underwhelming size

i would like to see the image

why don't you go develop your reading comprehension and critical thought process

Are the only arguments you have "it's icky!! ickypoo!!! i do not like it!!!" and "ur old" lol

It literally could not be any more clear unless you can't fucking read, in which case I cannot help you! I said multiple times that I am not into it, and you can even easily verify that I do not draw it/barely even draw porn at all if you checked my Bluesky. Sorry you're too fucking stupid to employ object permanence or reading comprehension!

It is.

I'm 30. How old will you be by the time you grow a fucking spine and stop letting the thinly-veiled conservative politics of a 17-year-old game's fan forum dictate your opinions?

Where is the child porn? I deleted my Twitter accounts last year and I'm not making another one on the Nazi website to waste my time trying to find art that I don't even want to look at to verify what it is. I did not see any on Lilstarlite's Bluesky account.

But, also, there is a MASSIVE difference between cartoon illustrations that were not produced by abusing real children, and real child pornography that was produced by abusing real children (this is what I actually call CP, whereas I would call the other lolicon/shotacon more broadly). I will reiterate that I myself actively dislike loli/shotacon, I find it abhorrent; but I don't think victimless paraphilia deserves prosecution, particularly when it is not brought into the TF2 community and thus has no effect on the game or other players.

Either video games cause violence or they don't, and I think we decided the answer to this over a decade ago.

The OP is about furries and the kink artwork they make/consume, with a focus on the artist Lilstarlite. I'm saying no one should care about this because it has nothing to do with TF2 and, judging by the evidence presented, no one was hurt--and that the vitriol in this thread is coming across as internalized and externalized queerphobia and puritanical values.

Unless OP is burying the lede and their former teammates directly shared the artwork in question with unconsenting parties, such as OP themself, then it seems like OP sought out their teammates' personal social media pages and then rooted around for something to complain about. If it's on a personal account that no one is forcing you to look at, and it's labeled as adult, then who gives a fuck?

No one would be saying this if it was "socially acceptable" porn, I'd wager. This would not be news or a thread or anything but ribbing if the people in question were posting Honkai Star Rail boobs or whatever. I've certainly never seen a thread here about someone's xHamster addiction after someone went looking for their socials.

It's actually so fucking weird to care at all about sex you're not involved in lmao

What does this have to do with anything? I know it's not directed at me, because I properly label all of my adult art such that nobody should see it unless they opt into doing so with Bluesky's moderation tools. My catalog is also like 95% SFW, so what gooning lol. Is it gooning to at all be interested in sex? Are sex and masturbation gooning?

Oh yeah?

Man that's so weird, I wonder why you said gay furry sex instead of just furry sex, if queerness had nothing to do with your bias. A real thinker.

Are you in remedial English? Aiera said Jw good, but Aiera like and share neo-Nazi webcomic, so Aiera probably not have good opinion on other humans. Hope this helps; sorry it's longer than a Tiktok.

Being anti-furry is a conservative dog whistle. The furry community is overwhelmingly queer, and people go "ew, icky furry!!" when they actually want to say the other f word (faggot) instead. Sorry to inform you.

Kink is part of queer culture. If you give a fuck about what consenting adults are doing in the bedroom, you're not as liberal as you'd like to believe. Spending time and energy picking out and separating the virtuous and socially acceptable kinks from the gross bad ones is a fool's errand when conservatives exist who think being gay or trans is a kink. It's all of us or none of us.

I don't know anything about him. But your endorsement does not make him look good.

https://www.teamfortress.tv/post/1091462/palestinian-genocide

2 days lol

Sorry to tell you this, but we are just freaks and faggots to these people. The quest to sanitize ourselves enough for them is futile. The goalposts will always be moved. Case in point, this dude making it about me drawing furry porn at all as if that is some kind of reprehensible and disgusting activity I should feel ashamed for, even after I clarified that I am not even into the kind of art mentioned by OP, which is easily verifiable.

Enjoy your conservative circlejerk leftist LARP. I'm sure if we keep disavowing different groups of weirdos for being the wrong kinds of weird then they'll stop trying to take away trans rights and gay marriage!

Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

How old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about. You're mad about consenting adults having diaper kinks in the privacy of their own designated-adult spaces. I looked at the artist in question and saw zero sexual art of children, so why is this the hill you're choosing to die on? Try having a good, long think about why you find this stuff upsetting. Is it because you find it icky, or is it because there's actual harm being caused? If these adults were actively and purposefully sharing pornography with minors then that would be a real problem. Cartoons drawn by horny weirdos should be way down on your list of shit to worry about.

very nice dude and very good at the game. really enjoyed playing with him from a medic POV, great comms.

Really nice guy who puts in the work.