bonekill: muse
stab: muse
protect: squid
stop focusing my teammate
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197993619469 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:33353741] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:16676870 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | May 13, 2013 |
Last Posted | March 28, 2024 at 9:37 AM |
Posts | 2095 (0.5 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
bonekill: muse
stab: muse
protect: squid
stop focusing my teammate
Talking to girls in an attempt to get pussy has always been the same and it is not complicated. All you need to do is get a girl talking about literally ANYTHING and just keep asking questions about that subject. Continue to do this for each subject change that she makes. There you go, you now have what she feels is a meaningful conversation about something other than sex but in reality your strategy is about getting laid. Have fun young ones.
straight up listen to 80's pop songlists on Youtube when I MGE / DM / PUB
Very interesting song, not really my type of music in general but I enjoyed the melodies very much. Was a good listen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Dfo4zDduI
For me, nothing beats Metallica / Pantera what I am lifting.
ScrewballSpaceCadetIf you consider what the US has done to be "terrorism" then I guess some could agree with you. I am not among them."it's not terrorism when we do it" ~first world white people
Sad that you had to resort to this because someone disagrees with your opinion. Nothing you said was fact at all, simply opinion.
ScrewballSpaceCadetI don't think anyone is saying domestic terrorism is not a problem. Clearly it has been an issue and will continue to be an issue. Looking at the whole picture, fanatical Islam is a global issue and in my mind has much more far reaching and potentially harmful effects than single shootings here and there. The actual numbers of fanatical Islamic people incredibly outnumber the single lone gunmen sitting around America looking to stage a domestic attack. To open the front door to all these immigrants is a mistake.That has little to do with islam compared to christianity and ALOT to do with westerners thinking it is okay to kill a few million brown people and destabilize secular governments for their own interest. Even the 9-11 attacks where piss in the ocean compared to what the US has done. For some context refer to Osama bin Laden's (who by the way the US FUNDED at first) letter to America
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver
If you consider what the US has done to be "terrorism" then I guess some could agree with you. I am not among them.
AvastSpaceCadetTrump isn't the answer, he will likely not win in the end or even get the nomination from his party.
The only good thing about him is that he is talking about a subject career politicians view as "political suicide" and therefore avoid the subject all together. Banning Muslims is not the answer but talking about protecting our borders one way or another is the solution. He is giving that talk some attention and traction.
Wait you aren't arguing about banning Muslims just border regulation???
Space we're in compete agreement then you do realize right.
I don't agree with extremism in any form. There always has to be a middle ground where both sides give and take a little.
To just say to ban all Muslims is a ludicrous statement and anyone who takes that at face value is not seeing the meaning behind the statement. First off, he is playing to ppls fears for votes, something every presidential candidate has done since forever. Secondly, Trump has always been about securing our borders as a whole and not just the Mexican one. I fully support him for his stance on our borders and linked to that security is keeping out the biggest threat to our country. At this time, that threat happens to be Radicalized Muslims. Whatever he or any president can do to get that done, he/she has my support for that single issue.
Trump isn't the answer, he will likely not win in the end or even get the nomination from his party.
The only good thing about him is that he is talking about a subject career politicians view as "political suicide" and therefore avoid the subject all together. Banning Muslims is not the answer but talking about protecting our borders one way or another is the solution. He is giving that talk some attention and traction.
AvastWisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, Aug. 5, 2012 -- White Supremacist motivated - no mention of religion
Wade Michael Page specifically mentioned an impending "racial holy war" before the shootings and was associated with NAZI groups which are primarily made of extremist Christians.
The murder of Dr. George Tiller, May 31, 2009 -- Anti-abortion - no mention of religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_George_Tiller#Anti-abortion_militancy
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jan/28/scott-roeder-abortion-doctor-killer
You're out of your mind if you dont think this involves Christianity.
Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church shooting, July 27, 2008 -- Lone Shooter motivated by a lot of shit but no mention of religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knoxville_Unitarian_Universalist_church_shooting#The_perpetrator
He specifically states his hated of homosexuals was part of the reasoning behind it, I WONDER WHICH PARTICULAR GROUP DOESN'T LIKE HOMOS IN THE USA HMMM
The murder of Dr. John Britton, July 29, 1994 -- debatable it was even religion based, just Anti-Abortion. In either case, it is clearly just murder and not terrorism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Jennings_Hill#Motives_and_aftermath
He specifically stated he expected a "great reward in Heaven" no Christianity in here no sir
The Centennial Olympic Park bombing, July 27, 1996 -- no religious motive
the only reason the guy was caught was because he was linked to an earlier abortion clinic and lesbian bar attack, I WONDER ONCE AGAIN WHO DISLIKES THOSE GROUPS IN THE USA HMMM
The murder of Barnett Slepian byJames Charles Kopp, Oct. 23, 1998 -- another murder for abortion, no religion involved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Charles_Kopp
He was affiliated with the militant Roman Catholic anti-abortion group known as "The Lambs of Christ".
