fightgirls aren't a video game dude there aren't any cheat codes
Not true. Girls drunk or under the influence is hacking.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197993619469 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:33353741] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:16676870 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | May 13, 2013 |
Last Posted | March 28, 2024 at 9:37 AM |
Posts | 2095 (0.5 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
fightgirls aren't a video game dude there aren't any cheat codes
Not true. Girls drunk or under the influence is hacking.
How about we get some paid up teams first
I voted yes because power rankings are fun to read, especially at work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txLap_BCmGA
Ted for President
AloSecSpaceCadetAlosec tried to get a girl 2 seasons ago with HX but I spoke to her on the phone and ended that possibility. Might want to think about it nick/cloud.space you dickhead she was really nice!!!
6's before bitches
Alosec tried to get a girl 2 seasons ago with HX but I spoke to her on the phone and ended that possibility. Might want to think about it nick/cloud.
BucakeSpaceCadetSo because you cheated at a different game it makes everything ok? Sorry I don't buy that weak ass defense.
As I said in my post, you are the type of player who was 100% confirmed to have installed a cheat on your computer. It wasn't installed by accident or by an act of god. I don't know much about Baud's first ban for cheating but if it was 100% confirmed then I blame the admins for allowing him back into the league to possibly cheat again this time.
Once again, you can't blame the players for cheating because there will ALWAYS be individuals looking for an unfair edge. You have to blame the league admins for not issuing the proper punishment and set an example for future people intending to cheat in league play.
can't blame the player for cheating?
lol
cheating in games (especially at high level) is probably the worst thing.
so fuck cheaters. kick'em out, don't let them come back.
i agree with you when you say that admins should issue "proper punishment", but i think we should definitely blame players for cheating.
being a (AC) admin isn't the easiest of positions to be in and i am definitely less harsh when i judge admins, as opposed to judging cheaters.
don't get me wrong though, because i do realise that it's much up to AC staff to keep leagues clean and fun for (legit) players.. but fuck cheaters
Perhaps I worded that a little badly for my meaning if you missed it. What I was referring to was that "players" in general will always be the same and there will be cheaters among the player population. That is what I mean by not blaming players. Naturally, the actual cheaters are pieces of shit.
insomSpaceCadetOkay........but I cheated in an entirely different game and got VAC'd, also if he does as well on LAN without cheating, that's as good of an argument as it gets. Why shouldn't players get a second chance especially if these admins aren't even showing the evidence.insomyo how do you cheat on soldier
You should know insom, after all you cheated as well right?
Players are always going to try and cheat one way or another, it has been that way since internet gaming started. The only way to combat it is for league admins to deal with these people directly with no exceptions. (not talking about baud directly)
If you find a player who has intentionally installed a cheat on his computer and it is 100% confirmed then that player needs to be banned from ever playing again in a league setting. By allowing cheaters to continue playing with minor penalties, you encourage others to "try" and get away with cheating.
Way too many posts on this board have supported confirmed cheaters in the past and it makes me angry. In every thread someone says "well he never cheated on LAN". What a fucking stupid argument to defend a cheater.
So because you cheated at a different game it makes everything ok? Sorry I don't buy that weak ass defense.
As I said in my post, you are the type of player who was 100% confirmed to have installed a cheat on your computer. It wasn't installed by accident or by an act of god. I don't know much about Baud's first ban for cheating but if it was 100% confirmed then I blame the admins for allowing him back into the league to possibly cheat again this time.
Once again, you can't blame the players for cheating because there will ALWAYS be individuals looking for an unfair edge. You have to blame the league admins for not issuing the proper punishment and set an example for future people intending to cheat in league play.
insomyo how do you cheat on soldier
You should know insom, after all you cheated as well right?
Players are always going to try and cheat one way or another, it has been that way since internet gaming started. The only way to combat it is for league admins to deal with these people directly with no exceptions. (not talking about baud directly)
If you find a player who has intentionally installed a cheat on his computer and it is 100% confirmed then that player needs to be banned from ever playing again in a league setting. By allowing cheaters to continue playing with minor penalties, you encourage others to "try" and get away with cheating.
Way too many posts on this board have supported confirmed cheaters in the past and it makes me angry. In every thread someone says "well he never cheated on LAN". What a fucking stupid argument to defend a cheater.
For those looking for the brackets -- http://teamfortress.tv/thread/21166/real-ultiduo-tournament-2014
It really depends on what map is going to take it's place. What map or maps are being considered to replace a current map? For example, I would much rather play Granary than Logjam.
