sleeepySo much of your "analysis" is wrong or agreeing with #38 that your post is useless.
looking back on it (and I wrote my post when I was extremely tired) I see that a lot of my post was actually agreeing with the post I was criticizing
however I still don't feel my analysis was wrong
sleeepyNot all criticism is individual. Your example of scouts overextending is a valid one for individual criticism. His example of damage not being followed up on applies to most of his team. There's nothing to disagree with.
I do not agree. That's why I find the call of "no one is following up on my damage" to not be super useful. If you're that general, the chances that said mistake will be fixed will just be too small. Instead, if you, say, told your passive scout to try to shoot whatever focus targets you called specifically, you'd be addressing that problem in an individual way, which is just more efficient.
sleeepyRegarding something not being your team's fault, he said not everything is a player's fault. You should always be able to see mistakes in your play other than poor DM, but somethings are near impossible to react to properly that it's not worth blaming someone over. For example, getting backstabbed can't be blamed on anyone if you didn't know the other team had a spy.
There are select few cases where something cannot really be blamed on your team at all (although fyi there are times where a spy is very likely, such as when holding/about to push last, and someone should be looking out for them), but the point is that is the exception and not the rule, and some players try to make it into the rule to avoid thinking critically about what they need to work on.
sleeepyUseless paragraph about repeated mistakes when his point was about not getting worked up about a one-time mistake. Obviously people are going to notice consistent problems and address them, the point is don't get mad when something random happens; this is TF2 after all.
fair enough, I guess I thought he was saying most mistakes were like that rather than talking about only the ones that were
sleeepy"Never stick closer to the combo as a roamer lol" - complete stupidity; irrelevant.
I fail to see how this completely true statement is stupidity. as for being irrelevant, it's irrelevant in the way that the whole post is irrelevant, in that it has nothing to do with bleakx, it's just that when someone is giving advice and it contains a piece of untrue information I feel like someone should point it out.
sleeepyIn the future, don't go so "ham" or at least do it in the right place.
what is a "right" place for it? a thread where the post I'm responding to isn't there?