Planned Parenthood bombing, Brookline, Massachusetts, 1994 -- no religion involved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Salvi
He states he was "a thief on the cross with Jesus" hmmmmmmmm
Planned Parenthood Mass Shooting, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Nov 27, 2015 -- The guy mentions religion but at the heart of it is about abortion and not religion.
The fact you can even pretend that this event, an even abortion in american in general is not at all intertwined with christian extremism is frightening.
Wow Avast. There are MANY groups/religions that don't like abortion, you are putting labels on these people. In the cases you posed, there was NO MENTION of Christianity or VERY LITTLE at best for many of them. Just about every answer you just gave was your own label and opinion hence "I WONDER ONCE AGAIN WHO DISLIKES THOSE GROUPS IN THE USA HMMM"
You can't just say that because someone is "anti-abortion" they are one religion or another. Just for the sake of argument, lets say you are right and I am wrong. It still doesn't change that fact that the sheer number of radical islamic militants is exponentially higher than anything we may have going in the domestic US. That is why you need to take into account a threat factor when you talk about board terms like this. Radical Islam is WAY higher on the threat meter than any domestic terrorists we have right now. How can that even be debated?
Still gives me chills, my favorite childhood show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMcrep48Wz0
also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkQE5wuBFeY
Had to live through this show because of my sister and make it to GIJOE afterwards. I actually like the song :)
AvastWisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, Aug. 5, 2012 -- White Supremacist motivated - no mention of religion
The murder of Dr. George Tiller, May 31, 2009 -- Anti-abortion - no mention of religion
Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church shooting, July 27, 2008 -- Lone Shooter motivated by a lot of shit but no mention of religion
The murder of Dr. John Britton, July 29, 1994 -- debatable it was even religion based, just Anti-Abortion. In either case, it is clearly just murder and not terrorism.
The Centennial Olympic Park bombing, July 27, 1996 -- no religious motive
The murder of Barnett Slepian byJames Charles Kopp, Oct. 23, 1998 -- another murder for abortion, no religion involved
Planned Parenthood bombing, Brookline, Massachusetts, 1994 -- no religion involved
Planned Parenthood Mass Shooting, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Nov 27, 2015 -- The guy mentions religion but at the heart of it is about abortion and not religion.
I don't think anyone is saying domestic terrorism is not a problem. Clearly it has been an issue and will continue to be an issue. Looking at the whole picture, fanatical Islam is a global issue and in my mind has much more far reaching and potentially harmful effects than single shootings here and there. The actual numbers of fanatical Islamic people incredibly outnumber the single lone gunmen sitting around America looking to stage a domestic attack. To open the front door to all these immigrants is a mistake.
AvastI mean, while I would love for no religions to exist where we live Space. We can't really send all the Christian or Jewish people back to the fertile crescent or deny Christian/Jewish people entry to the US based off their religion.
When Jews and Christians start to shoot up random public targets because their choice of religion "radicalized" them, then we can entertain the though of sending them home as well.
AvastdollarlayerAvastIt depends, does use of Christianity to support enslavement and slaughter of Africans and Native Americans over about 500 years count as terrorism? Or does it only apply to proper civilized nations like us.
Does the Bible directly condone this type of activity in the same way the Quaran directly condones attacking non-believers. I don't think so.
Secondly, you are pulling up examples from hundreds of years ago. Do you have any modern 21st century equivalents from other religions that are so heavily involved in terrorism besides radical Islam?
Make ready to slaughter the infidel’s sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest they rise and possess the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants. (Isaiah 14:21)
Then I heard God say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.” (Ezekiel 9:5)
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. (Numbers 31:17-18)
If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with you. (Deuteronomy 13:7-12)
I too love me some violent similarities between all Abrahamic religions.
Can't those religions just stay in their respective part of the world?
Red_What's your point? The same rule still applies completely. Keep em out. Problems much easier to fix
agreeing with you, just throwing some math out there
Red_dollarlayerRed_Donald Trump may be a goofball. And saying that all muslims are bad isn't a good thing and is wrong. BUT sayingn no muslims in my country makes me feel much safer and it sure as hell gets rid of a lot of domestic terrorism problems for a while
http://qpolitical.com/someone-said-muslims-bad-woman-delivers-amazing-response/
Check out this video. Most Muslims are non-extremists, just like most Germans during WWII were not Nazi's and opposed the mass genocide of the Jews. The TLDW point of that video is that "The overwhelming majority is irrelevant" and that it is the extremists that are the ones we need to watch out for.
The biggest question is how do we distinguish the difference between a radical Muslim and a moderate? Do we wait until they commit a crime to determine their beliefs? Is there a way we can prevent terrorism while still allowing freedom of religion?
It doesn't matter if MOST aren't extremist which is true. What does matter is national security by letting muslims in even if only 1% of them come with malintent and this gets rid of that problem
1.6 Billion Muslims in the world
if 1% are extremists that = 16 Million ppl to track and keep out of our country. Essentially a staggering amount of people and only saying 1% are extremists is is low number by a lot of accounts.