I honestly don't understand why so many people hate Cranberry. Maybe it is for something that he did/was doing before I met him, but I have personally never had a bad experience with the man. He is a very strong player who can adapt to any team strategy and is a great pickup.

Lets move beyond e-drama in the past guys, consider Cranberry for what he is now (an all-around amazing player) rather than your past opinions about him.

A+ pickup for a good IM team.

Ok guys calm down. TH is no longer a team. :P

Who the fuck are you????

#steelred

What the fucking shit?

Reminds me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MulLAfffQoQ

G110 keyboard :D
New jacket
A bunch of books
Clothing
Climbing tape

I don't know if you know me, but if you do then rate me please.
Thanks.

Also happy holidays!

4.) Scrims and matches only, no pugs, lobbies or pubs. LAN clips are accepted as well. If a LAN clip is submitted and there is a known cast of this that would work well with it in the video, please link me it!

All nice people :D

If you have the experience, you can't go wrong with this team.

The only problem for me is that I only ever get to play real games on a minimum of 60 ping, so practicing my deathmatch on 10 is kind of unrealistic.

I feel like this is the problem with the tf2 community :(

Everyone gets really angry and keeps grudges till the end of time, and only a few players can rise above.

I am certainly not innocent of keeping grudges/being unnecessarily mean, but its something that I think we could work on.

Everyone come on down to the feelings thread and spread a little love yo.

1 rule. ELE. Everybody love everybody

inb4 Tagg Gaaaaaay post

Or you could get a 960 GB SSD...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_ukaaavwEk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5AYPt3Z9fk&feature=youtu.be

480p pls

I use the targe if I only want to practice pipe aim. It just gives me some more resistance to explosions so i get more time to pipe people.

Hey I am in debate and I researched the shit out of this:

There are some really interesting arguments on both sides.

1. Gun Control laws are key in reducing firearms proliferation that escalates violence. Many gun related homicides committed every year are escalations. Obviously a large portion of the homicides are people who got a gun just to kill people, but many people only ended up using a gun for example to win a fight. (In Florida a man got in a bar fight, went home, came back 30 mins later with a gun, shot the guy he fought, and was acquitted due to Florida's "Castle Defense" laws). Gun Control solves b/c people like this would be unable to escalate the cycle.

2.a Stolen Guns (that means not borrowed, not purchased legitimately) accounted for 90.5% of firearm homicides in 2011. Some say that this would make gun control useless because 9.5% is a pretty low solvency rate, but remember that 9.5% is still almost 1000 people per year.

2.b I disagree with that assessment. A high percentage of "stolen" guns were originally purchased from a legitimate dealer or gun show. The laws that solve this would need to be structured such that those who purchase guns are forced to prove that they do in fact retain their guns. This would require a further bureaucratic structure, but since more than 60% of killers dispose of their gun afterwords, ultimately the amount of illegal guns available would shrink dramatically.

3. Many illegal guns come in from Mexico. There is not a way to solve this without doing much worse things (at least that I have read). This, however, is relatively small compared to the flow resulting from legitimate gun purchasers "losing" (selling) their guns away.

4. The idea that the right to bear arms would somehow stop some tyrant from taking over is nonsensical. The USA spends 41% of ALL MONEY spent on defense in the world. That is more than I believe the next 10 spenders combined. If you think that you and your fucking AK-47 are going to stop the more than 9000 M1 Abrams battle tanks in the US army (just as the tip of the iceberg), you are retarded. The fact of the matter is that unless you are allowed to purchase RPG-7s, Javelins, and Stingers at your local fucking Wal Mart then a tyrant with control of the army would very easily take over the country. There is no way to effectively solve that except for our structured government. Pretty much everyone who has tried to take too many powers has been shut down by the supreme court or congress or even the president. A tyrant is so unlikely as to be an impossibility. If you are worried about that small chance then you probably should stop going outside so as to prevent being struck by a rogue meteor.

5. Mass shootings are almost always carried out by people with a history of serious mental illness, substance abuse, and early trauma. We don't even understand the issues that many of these people face, so attempting to counsel them or "cure" them is probably a wild goose chase. We can't stop people from wanting to commit mass murder, but maybe we can stop people from being able to commit mass murder.

TL;DR: Strict gun control is good.

I am on a high open team (beat IM teams in scrims) this season as pocket and I am looking to really work on my pocketing skill. I feel as if I make some general mistakes in how I play and I believe that a well experienced pocket mentor would really be helpful in ironing those out and better supporting my team.

I will be here for the next two weeks (and possibly able to scrim a bit with my team despite the break) and available to review demos. Also I already have a lot of demos of past scrims and matches to review if needed.

Willing to take criticism and learn, hit me up.

http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198046177462
http://play.esea.net/users/477000