Vecchttp://steamcommunity.com/id/HungTrap
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198045838834 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:85573106] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:42786553 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | August 19, 2017 |
Last Posted | March 3, 2025 at 11:08 PM |
Posts | 320 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 3 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
500 |
Resolution |
1080p |
Refresh Rate |
270 |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | O- |
Keyboard | CREAMS |
Mousepad | big ass one from novelkeys |
Headphones | sen hd599s |
Monitor | Acer XF240H |
all the fuckin commiescommunism > capitalism
I'm not some political nerd like you gamers, but the way I see it the production isn't socialized because the products aren't socialized. They're sold individually to individuals, not socially to societies. If production were socialized, that would necessitate that the needs and wants of the people would be social rather than individual. And ultimately, the individual should be who these systems work to benefit, not the society, because the one thing that can't be socialized is happiness. Which is the one thing communism, at least as I understand, and how I've seen it argued for again and again just ignores: a person's wants.
And so the question I would pose to you is: How does communism do a better job at meeting the individual's wants than capitalism? What is the mechanism by which communism is better at this than capitalism, and moreover, how would it be implemented?
Do you just give everyone whatever they want? Or do they have to participate in production to earn it? And if the latter is the case, how is this functionally any different to capitalism as implemented in a state with some or all socialized basic necessities, like, say, the modern developed world? Or are wants something that will simply stop mattering when we seize the means of production?
viperit's a black rifle with a pistol grip, therefore it is more dangerous than a wood-furnished rifle without one.
DarkNecrid"Another vote is held on a measure to prevent terrorism suspects from buying firearms, but it does not pass"
I would ask two questions about that:
1.) what is a terrorism suspect
anyone who says they're gonna bomb their school in WoW chat? muslims? brown people? immigrants? people who use encrypted IM services? people who google 'how to make a bomb'? people who own bitcoins? all of these people have been made into terrorist suspects at one time or another
the term terrorism suspect is so broad and nebulous as to be essentially meaningless. And i understand that a part of any bill of that type would likely lay out a definition and so on and so forth, but that's just my point: you're letting one of the most simultaneously corrupt and incompetent governments in the developed world decide on a case-by-case basis whether a person should be allowed to own a gun, when I wouldn't trust them to decide on a case-by-case basis what necktie to wear.
2.) how would that stop any of these shootings
actual real terrorists wouldn't have any qualms getting their guns illegally, and nor would anyone else who isn't a terrorist but just wanted to kill a shitload of people.
and finally, what have you done about it? have to researched all of your representatives and their stances on gun control? if you really want gun control, consider voting for gun control advocates in your next election. If you think that's how we stop these shootings, then hey, go for it, but do something that isn't just whining on a competitive gaming forum for an """""esport""""" that's going nowhere.
And for your troubles:
my personal favorites:
A person who was close to Nikolas Cruz called the FBI's tip line on Jan. 5 and provided information about Cruz's weapons and his erratic behavior, including his disturbing social media posts. ... In a statement issued Friday, the agency acknowledged that the tip should have been shared with the FBI's Miami office and investigated, but it was not.
Students who knew him described a volatile teenager whose strange behavior had caused others to end friendships.
Afterward, she called him a "broken human being."
The resources to stop him before he started killing people were there, either in the form of an at least semi-competent FBI, or a school that actually did its duty to its students. But neither did their damn job and now 17 people are dead. If you think banning guns will do anything to help situations like this, then try it, but I guarantee that these people will still suffer, and some of them are still going to decide to kill people, they'll just use trucks, or explosives, or knives, or whatever else their uniquely damaged minds can come up with, because they think that hurting people is the only thing they can do. Treating the symptom will not accomplish anything.
SpaceCadet
sure, but NiKo and karrigan didn't have their heads in their hands because they lost 70k, they had their heads in their hands because they lost a fucking major in the closest final in CS:GO history.
and also, for players like those on FaZe, Brady and Jordan are applicable comparisons.
SpaceCadetghadilliSpaceCadetLooks like 100K each for first place and 30K each for 2nd place finish.
Pretty big difference in prize money, I'd be holding my head in my hands too if I finished 2nd.
it's not about the money man, it's about winning a fucking major
I disagree to a point. Sure winning the major is a very huge thing but playing professionally is about making money and getting paid as well. You can't just discount the prize money or else why have prizes at all?
do you think that Michael Jordan played for the money? Or Tom Brady? Or hell, even b4nny? at this level, money is secondary to being the best in the world.
SpaceCadetLooks like 100K each for first place and 30K each for 2nd place finish.
Pretty big difference in prize money, I'd be holding my head in my hands too if I finished 2nd.
it's not about the money man, it's about winning a fucking major
pastaThat SPAM pastaThat THIS pastaThat NOODLE pastaThat TO pastaThat HELP pastaThat SKADOODLE
DreamboatI think this is referencing when Vega crushed NiP for Eleague17 major qualifier. Since both QBF and Vega were lesser known Russian teams
that would make this the third time, since envy got stomped by gambit at Columbus.
and i think it's a little disingenuous to point at a performance from nearly 4 years ago as a reason that a team should be anything but underwhelming now.
Spu
?????
mouz = russian ?
Our boy is in the most recent Thorin video
viper
in simple terms, this bug allows a program on a computer to access all of the memory on a computer without having to ask, meaning that it can see anything on your computer, including passwords, sensitive information, or anything else it might want. And because this is a hardware bug and not a software one, it affects literally everything with this hardware in it, including banking websites, google, amazon, or in short: everything. This means that an attacker can take any information that they want from anywhere that they want, and that's really really extraordinarily bad.
kaeos
that is unrelated to Meltdown or Spectre, the attacks in this thread. But it's never a bad idea to make sure that you aren't vulnerable to security holes, and if you are, how to mitigate them.
GrapeJuiceIIIhttps://youtu.be/APmoU74ZsG4
Have the foo fighters always been a meme band and I never noticed?
I was under the impression that comp changes were pretty close to complete from the way they talked about it after Jungle Inferno, guess not.
Oh well, it's only as bad as last year.
someone saying no