DrJeremySpaceCadetDrJeremySpaceCadetDrJeremyYou have to be kidding or really, really, really dumb
-He should have been indicted because he used an illegal technique of excessive, lethal force to kill an unarmed, non-threatening person - hands up, then on the ground, and yelling "I can't breathe"
-There are so many other things that could have been done - handcuffs, pepper spray, baton, taser, or actually talking it out and explaining what the fuck is going on or not being a pig tryin to meet the quota
-No one is saying he should or should not have resisted arrest, but that Eric Garner did not pose enough of a threat to warrant lethal force - especially at the stage where he clearly verbally communicated that he could not breathe
You have to be braindead to actually think lethal force is the only course of option that could have possibly been taken. Seriously.
You have to be braindead to think that what the police were doing was using lethal force. They were physically restraining a person resisting arrest.
I'm speechless.
Just because the guy died from being overweight and having asthma does not make what the police did "lethal force".
Would you say the same for someone getting tazered who had a bad heart?
Just because the guy died from being overweight and having asthma
Alright, stop trolling now.
I don't understand. Are the facts and the truth not fitting into your agenda? He was very overweight, he did have Asthma.
He was not put in a MMA style choke hold where the officer was choking him to deny him air. He was taken down by the neck which is the correct technique. There is a HUGE difference between those two things but they are both being folded into the word "choke".
DrJeremySpaceCadetDrJeremyYou have to be kidding or really, really, really dumb
-He should have been indicted because he used an illegal technique of excessive, lethal force to kill an unarmed, non-threatening person - hands up, then on the ground, and yelling "I can't breathe"
-There are so many other things that could have been done - handcuffs, pepper spray, baton, taser, or actually talking it out and explaining what the fuck is going on or not being a pig tryin to meet the quota
-No one is saying he should or should not have resisted arrest, but that Eric Garner did not pose enough of a threat to warrant lethal force - especially at the stage where he clearly verbally communicated that he could not breathe
You have to be braindead to actually think lethal force is the only course of option that could have possibly been taken. Seriously.
You have to be braindead to think that what the police were doing was using lethal force. They were physically restraining a person resisting arrest.
I'm speechless.
Just because the guy died from being overweight and having asthma does not make what the police did "lethal force".
Would you say the same for someone getting tazered who had a bad heart?
DrJeremyYou have to be kidding or really, really, really dumb
-He should have been indicted because he used an illegal technique of excessive, lethal force to kill an unarmed, non-threatening person - hands up, then on the ground, and yelling "I can't breathe"
-There are so many other things that could have been done - handcuffs, pepper spray, baton, taser, or actually talking it out and explaining what the fuck is going on or not being a pig tryin to meet the quota
-No one is saying he should or should not have resisted arrest, but that Eric Garner did not pose enough of a threat to warrant lethal force - especially at the stage where he clearly verbally communicated that he could not breathe
You have to be braindead to actually think lethal force is the only course of option that could have possibly been taken. Seriously.
You have to be braindead to think that what the police were doing was using lethal force. They were physically restraining a person resisting arrest.
boppetEric Garner NEVER attacked any of the officers and never showed a threat. He never touched any of the police officers. Even while Garner was being taken down, he still did NOT try to get away or attack any of the officers. He was never a threat was killed. The officer on the chokehold SHOULD HAVE in my opinion, pay for this. Even if he didn't mean to kill him, he made a wrong decision and there are consequences to that, such as manslaughter etc.
Also, do you know why people are so angry about these cases? It's because he wasn't even indicted. It's one thing to go to trial and be found not guilty. I'm sure people will be more open to that, (despite the anger it may still cause) But not being able to even ENTERTAIN THE IDEA that something wrong was done, they brush it off as a non-controversy.
News flash, you do not need to physically touch a police officer to resist arrest. The officers had probable cause to arrest/detain this guy and he refused to comply. That is textbook resisting arrest.
Why should he have been indicted? The guy resisted arrest. What other course of action did he leave the police? Please tell me what the next step was for the police?
I am still waiting patiently for any of you to explain how this guy was NOT resisting arrest. Stop trying to act as if this guy did nothing wrong during the confrontation.
SouthpawSpaceCadet
You also dodged my main point with that "asinine scenario" that could have easily been reality.
The fuck are you talking about, he was on the ground with 5+ cops on top of him and he was still being choked out. How was he still a threat at that point?
I doubt you read anything I posted if that is all you have to say. Like I said in my other posts which you did not read. Watch the ENTIRE video and not just the 7 seconds you saw on CNN.