Dougsnip
There is bias in everything, even if you try to limit it there will still be bias. Trying to argue that the entire public, many of whom do not know or do not even know of the player, will be more biased than an AC team of a select few, many of which I would imagine have played against the player, is an uphill battle. I don't think that the public should decide whether or not a player is banned for cheating, because many people cannot tell if someone is cheating (see CSGO hacking witch hunt), I'm saying that they should release at least a summary of their proof so that the AC team can be called out if they're not doing their job correctly. As for your last point, I had already addressed it. The method for proving a player is cheating should be foolproof, not reliant on some secret method that requires the cheaters being unaware because there will be cheaters who are aware and then the method is useless anyway.
I want to remind everyone of powah who was banned falsely, proceeded to play in NA and then return to Brazil and melt peoples faces off. I want to also remind people of quad who was falsely banned and although it wasn't by an AC team, it was by people in a similar position with similar resources. Finally, I want to remind everyone that before b4nny attended ESEA LAN for the first time, there was a decent population of people who thought he used wall hacks and he obviously doesn't.
I'd like to repeat something I said in my first post again, it is better to have a non-blatant hacker player, than to have an innocent player be banned from the only league they could play.
If someone has something to say to what I've said or stronger proof in the other direction, I would love to hear your reasoning.