I second this

I submitted a clip for the april top 10 that didn't make it in because even though the frag happened in april, I submitted it on like may 3rd (it happened the night of april 30th so it would've been basically impossible to submit it before may). the clip sorter guy told me it would be in the may top 10 if anything, since I submitted it in may. whast sense does that make?

and now, the may is probably cancelled, so it won't be in anything :<

solid team and nice guys, join up and go places

p.s. please stop solo ubering a soldier into the sentry on gpit b

should've used ggglygy for the match

1. you can't possibly, after being an admin for so long, get angry when people "only focus on the negatives".

2. most of the positive contributions made by ugc 6s were done by marxist, because he was the one who spearheaded the drive to make ugc 6s the "training camp", so to speak, for the higher echelons of the esea divisions. and you know what? this effort has been hugely successful- rather than being a mess of various skill levels in a joke league, many teams that want to improve but don't feel good enough for esea and don't want to pay the money have a place.

3. I don't see how you can trumpet all the positive steps taken by your ugc 6s admin and then not give him enough autonomy for a modest plan that does not hurt your league. it just proves that you're an egomaniac.

4. you are thinking really short term and narrowly if you believe that this plan doesn't eventually benefit ugc. if too many good teams get stuck in ugc because they just don't feel like they can commit to paying for esea, or they don't have a sponsor like even better teams do, this provides them a way to keep the divisions balanced and for turnover to begin, so the ugc 6s league retains its reputation as a good league for beginning to low/mid teams. and no, it's not a viable option to try to make a ugc 6s league be a true rival to esea, including a skilled top division. no league since esea has ever successfully competed in terms of invite and im teams flocking to them, and none in na will while it exists. the prestige and professionalism of esea is too great.

5. even if the plan didn't help ugc, it could only be seen as hurting it if one is openly hostile towards esea, which you are to a fault. 8 teams in the grand scheme of things is tiny.

tl;dr you dumb girl

I got a triple backstab as spy on this map in a new map pug

good map

tournaments and seasons are inherently different, I don't see why the map list/weapon bans need to be different either

if you truly believe that the two leagues coming together is a good idea, why did you block the efforts to make it so the top 8 ugc 6s teams would get free premium/league fees for the following season of esea

2 engis has been banned in 6s for precisely that reason

the top of the pyramid is always the smallest

6v6, and specifically esea 6v6, has a higher skill level than any ugc league. marxist, the head ugc 6s admin, has accepted this and has (very successfully) tried to turn ugc 6s into a transitional league for newer teams, the "base" that feeds into open

there's nothing wrong with the most prestigious league having the fewest teams, that's like saying "lol invite only has 8 teams so invite tf2 is dead"

god I fuckin hate death grips

im sorry but

fuck

I should clarify that my post was still 90% directed at infinite, you've at least TRIED to make logical arguments

well, the deletion of the thread might only be evidence of the policy in place, but that policy was set by the same 2-3 idiots that decided the ban in the first place, a group of people who have total autonomy, and could easily keep such a policy simply because they don't like criticism of anything they do

executive privilege brah

the only reason they won't discuss their cheat review process is because their cheat review process is basically "infinite thinks someone hacks, bans them"

fucking canada