Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197978342380 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:18076652] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:9038326 |
Country | Canada |
Signed Up | July 22, 2012 |
Last Posted | May 1, 2014 at 4:15 PM |
Posts | 401 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
damn now theres a link on my new tab page in chrome to natf2 what do i do with taht now
I run sign 24/7
fuck the haters
fuck tuition, Im just going to have to buy a ticket to dallas so i can meet s.
fosterplease tell me you and kevin are brothers
thats exactly what i said and i got no response
matterteaMcdonalds puts a chemical in their food that suppresses vomiting. If they didn't, your body would reject it.
oooh, a chemical...
that sounds ominous...
green default
I hate when stupid people misuse the word organic
potYou do know that every scoring play is reviewed by the people upstairs...It was simultaneous possession when Tate and Jennings first hit the ground, and simultaneous possession always favours the team on offense. There should have been an offensive pass interference call though, but penalties aren't reviewable.
The NFL rule book states that simultaneous possession only occurs when both players come into possession of the ball at the same instant. When one players gains control of the ball, and another player subsequently attempts to gain possesion, then there is no simultaneous possession.
Jennings caught that ball.
The call was upheld after review because the (incorrect) ruling on the field of simultaneous possession isnt reviewable for some reason.
Obviously the missed offensive PI call should havce ended the game as well.
What I dont understand is why the ref who (correctly) signalled for a interception-caused touchback, didnt stick to his guns and say it was not a touchdown.
My guess is that, since every scroing play is reviewed, one of the officials in the conference said to just call it a touchdown so they can review it. The probalem is that none of them knew that the simultaneous possession call isnt reviewable. But that might be giving the refs too much credit so who the fuck knows.