rk/angry rant I repeat every season
What a professionally worded response!
Anyway, here's how I see it; both "sides" have valid points. Deathanchor, nobody is saying your job is easy, or claiming that you're awful and should kill yourself (if they are they suck).
The issue is that you have the problems since you first started writing for ESEA. Take the time to proof read and fact check before you post something that a) you're getting paid for and b) is supposed to be the premier coverage of the division. Plenty of people have written articles for this site for free that are of similar quality.
Yes, there are 60 teams in open; however, you were only writing about 10. If you're going to only select a few, then why would you poke around all 60? Focus 10% of your time on each team, instead of 1.6%. Do some fact checking if you're going to make claims, or just don't bother making them.
I get that it's really tough to do a preseason evaluation of a 60 team division, because it's hard to say which team will be one to watch before any matches have been played and a clear upper sub division has been established. Because of this, I would almost rather see interviews of recurring teams, interesting players that have started over in open to try and climb back up, etc. rather than just reading a bunch of guesses (nothing against your opinions, but as you yourself has mentioned, it's hard to come up with anything concrete week 0).
My point is, all of this backlash may be really harsh and unnecessarily strong, but it's still criticism. Instead of just telling people they're wrong and you don't appreciate it, maybe you should do something different to get a better response? Just a thought.