did it because their ability to contest the British military is what gained them their liberty in the first place, and should the U.S. ever become tyrannical, they want the ability to fight back. Also it is insulting to the framers to assume they didn't account for an advancing technology, in fact that's exactly what they did account for: they want the people to be able to topple a tyrannical government.
nitewhat is the logical conclusion of this argument? that no laws should exist because people will just break them anyway? common sense gun law works in nearly every other first world country in the world to reduce gun deaths and violent crime in general.
Once again, you have to consider the circumstances of arguing for gun laws in the United States. The United States is vastly different in culture than every other first world country, and there are also ~300 million guns floating around already, so regulating them significantly or removing them at all would prove a logistical impossibility, especially coupled with the fact that there are people who would rather die than give up their guns.
jetzzzzzppl are a lot less likely to kill each other if its harder to kill ppl. guns make it a lot easier to kill ppl. the results should be obvious. as far as regulating guns in a country that has 300+ million of them, thats gonna be rly hard.
SearchlightI may be talking out of my ass here, but isn't the dichotomy between 'good guys with guns' and 'bad guys with guns' at the heart of the American gun control debate a complete logical fallacy (not to mention an infantile way to talk about the issue)? Most US gun deaths are suicides, and a large number of those deaths wouldn't happen if these guys didn't have guns (see the ubiquitous anecdote about suicides in England after getting rid of coal gas). And take the person at the center of this mass shooting - until he did what he did, he wasn't a 'bad guy' by most standards, he became one when he killed dozens of people. We rightly regard physiognomy and dissection of criminals' brains as pseudoscience today, so if you can only tell who is a 'bad guy' after they've already shot somebody, how can you pretend to have any way of implementing a system that separates the wheat from the chaff consistently?
You raise a good point at the latter part of your post, but do keep in mind the countless times ccw has saved both lives and property. A better way to tackle suicide is not to tackle methods of suicide, but tackle mental health, and fix the many contributing factors to suicide(i.e, this is where your debates about healthcare, the economy, education will fall).
It's ridiculous how much of the board is filled already..
Tino_How is that a straw man? It is an actual argument that was touted all over the place not 15 years ago.
The premise of the argument is literally the exact same. Much like global warming the issue is not black or white and there are many solutions that can be put forward. But the US just had a weapon fetish that it cant get over.
All max said was that a straight ban of guns is impossible logistically, and any further restrictions on guns would be pretty useless as they have already proven futile or would also be logistical nightmares. Gun control is such a tricky issue in the U.S. Because this country's history, heritage,and political circumstances are so vastly different from any other Western nation.
MarxistI can concur it is fairly difficult to obtain an automatic weapon it's both extremely time consuming and very expensive. If one has the skills necessary to fabricate one illegally - the required equipment and skills aren't exactly cheap either, but they say the guy had recently won a lot of money gambling, so maybe that's part of it?
I still don't get why anybody would do such a thing though.
I've seen a lot being written about societal problems and mental healthcare inadequacies, but if anything - we have far better mental healthcare facilities than we did in say, the 20's when a huge portion of the male population had military training and plenty of reasons to be mentally unstable, not to mention non-existent mental healthcare. Why didn't it happen more then? For most of the 20th century there were handfuls of mass shootings (of the spree variety) every decade to be fair, but around ~1980 there was a sharp increase that has sustained itself throughout.
I think there are 2 big factors here: Media and large gatherings. The media constantly covers and glorifies these mass shootings to the point where it gives mentally unstable people reason and inspiration to choose large groups of people. It is also way easier to plan a mass murder given how today we have dense areas of people such as concerts, casinos, dance clubs, college campuses,etc. 80 years ago shooting people from 32 stories, walking into dark and loud dance clubs, and going to universities were not an option if one wished to kill people (universities were way less population dense in the 20s)
Tino_Max_There are so many guns in the US and the gun culture is so ingrained into the US it is pretty much literally impossible to take away guns. In 2009 there were about 310 million registered guns in the US. That was 8 years ago and doesn't include illegal guns. It doesn't matter if making guns illegal is the right thing to do it's feasibly not possible. Likewise with the US changing from imperial to metric, it's logistically impossible to do at this point
"Its literally impossible to reverse global warming at this point because it has already happened, so fuck laws that slow it down, fuck solar or nuclear power lets just go ahead and fuck the environment more with coal and gas."
???
Ill let you figure this one out.
https://betanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/straw_man.jpg