http://cf-event.multiplay.co.uk/events/i46/tournaments/1126/match_results.html
http://cf-event.multiplay.co.uk/events/i46/tournaments/1126/standings.html

Mixup and LG won against all EU teams.
LG lost against mixup in the upperbracket final, so they got moved down to the lower bracket. They're gonna play against the winner of the other 'losers', either epsilon or TCM.

The winner of that game will play mixup for the grand finale.

LG already beat both teams ( epsilon and TCM ) on previous rounds, so we might get an all american finale.

I'm so afraid of a major choking. Hopefully won't happen.
What's the tournament format? I can't find the info on the i46 links. (or I read the wrong ones).

While I don't think we'll ever see videogames in olympics...
This argument doesn't really hold.

Not everyone in the olympics train as much as that chinese gymnast. I seriously doubt the basketball teams trains for 10 hours a day.

And of course, they train even more BECAUSE it's an olympic discipline.
There's already players who plays for thousands of hours of starcraft, or many FPS... And people who make a living out of Starcraft.

If there was an olympic discipline for those games, you can bet there would be some people who'd play/train 10 hours a day for years.

Even if they were willing to forget about the whole 'athleticism' thing that isn't in videogames... Olympics are always the same.
People were running the 100m in 1896, people ran the 100m in 2012.

Do you think people will still play TF2 or CS:S in in 2100?
Do you think many people would be interrested in a mario bros 1 competition in 2016?

The most popular videogames last like a decade.
Most games, even good games, don't even last 4 years.

They would have to change the discipline every other olympic.

#17 : Chess, on the other hand, COULD be in the olympic at some point ( not saying they will, just they could ). Chess have passed the test of time. It'll never die.

To have videogames in the olympics, we'd need a videogame so 'perfect' and challenging in all ways, that would keep people interrested for 10's and 100's of years.

Or to change the game every 2-3 olympics, but then it wouldn't be very serious ( plus, it'd open a huge gate to corruption, because how are they gonna decide which games make it? The game devs worth billions could have a word in the decisions ).

Everyone else on your team dies and you have to create a new team real fast to play the next season.

You have to choose your teammates classes between these 5 players with different skills/stuff.

1) Good overall player (all skills applies to all classes btw)
2) Best aim/movement/dodge in invite, but doesn't follow the plans/plays for himself
3) Worst aim/movement/dodge in invite, but smartest player, always know what do to and where to be.
4) A randomly selected mediocre pub players who's willing to do anything to learn and can train/scrim 70 hours a week if needed and will do everything you say (or, at least, try).
5) Great player, but mute, deaf, and can't read. He will try to play with the team ( unlike #2 ) but he can't hear anything you say, so he just goes with what he thinks the team is doing/what he thinks he should be doing. Can't talk either.

Restriction : Let's say there's no offclassing. You can't take, say, #2 as scout and say 'He'll be an awesome scout AND an awesome sniper'. He'll just be scout.

So, 2 scouts, pocket, roamer, medic, demo.
Who does what?
(You have to pick a class for yourself too obviously, and you need to make the best out of this team)

Your team is widely considered an 'all-star' team. And you said you'd beat LG (and everyone else) next season, being the #1 team.

Do you think there's any 6 players in the world that could beat your team?
Assuming a positive answer, who could do it? ( you can break every team to get the 6 players - as long as they don't play for your team obviously ).