https://clips.twitch.tv/EnjoyableBadGiraffeSSSsss
https://clips.twitch.tv/CorrectPeacefulBobaKeyboardCat

As AC staff I'm not involved with the scheduling or the other League Admin related stuff, but I feel like this should be posted here as not everyone is on the ETF2L Discord and can see the responses in the feedback channel:

Just wanting to clear some things up as well:

I can assure you that we don't send out people who are not on AC staff (past member or not) with the intent to spread any (mis-)information. If people (smzi pls) make vague statements about future bans etc. they are very likely just memeing.

When a staff member is asked if someone is being investigated, the standard answer should always be something like "We do not give out information like that. Do you want to report that player?"
We don't tell the public who is being investigated, who is going to be banned etc. so that info should never get out, unless the reporter takes it upon themself to tell the world that they reported someone to ETF2L. Of course I don't know what happens in private conversations, and if someone on the ETF2L staff actually does weird shit like that, Aoshi and/or me would want to know about it so we can have a stern talking to / kick that person from the staff. :D

We also don't wait any specific amount of time to ban people, if the majority of the staff believes that they have conclusive evidence that a player is not legit, that person will be banned immediately after that conclusion is made so the cheater cannot play any further officials. Doing otherwise would be unfair to the team because their officials would get defaulted. I think the ban application policy was different in the past though when players only got banned whenever there was a ban post?
Sadly, some cases just take longer to make a decision on because of various reasons. But especially in scenarios like that we don't want any info to spread that an active player is being investigated, because if that player is really a cheater they might attempt to hide their cheats even more in case of future demo requests. Public witch-hunt threads aren't very helpful to us either.

tl;dr: There won't be a banpost on Friday, sorry.

I've been trying to download everything I can find that isn't easily accessible via Wayback Machine but that was cached by Google (fixtures, season tables, match pages, newspages). Sadly not everything is cached. If the last attempts to fix the volume should fail as well, we will ask for community help so we can try and hopefully restore the affected seasons and information on the site itself.

https://youtu.be/YO2T5ocnQcI

[10/25/2016 11:28:36 PM] Tyler McVicker: If you are a woman, hello!

Tapper impersonated Sonny Black and attempted to scam an unusual from an ETF2L sponsor to "add it to the prize pool" iirc. The ban reasons on ETF2L cut off when they're too long.

Wait how the fuck did you find the draft for our next ban post?

https://imgur.com/a/jXYNHDt
The map is leaking on both sides here, and if you step close to the window you can see mid.

Another thing is that while you switched the spawndoor models of all the forward spawns, you are still using the door with the two little "see-through" windows for last. That specific model can potentially be exploited by transparent viewmodel users (you can see through the entire door). I'd recommend just using the stock spawndoor model here as well to remove any possibility of exploits, though it's nothing really major.

Anyways, I love your map and I'm happy that ETF2L included it again for S35!

Hello.

-Germany
-majority of stream content will be TF2 related in some way, both casual/comp, maybe TF2 related art streams in the far future (SFM etc.)
-Mid 6v6, Div 1 Highlander experience (ETF2L)

Thanks!

Reckoner for comp, Cactus Canyon and Asteroid for casual. I "wasted" so much time on those maps in pubs, they were really fun imo.

He applied for AC staff and then he leaked confidential information to a currently banned cheater (Ry Ry), who also wrote one of the AC demo test reviews for froz to "help with his grammar", while froz passed it off as his own.
I wish I was joking.

These are great, thanks!

lmao

Just for the record, our Anti-Cheat team does not have a magical bot or algorithm that tells us if a player is cheating or not (that would be cool though, better VAC detection when Valve?). We look at each reported case individually, which of course means that we do analyse the provided demos and look at any other evidence that is relevant to the case. We don’t share any information about proper ban proceedings or specific case info with the public simply because we cannot alert suspects that they are under review or risk giving cheaters the chance to adapt to our methods. We don’t ban players “on a whim”. No case result is decided on by a single person, it is a collective task of ETF2L’s Anti-Cheat staff.

To Ry:
I don’t know why you are so fixated on what happened like nine years ago, admittedly I haven’t been on the staff for too long but I can still tell you that things have very much changed and improved over that time period. You can’t handpick two single incidents that old and apply them to the current day, especially when the staff-member composition has changed multiple times over the years.

Your point of “they didn’t properly watch the demos because the other team didn’t get a warning for having two Pyros on Gully last!”, well… frankly it’s not our task to provide warnings for that and afaik your team didn’t report the incident to ETF2L’s League Staff either. Your team still easily won that round and the two Pyros had no effect on the outcome of what was essentially a 7-minute Gullywash 5-0 roll, there is no reason to forward the incident to League Admins if your own team doesn't care enough to report it either.
I also don’t know why you go around spreading a rumour that the single reason you got banned was one clip. That is pretty hilarious to be honest. Don't think about saying you don't mean it like that either, we had people approach us asking if the reason for your ban was that single clip.

PS: Your argument of “proving everyone wrong at i65”; even if you do attend LAN and do well there, that does not automatically mean that you have never cheated in the past.