#3947 shit i didnt read straight your sentence about cyberpunk projected fps. my bad.

#3946 fair points that add up to a reasonable price, (more reasonable than spending 60 eur on a 3770k alone lol) thanks. Does ddr4 3200 matter compared to ddr4 2666?

#3944

The last time i checked overclocking I thought increased voltage reduced lifespan of the chip. Not sure how much I gain between stock voltage oc and vcore oc to figure out if it's worth it.

Sorry. I have these 2 https://store.steampowered.com/app/236870/HITMAN/ https://store.steampowered.com/app/863550/HITMAN_2/

ok. Is this game the most demanding of the last couple of years on the CPU? I could live without it if that's an outlier like supreme commander once was.

The way I read it (pls correct me):

• Cyberpunk seems to be one of the if not the hardest title on cpu at the moment
  
• i7 3770k is 20% slower than i3 9100 which would translate to ~40FPS in cyberpunk(?), not great but not unplayable either if that's only this game that demands this much.

Hi Setsul guys,

I have an i5 2500k (never overclocked) with 32gb (salvaged) ddr3 and a gtx 1060.
Besides TF2 I sometimes play more recent titles like hitman, dying light, or cyberpunk. I use 1080p.
I aim at 100fps in ..fps, and 60 for the rest.
Even TF2 is not always stable at 120+fps when the browser runs on the second screen.
I have no plans to bin the whole PC and I'm looking at upgrades to keep gaming on w10 for another 3-5 years.

The options I think I have:
- overclock without increasing voltage (i have a decent aircooler)
- upgrade to i7 3770k/2600k
- upgrade to i7 3770k/2600k then overclock those

I have a hard time finding recent reliable benchmarks of those CPUs especially in recent games that use more threads. I don't feel I can trust gpucheck/cpu monkey types of benchmarks and would be grateful to receive some advice.

Then depending on how that goes I may later on buy a more recent gpu like a 3060 or rx 7600, no real idea yet and open to advice.

cheers

ftfy

With sound, demo on process, I rollout sewers, trap the door, and kill the enemy roamer

in tf2: learning that it's okay to lose, casting on tftv, overcoming my mental block to do the process rollout and soon having my 4 tftv stars

outside of tf2: i'm still alive, in decent health and with a decent job I guess

what about the frenchies

my point was more like why would the devs make what enzo called a "fast paced shooter" and then include a dude who places automated stationary guns in it?

but anyway back to the topic:
in starcraft maps are often balanced by making some terrain unbuildable.
in TF2 the original intent seemed to be to force close quarters fighting.
But what if there was an other way using vscript SecondaryAttack() to make the sniper not able to scope ? or use BleedPlayer() in combination with whatever can replace a weapon (the cozy camper) ? Both these techniques could be used to arbitrarily remove sightlines and AFAIK would not require server plugins.

it's allowed in hl yet very rarely used though.

your argument could also apply to the engineer and with that logic you quickly remove more classes than just the sniper

Swoose - Hyphae https://youtu.be/nPJWHO6g1F8

I also approve Louis Cole very much

there are so many weapons revolving around countering stickies or projectiles but nothing to manipulate vision :/

for me the biggest impact removing the sniper could have would be the freedom given to map makers

looked to me like the feedback at the end pointed to players feeling freer too.

you're not wrong on the form but I found it a good opportunity to start a fun 'what if..' thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFXGwko225k

Now this is a topic I would very much like to see experimented in 6s and HL.

how useful are those against mosquitoes?

To answer the topic, I like to read, wrench on stuff/get new tools, and build/paint warhammer miniatures

that's a question worth surveying tbh. I feel like post coach kaidus, no delay streaming and tools like discord like Tob said much more people would find this fun