I'd like so soldier, I'm a much better pocket than roamer.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198067253749 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:106988021] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:53494010 |
Country | Poland |
Signed Up | August 18, 2012 |
Last Posted | June 13, 2019 at 4:59 PM |
Posts | 1589 (0.3 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 1.99 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
400 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
60Hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Logitech G100s |
Keyboard | Microsoft SK-2085 |
Mousepad | Nova Gaming Master |
Headphones | Sennheiser HD 380 Pro |
Monitor | ASUS VG Series VG278HE |
Fucking crazy beast scout, I don't know his soldier but based on this guys skill he should be good there too.
I like how people think metalworks is better than snake or gran or via.
PhiTurinGuys what makes you think edifice will cause less upsets than gravelpit?
We don't entirely know if it's better than GPit yet, to be honest.
The biggest difference between the two is that I've designed Edifice with the competitive scene in mind while GPit was simply adopted by it, without being actually designed in the correct way.
Edifice is made in such a way that defenses on both A and B are viable, the iron man defense is much more viable, and B does not have a huge advantage to defend over A.
If it's going to be in any subsequent season, though, I suspect it *will* need serious testing otherwise some things are going to slip pass screening and make teams mad because they weren't fixed (due to no tests).
I'm not saying the map was poorly designed whatsoever (I actually like it), but everyone's complaints of G-Pit will apply to any A/D in that a med pick will always cause a lost round.
Guys what makes you think edifice will cause less upsets than gravelpit?
martenRoyceAnd then there's this gold from the UGC forums:
wills4545They just aren't used to somebody who won't mindlessly agree with the status quo. That's why Mustard has the occasional problem :P
I stood my ground, explained my case, defended myself in a polite manner.
If people actually understood my points (or even tried to), then the argument would barely have started.
All I said (and continued to say) was that I take a man at his word until proven otherwise. It's not fair to accuse someone of lying unless you can prove it. If Moose was lying, he'll get double the heat, but if it comes out he was honest, then I'll have nothing to say.
cause we cannot trust this "VAC" they are talking about. thousands and thousands get banned for using hacks while innocent :(
what is this
Wills I'm sure you realize this but, the attitude of complete trust in leadership has caused some of the most tragic things in the world, like the holocaust. /Godwin'd
WaldoVanguard edifice and quay in, gravelpit and metalworks out
What? Three maps in two out? Anyways, I don't want to have a map that has been tested in a few pugs and not by established team. Metalworks actually was tested by teams but Vanguard, Edifice, and Quay have all only been tested in pugs. They're almost confirmed to be shit.
Why is it under CSGO?
downpourTurinFog you sly dude, posting the prediction right when it ended predicting the exact score.he actually posted the article 3 minutes before the game started
clap
Well done fog, well done indeed.
Fog you sly dude, posting the prediction right when it ended predicting the exact score.
marmadukeGRYLLShow about for once we do the intelligent thing and instead of voting in an entirely new map fix the shitty things about the current maps?
cp_granary_fixed_respawn?
Watch edifice get voted in...then right out because it's the same thing every time.
YouMustMikebecause it's not a good map.
Alright, lets vote out G-pit and put in Ashville then?