If this has been ranted about before, apologies.
Earlier today my team and I found that one of our scout players was banned from participating in any match for a week for guilt by association. The reason for this is because he put together a pug scrim that unbeknownst to him contained a player that was suspended by RGL for racism, who then went on to say another racist term in the pug scrim. Now my team is being indirectly punished for RGL's overreaching policies, forcing us to play with a sub going into the final week when we're on the playoffs bubble.
The fact that he got suspended for someone else's action when all he did was get a group of players together to play a pug is stupid on its own (he is supposedly responsible for someone else saying something according to staff), but the idea that you are then restricted from playing in RGL when it all occurred outside of any kind of affiliation with them is insane.
Rule in question:
[1002.4.1] - Using a banned player in a scrimmage
Banned players can play in RGL scrimmages. In the event that a banned player is playing in an RGL scrim or pickup game scrim of RGL players, and said player commits an act that would result in further bans, then the leader(s), active RGL player(s), and/or scrim organizer(s) responsible for that player's participation are subject to a possible league ban, in addition to a minor team penalty.
Where is the limit? What if you don't know the player that gets you banned? What if someone else you invited invites that person? Does every single pug service have to keep a running list of who is banned? RGL rules and enforcement of them continue to confuse.