At first I thought this permaban was worse than when degu was banned for liking a tweet, but then I saw it was a g*rl g*mer and I thought damn that's kinda based
GJ admins
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198026442915 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:66177187] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:33088593 |
Country | England |
Signed Up | November 4, 2012 |
Last Posted | July 7, 2023 at 11:36 AM |
Posts | 187 (0 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
At first I thought this permaban was worse than when degu was banned for liking a tweet, but then I saw it was a g*rl g*mer and I thought damn that's kinda based
GJ admins
warriordragon12obama picked a guy with a phd in nuclear physics from stanford to lead the department of energy (who controls americas nuclear program)
trump picked a ford lobbyist
All government department heads do is make speeches and sign the papers that get put in front of them. You don't need to know what a quark is in order to do that. Not gonna lie, your comment is kinda cringe and gay, because it betrays a lack of knowledge of how the real world works. Do better in the future.
mustardoverlordSidenote: been a while since I set foot in a politics thread on this site and I’m pleasantly surprised at the socialism power levels here
Only socialists are dumb enough to post about politics on a team fortress 2 discussion site lol
I want Tulsi to win cause she's fuckin hot
Why do leftards only vote for men and not-hot women like Hillary and Warren? Gay much?
Imagine being a tiny little bit of a man. You wake up in the morning and throw back the napkin blanket from your matchbox bed. You almost role off and fall to your death. Feel around for the ladder with your rice sized toe. There it is. You climb down. Now you see an ant. The giant brute lumbering toward you. The smell of tiny man meat intoxicating the insect. You run, or more like you hop, towards the safety of a small crack in the wall not even the ant can fit in. Take a moment to rejoice and let your eyes adjust to the darkness. You're so small you can see every individual ray of light. Hungry from your morning adventure you decide to eat. Luckily a feast of atoms and other subatomic particles lay before you. You eat barely a third of a neutron and you're stuffed. That's when you notice you've accidentally begun to fall through the very fabric of existence. You grasp out but everything is too big to hold onto. You fall into the abyss.
It'd suck being a midge.
Getawhalenot sure if you're trolling or just actually don't understand but i'm here to help you out
https://twitter.com/danekevincook/status/1026915792187613184
if you just need your internet points, go off i guess
Ummm and what about that time you called Tagg a "jiggaboo" during a charity livestream, sweetie? Is using harmful racial slurs a funny joke too?
I once learnt a really potent magick spell from a traveling gypsy, BUT she warned me you must only use it when things are really dire and you have absolutely no other choice.
"Agios o Theos, Agios ischyros, Agios athanatos, eleison imas"
I'm not sure what it does myself, if you dare use it please report back!
hamahamwhere da fuck is frenchies and swedes
Who?
Here's an objective, unbiased list that everyone can agree on
Watching another man fucking a girl while you jerk off in the figurative corner..... YOU ARE A CUCK
prsnclimate change
I have good news
So I take it no one has an IQ even approaching mine? Makes sense, video game players are of lower intelligence than the general populace, and Team Fortress 2 players are lower still. Only brainlets would trust climatologists to know anything about climate projections, in the same way that only brainlets listen to economic predictions from economists.
Another internet debate won with ease.
fireindaarcade
It's weird how your graph is limited to only the last 800,000 years, despite the Earth being billions of years old. It also says CO2 levels were rising rapidly thousands of years before modern technology was even invented. Nice self own.
I do resent being called an idiot by a few of you though; I'm probably the smartest person in this entire thread.
https://i.imgur.com/pJWAl0c.jpg
140 IQ. Read it and weep. One. Hundred. And. Forty. I already know what you're thinking. You're thinking "b-but it's only an online IQ test, it doesn't mean anything", aren't you? That's just cope. You're shying away from the truth - you know you can't do better than me. You wouldn't even get close.
Anyone who replies to me with a proven IQ lower than 130 will be ignored from now on, you're simply not worth my time.
Rebitedon't argue with climate change deniers, they aren't worth the energy. Let's focus back on the fact that a shitty billionare is dead.
I haven't once denied that climate change is happening. Also, this thread has gone from shitting on some dead rich guy to a well-reasoned, thoughtful, and rigorous scientific debate. I have not only greatly improved the quality of discourse in this thread, I have raised the bar for all future threads.
You're welcome.
JarateKingWe've known every step of that process since the 1800s. John Tyndall discovered the concept of greenhouse gases in 1859. Svante Arrhenius calculated the impact it would have if atmospheric CO2 was doubled in 1896 (though it didn't factor in everything because climate science wasn't mature at that point, but it got the jist and observed the core concept). To my knowledge, no credible papers since then have suggested otherwise in either of these -- and they are simple enough concepts that if there was anything wrong about them, it wouldn't have taken us over a century to find out if they were actually false somehow (hint: they're true).
That said, we did manage to further support them beyond any doubt:
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/la09300d.html
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/sc05400j.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141868/
along with four-digits worth of other papers agreeing with the same
To support all of the above, we have papers meta-analyzing that 97% of climate scientists & papers agree with man-made (or anthropogenic) climate change:
https://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/metaAmong abstracts expressing a position on [anthropogenic global warming], 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.(for those who aren't knowledgeable about the science community, 97% is really fucking good and may as well be considered scientific fact).
tldr: man-made climate change is absolutely supported by the scientific community, and there is far beyond enough research and evidence to take action on it
Not one of those studies you cited proves that humanity has contributed any significant amount to climate change. CO2 levels and global temperatures were constantly changing well before modern man even existed. Since climate scientists draw conclusions that vary so wildly regarding the extent to which human emissions have affected the climate, an impartial observer might say that climatology is just a pseudoscience and none of them really know what they're talking about. You may as well claim that 97% of strippers endorse the man-made climate change theory and it would carry the exact same weight.