i expect the max # of rounds played to be 3
kainoa's on dedoris
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198085994924 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:125729196] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:62864598 |
Country | Bhutan |
Signed Up | April 3, 2014 |
Last Posted | November 9, 2019 at 4:53 PM |
Posts | 720 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
i expect the max # of rounds played to be 3
kainoa's on dedoris
This is an idea that has been thrown out a lot, some people like to constrain overheal while some people like to give a damage penalty to the user so a sniper headshot does effectively 185 damage to him. At this point I doubt changes will be made until matchmaking comes out and it's easier to balance weapons using that data but I think it's a necessary change.
But yeah this belongs on the UGC forums probably, most of the discussion here is 6s based.
most of the people here are esea players, if you havent posted on the ugc forums already you should post there as well as your thread will get a lot more attention. gl
I think it would be cool to at least make an effort to do something with Mars - it has potential to be a very interesting planet and the failure of the last attempt to create a climate/geological orbiter means that we need more ways to study the chance that we can actually do something to Mars or its climate (which sounds far-fetched but terraforming is viable if we put some more research into it).
yea he hinted hard at some big changes to NIP
Quertdude, the guy asked "how do they know it's water". i said "they found small quantity of hydrated salt" because that's what they used to determine its water. i'm not disproving freaking NASA, what the fuck is wrong with you.
I apologize, I misread your original statement to be more in tune with your later comments (pessimistic). You don't have to be so rude though ("what the fuck is wrong with you"), that's a simple misunderstanding. Just asked you to fuck off and let people be happy. Sadly you couldn't do that.
Quertalso, i'm not a pessimist, just a realist who don't go around saying that there is life out there without having no clue whatsoever of what i'm talking about.
All realists are pessimists that don't like to be called pessimists. And I do have a very good clue of what I'm talking about thanks.
Quertthe mathematical probability of life is the exact opposite of what you said. considering the scale of the OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, exactly why i quoted the fermi paradox.
Why would you quote the Fermi paradox, that's against your point. Do YOU know what you're talking about? The paradox is a discrepancy between how much life we know we should have (a lot) and how much life we do have (we haven't seen anything) and says that it's because of a skewed value. Not that there isn't any, it just hasn't been seen because of that value.
Quertand bruh, "your blablabla application of the fermi paradox is blablabla not supported by the majority of the sicentific community".
I mean how you were applying the paradox doesn't fit with the definition of the paradox sooooooooooo
Quertnot only you don't have any fact or data to make that claim, i'm interested in knowing what kind of scientific community you're referring to. You're probably using the general consensus of ignorant people on the internet.
You don't have any data either, and I'm using the general consensus of the scientific community based on studies and peer-reviewed work.
Sorry for the tangent. Let's get back to what we were talking about. Photovoltaics?
damn, if we see a shuffle like anders said we could see some high value transfers, idk how high it could get
ok dude yea cool 20
anyone know if scream had input on his fee? i heard that was a thing for some people
damn dude he rebuts everything u say and u just knock it off to "not what i was talking about" and then u say u were joking in the first place??? lmao man up and accept it
and yea scream's fee is insane
quert is ur entire purpose in life to ruin peoples day?
while they did find "a small quantity of hydrated salt" the importance of the hydrated salt is twofold:
1. it proves that the RSLs are of liquid cause (thats a lot of liquid)
2. it proves that the liquid cause is in fact water and not a different liquid
not only are you wrong about the mars water you are also wrong about the probability of life:
1. ur the biggest fucking pessimist ive ever seen
2. the mathematical probability of life is pretty good considering the scale of the universe - there is an equation that is a good way to determine the amount of intelligent civilizations in our galaxy (and thats only INTELLIGENT and in our GALAXY) and the number varies from nah, we dont have shit and yea, theres a ton of people out there
3. the fermi paradox, countering the aforementioned equation, is applied for the most part to say that there are intelligent civilizations out there but some smaller value in the equation is preventing contact (the great filter theory), therefore your completely pessimistic application of the fermi paradox is not supported by the majority of the scientific community
fuck off and let people be happy
why do people hate g so much lmao
go memento mori!
woah this is damn cool
comedy gold