this guy is good
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197994364738 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:34099010] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:17049505 |
Country | Canada |
Signed Up | August 24, 2012 |
Last Posted | April 8, 2024 at 9:48 AM |
Posts | 1203 (0.3 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | G407 Hyperion |
Keyboard | G710+ |
Mousepad | PureTrak Talent |
Headphones | |
Monitor | HP shitstain (but i love it) |
lvl4do u have rice in ur cum or smth?
Okay
BonafideIsn't it "drink" cum, instead of eat? What a flawed question!
do you "drink" risotto
I didn't think so
good players from what Ive seen, should prolly just add people to their IM roster, keep the dream alive!!!
so right now there are 9 (8 if you dont count the last invite move up) fully paid teams, and 3 other committed teams. Im assuming ESEA would like to see at least 12 teams to warrant an IM divison so are there any teams coming out of the woodwork to hijack rosters? lets get it figured out people we got a day left
Dm monsters, def high potential for IM champions here, also nice guys to boot
this decision is so silly.
I can't believe that esea is considering removing an invite division when there are tons of teams with intent to play this season, why is it such an issue that these teams are "fully paid" before the registration that was laid out for them isn't even over yet, most of these teams are half paid and CLEARLY intending to play this season. I mean this all honestly just seems like ESEA trying to find an excuse to cut out tf2 and I dont know why.
if there does need to be a merge, it would be way better if the IM and open divisions were merged rather than having no invite division, if it REALLY has to come to that.
i want this map so bad! its so awesome
MonkeySuitlucrativelots of teams with 1-4 players paid up, need to finish paying up the fees so we can have an IM division fellas
I'm personally holding up 2 of them.
Sorry!
what the frig man!!!
lots of teams with 1-4 players paid up, need to finish paying up the fees so we can have an IM division fellas
so how many of these 51 open teams are actually gonna be playing?
lets get paid up boys ^__^
http://teamfortress.tv/thread/21833/esea-s18--tf2/?page=3#82
see bottom, willing to sponsor an open team, add me for inquiries
omniHuckSome people will take UGC seriously but the vast majority will leave 6s if they don't have the same level of competition that ESEA matches bring.Forgive me if I'm ignorant here (and I'm sure you'd love to hear what another euro has to say), but what necessarily stops any of you taking that same competitive drive you have in ESEA and using it in a different, maybe free, league? I keep seeing the subject of "ESEA has the best competition" but surely it's the players that bring that competition, not the league.
I understand that UGC 6s is a joke. Teams that are in plat aren't close to the level of invite. If you put the invite competition into plat, you'd weed out the shitties in no time. Just as a disclaimer, I'm not saying you should go to UGC. It's merely the only example I have to use.
I know that you guys love the end of season lan. I get that, lans are fucking cool. But I don't think they're necessary for the end of an online season. There are surely plenty of lans you guys could attend, right? I mean, GXL looked like a blast and there's gotta be lans similar during the summer period?
However, I'm not used to having a lan 3 times a year, so I might be missing the point entirely. I always think of lans as an event everyone can play in. So again, apologies for ignorance.
I mean I think a lot of people would love it of ETF2L ran an American division, think a lot of people's problems with moving away from esea is there wouldn't be the same level of organization in other American leagues (UGC) and you are right in saying the competition lies with the players, but it's hard to move around (once again) because we don't want to keep diluting the player base more than we have to, lots of people tend to just quit the game and not bother anymore if big changes like this have to be made, it's a tough position.
That being said, I think everything will be fine if esea won't be so hastey when it comes to the fees, it is an odd time of the year for sign ups but the competition outside of invite this season looks promising.
Another thing, I'm already sponsoring a couple IM teams but if an open team is thinking about not playing because they can't make their fees, please come talk to me and I'll help you out with your expenses, MAD LUXURIOUS OPEN :)
enigmafargobawlershow can u possibly act like league isnt p2w... yes you dont need to spend money ever but the game forces you to invest a lot of time to get GAMEPLAY ENHANCING champions/runes. the fact you can skip the time investment (which is equivalent to $$$) by spending real money means its p2w, full stop. if riot wasnt seeking to make money on people who want to pay instead of invest time getting the best runes and champions they would have a different monetization modelyou can't buy runes with money...
p2w doesnt mean that you HAVE TO pay to get the best runes/champions dont be intentionally dense
why are you all still arguing? its as enigma says, runes can't be bought with money so by you're definition of a p2w game, this means League is not....meta heroes that are "OP" mostly refer to the competitive scene anyways and like 80% of the time won't apply to casual games that everyone on this forum is playing.
so please, can we give this p2w thing a rest??