phAZEpara 1
kobe was not 50%, he was the skilled shooter they needed to punish teams for tripling shaq
they rewrote the rules on zone defense because shaq was unstoppable
he was a monster, if youre going to act like a kobe bryant was 50% of that duo then i have hundreds of hours of games that prove you flat out wrong. phil jackson unabashedly admitted repeatedly that their strategy was to ride shaq because he pretty much couldn't be defended. The three championships the lakers won UNDOUBTEDLY were on shaqs back who had MONSTROUS performances in every series.
in 2004, the year they lost to the pistons in the finals, shaq was 32 years old and kobe was 26. kobe at this point had already insulted shaq and called him old, slow and fat (great teammate). the pistons had an elite defensive center in ben wallace. and best of all, the pistons were going to play kobe and shaq 1 on 1 and force them to carry their team, not rotating help as often as other teams would. by all accounts kobe should have been a monster in the series.
the result? shaq played a good series, he had a couple of monster games, and one or two duds. kobe was atrocious, one of the worst playoff series for him ever, and the most telling of all is that in the game where detroit was able to keep shaq off the court because of foul trouble kobe couldnt create ANYTHING. total dud and disappeared when his team needed him the most, he needed shaq to draw defenses to play the way he wanted. THIS IS KOBES PRIME AND WHEN SHAQ IS 32
phAZEpara 2
lets list better players: wilt chamberlain, bill russell, kareem abdul jabbar, magic johnson, larry bird, hakeem olajuwon, karl malone, tim duncan, shaq, michael jordan, isiah thomas (and tbh id throw more in there like dr j, moses malone, charles barkley, clyde drexler if we're including personality)
i can also list the shooting guards who would have won 3 (or more) championships with shaq if they had him in 98-04: wade, jordan, drexler, penny if he didnt get injured, mcgrady same deal, reggie, gervin and probably curry, harden, and AI. Again, shaq was a monster and by 98 he was smarter about using his unreal ability. in 95 shaq outplayed hakeem olajuwon in the finals, again: shaq outplayed hakeem olajuwon in the finals. when he was 23. hakeem. in the finals.
and do i think michael would have put up with dwight? no, but he would have handled it VERY differently. michael would have pushed him hard as fck in practice, he wouldve challenged him to play harder and practice more, he wouldve held him accountable for his shortcomings all that jazz. but that isnt toxic, thats motivated, thats competitive. kobe doesnt do that. kobe isnt going to push you to practice harder, hes just going to snipe at you to the press afterwards. kobe isnt going to come up to you face to face and tell you to shape up, hes going to call you soft to the press. kobe isnt going to spend hours practicing with you everyday so when its the last possession he trusts you wont fuck it up. kobe has always been the guy to say "hey im doing my part, im not the weak link here" without having that star like ability to make other guys seem extraordinary. michael elevates his teammates, kobe denigrates them.
phAZEpara 3
shaq for a brief time? rofl
kobe from his rookie year until he left was at odds with shaq, with brief periods of respite. and if you ask phil jackson (the one man who was able to make them bear each other if only for a brief period) its because kobe was always the outsider. phil writes about how when he took over when the team reviewed film there would be the team (with shaq) sitting there and then in the back would be kobe with his hoodie up not speaking a word. kobe just doesnt communicate with his team well on or off the court, this isnt a mystery or an opinion, kobe is one of the few star nba players who is a true introvert.
and you ask why i consider kobe an overconfident idiot in games? well maybe its the fact that hes awful in the clutch and cant play in actual offensive schemes, but i think more telling is the article you yourself linked. kobe talks about how when he plays he only sees the hoop, and he needs to be yelled at to notice anything else, what is that if not really really shitty game sense? and kobe does work harder than michael, i will never debate that, but i would argue that work is less fruitful. michael used to play 1v1 with scottie after practice for hours, it benefited both and built a connection that blossomed on the basketball court. kobes never had a scottie. i didnt say kobe didnt work as hard or had worse mechanics, i said that kobe didnt have michaels physical gifts (which he clearly doesnt), michael was an athletic freak on par (almost) with lebron and he had freakishly large hands, kobe doesnt have the physical gifts michael did.
phAZEpara 4
kobe is a great defender. 1 on 1. the issue is that in the nba theres so much more than just making sure your guy doesnt score, and just as kobe talked about how he only sees the hoop and literally needs to be yelled at to see anything else, when kobes defending he only sees his man. its not his fault if someone else gets beat after all. kobes help defense has always sucked, and hes been a perennial defensive allstar because its a popularity contest.
phAZEpara 5
kobe is the most overrated athlete of all time. i wish, i really do, that i could provide a comparison of him to another overrated player like pele or terry bradshaw, but kobe is literally on another level. he doesnt have fans, he has a cult, and that cult (much like kobe himself) suffers from serious tunnel vision where they continually say "oh kobe never gets beat for the score, hes so good on D" or "sure he didnt make it, but kobes the only player in the league that can even attempt shots like that" and its like GOD DAMN DON'T YOU SEE? the best player isnt the most skilled, its the one who gives his team the best chance to win and kobe didnt do that