By your logic, since the invasion of Iraq happened under Bush, Obama is now not buzy helping rebels overthrow the assad regime in syria, or the intervention in libya never happened. the fuck dude

150 people died in those 17 attacks, all the separatist terrorist attacks don't even add up to double digit numbers in harm caused, and are for illegal explosives and weapon caches, from historical insurgent groups like ETA and IRA

congratulations you just deflected the plight of gay people world wide to "muh Republicans". but the fiasco of the "arab spring" and the US democrat government supporting the overthrow of existing governments and creating power vacuums for these backwards fundies to operate in bring great distress in the middle eastern countries it happened. That's racism. thinking your government is morally superior than the native leaders of a country and only making it far far worse by intervening and creating a hopeless situation for the people living there, and then have the audacity to call it an irrational fear if people abroad are worried you'd vote in another interventionist

well go from page 45-47 in the rapport and take a closer look.

the UK has the most terrorist attacks (103 out of 211 incidents) but doesn't give data under which category they fall in, skewing the stats since half of the incidents or not specified.
Jihad attacks were non existent, now they are the second largest category. Having people coming/ or returning from Syria with the training and conviction to do these attacks which by far caused the most death toll.

page 45-46: 66% of arrests are jihadist ellements with a whopping 687 vs 1077 although those include 144 non specified (134 from the uk which fills in neither category)
page 47: 198 Jihadi court verdicts filling the biggest category on a total of 527 with once again 109 non specified included thats nearly half, of all court verdicts,

How is this a fraction? What mental gymnastics are here at work?

In 2015, the majority of verdicts pronounced were in relation
to jihadist terrorism. The highest number of those (120) was
pronounced in Belgium.

My best friend's brother is scared, not because of what they read or not, but the fact he didn't get picked for an assignment in Croatia, but three of his colleagues did, and they died in the terrorist attack in Zaventem airport. You should have seen and heard him in the days after, as a father of two, being enraged that it happened and it might as well have been him. tell me how he is irrational and should look at the statistics.
People are scared because terrible things have happened recently, hey, 9/11 only killed 3000 people, less than die in car accidents, but that doesn't mean people were irrational to be in shock, or afraid, or angry and wanting vengeance?

Ever heard of "write for rights" by amnesty International? I have written some. What did you do, besides going on a pride parade, to feel good about yourself in a society that allows you to do so?

"The main concern reported by EU Member States continues to be
jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign
terrorist fighters, travelling to and from conflict zones. The attacks
in Paris in January and November 2015 represented a clear shift
in the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass
casualties on urban populations designed to induce a high state of
well-publicised terror. Other attacks committed by radicalised and
violent jihadist individuals that occurred in the EU - such as the
killing of two people in Copenhagen, Denmark, and the knife attack
in Nice, France which wounded three soldiers – both in February
2015 – underscore the diversity of the threat. Most jihadist
terrorist acts that took place in the EU in 2015 were performed
in the name of Islamic State (IS)."

if the number Islamic terrorism is just a fraction compared to the rest, then why is it the main concern of the EU and its rise the very reason the rapport was made in the first place? Did you actually even read it, because you didn't even city any number out of the rapport.

see, thats the real racism right here, you're more interested in your own people having slight discomforts or irrational fears that the rights will be taken away (if you would read the article lyreix linked, the program of pence was letting local level decide what they do. sounds the opposite of pushing federal USA law. Of course that first world problem is way way worse, then being victim to female genital mutilation, or being executed for "witchcraft" (still a legal reason to do so in Saudi-Arabia), "sodomy" or in other countries become a social pariah, or forced to emigrate because of harassment or threats from their own family. millions of people do not have the luxury in living in a society that tolerates them, if that is not an ethical issue, when you deal with other nations then what is with all the rage of American politicians on Putin's anti "gay propaganda laws" but close their eyes and ears when the rich investors from the united arab emirates come over.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/06/13/here-are-the-10-countries-where-homosexuality-may-be-punished-by-death-2/
Can you name me a fundamentalist Christian country in that list where "sodomy" is punishable by death?
and if you wouldnt want a christian fundamentalist country, why would you be ok with western powers directly or indirectly creating regions where sharia law is legal code?
this is not an issue of racism, on the contrary, as someone who cares for faggots worldwide, i would like everyone to be able to have their love without fear of reprecussions. And thus, i'm against any religion that enforces its archaic law on it's people. That's real LGBT activism imho.

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Europe

go down the page and sort on deathcount highest, and compare it to all other attacks or incidents. see a similarity? More deaths and wounded then from every other cathegory combined.
now, go sort on date from newest to oldest. well gee thats like uniquely islamist attacks in the last two decades.

now, why would people be antagonistic vs fundamentalist islam when in the last two decades terrorisms has caused so much harm?

Now, when and where was the last fundamentalist christian terrorist attack in europe or usa that compares?

on queer and faggot, i see them both as former sluts taken over by the ones it once targeted and become "our" word. Like how black people call each other nigga, or if i call my partner a faggot. the only person that allows you to be offended over a slur word is yourself.

isn't queer a slur?

"the wall will have a nice door for legal immigration" so i don't see an issue. and letting these things be a matter of local level instead of enforcing federal law along with things like education seems more liberal, as it removes intervention on federal level.
Also, try being a gay muslim lmao, i've read enough stories of gay muslims and convos that their own community in this country basically expel them from the family or worse, trying to "correct" them. seems better, than enforcing a local underfunded school in the countryside to install a genderneutral bathroom, becuase one person can just sue them for not being compliant with the laws. Also, Syria, Tunisia and Libya had a notorious underground gay community, guess what happens when the salafists got in charge.

rofl this is one of the dumbest things i've read. Euros are eugenetic nazis and congress isn't filled with millionares that take donations from all the banks, instead its filled with hardworking people (congrats that woukld be the only parliament in the world that has hard working people)

1. how is it antisemitism just cuz its a Jewish name, irish people were forced to change their last name, German people were forced to change their last name (esp during WWI)
oh yea double standards are always applied i forgot.

2. just cuz you aren't bothered to actually read the image and google the names and realise i replied to someone taking that show as actual truth while its now proven its cliton propaganda shows u just like to ignore facts while u focus on grammer errors noone gives a shit bout shows u feel u are so "intellectually superior" by being a noob in a buble...

http://imgur.com/a/cPE6z

Why is this interesting, look at the dating, this was right before john oliver did his "drumpf" show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnpO_RTSNmQ the 28th of february 2015 which got 29 million leftists views.

Aside from the misrepresentation and subtle manipulation that always is a hallmark at the daily show, and aside from the notion that john stewart should be denied his namechange by the logic, and for the next 400+ years his family should be referred to by everyone as leibowits to use the same logic. It's interesting that this "hitpiece" might have been spurred on directly by the clinton foundation.

Look at date on the letter februar 19th and it says his team was "working on it" and was hoping to have an answer by tomorrow. 28th just 8 days later john oliver did his "drumpf" show.

Working directly with the Clinton staff. Lmao

idk dude the first year of any civ game you can't have anything decent on mp cuz of OOS issues. As a big civ veteran, starting from II for playstation, i'm pretty wary if civ VI is gonna be actually good.