unknownuser123
Account Details
SteamID64 76561197967818426
SteamID3 [U:1:7552698]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:0:3776349
Country United States
Signed Up July 21, 2012
Last Posted November 9, 2016 at 4:10 PM
Posts 2126 (0.5 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 ⋅⋅ 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ⋅⋅ 139
#107 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion
OdissiusIt's funny how ETF2L is completely cool with pushing FOV past 90, but the opposite with ESEA...

I suppose you wish we went back to vanilla TF2 with medlocks? You really don't know how to argue. What you like to do is get random facts together and hope that people will see them as "proof" of your message, when in reality they can easily show the gameplay problems with increased peripheral vision (all you need to see is a significant change in that opened up FOV to make a difference). Things can still get past, but there is a reduced chance that it will happen. Reducing this chance is a nerf to flanking. You can't deny that it can just because you personally have tunnel vision. Plenty of people can quickly notice and react to a small change in light. Stop trying to deny it won't affect gameplay.

posted about 12 years ago
#105 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion

Did you learn how to argue from talkshow hosts or something? You discredit peoples posts by saying that they're shit posters and calling them names without even responding to them. All you're trying to do is talk over them by flaming and whining and -fragging them with all your alts.

Also, no invite player wants the game changed because of your personal problem. You're still trying to push this for a person reason, which nobody gives a shit about. They might want to increase the FOV cap, but in no way would they want to associate themselves with an asshole flamer like yourself. Hence why there are more invite posts against you than for you.

Also, if eye strain affects your gameplay, then increasing FOV changes gameplay. Visual clutter affects gameplay. Tunnel visioning you affects gameplay. Having the FOV capped affects gameplay. I'd rather nerf you, the super amazing invite player who's being kept down by the 16 ammo reserve rockets and 105 real FOV cap, than give you the FOV buff.

posted about 12 years ago
#4 Problem with my new PC in Hardware

It is. Can't find a boot device, which is normally the harddrive. The only drive it can look for anyways since you don't have a DVD drive.

posted about 12 years ago
#5 Any decent sata 3 drives (non-ssd) in Hardware
Dave_Well I don't see the point of getting a sata II drive anymore when the prices are roughly the same as far as I've checked (not very far).

It shouldn't be a criteria. If you're getting a HDD, SATA # should never matter (I don't believe you can get a SATA I drive with over 750GB anyways).

posted about 12 years ago
#3 Any decent sata 3 drives (non-ssd) in Hardware

If it's not a SSD, no reason to get SATA III. HD speeds never hit the SATA II cap.

posted about 12 years ago
#2 TF2 update in TF2 General Discussion
Updated cp_gullywash_final1
- Fixed Red Capture Point 2 to prevent capping through a wall behind the point

That was such a fun exploit to stop caps. Oh well, good improvement.

posted about 12 years ago
#4 50DKP pubs nerfing Rocket Jumper & Market Gardner in Off Topic

Why should we care? If it's ruining their quality standards in their pub server, it's their right to do so. Plenty of crappy pubs skillban people anyways.

posted about 12 years ago
#52 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion
OdissiusFFGi hope you realize you're not exactly helping your cause when all you've really done in your thread is insult people, call them ignorant and act like you're superior to everyoneThat's what happens when people shitpost.Thread full of 'lol', 'this is stupid', 'huehuehue didnt reed'.

Says the shitty who has alts to plus frag himself. No way you get 3 plus frags 1 minute after posting.

1) you're still petitioning for ESEA to change FOV, not valve. You wll have eye strain every time you pub or scrim. Nobody ever sigyificantly pugs on ESEA. That feature only accounts for a small portion of the games you will ever play.

2) you haven't had anyone seriously agree that they get eye strain. It's your problem. Not anyone elses. You buy 3 monitors so that youcan get eyefinity fov. Because nobody else gives a shit about you eyestrain.

posted about 12 years ago
#29 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion
OdissiusIt's old news, I already know about that.

Anyway, the fuck is your point? The way the FOV is capped now is too low = eyestrain + headaches.

The fix I am suggesting fixes this problem and doesn't change gameplay. What is this resistance to change from the shitties in this thread?

It's eyestrain for you. If you don't want the eyestrain, back away from the computer or something. Change your ratios. A majority of people don't have this problem. It's not a problem to the majority of players. You bring up hardware but the reality is that the ratio is preserved (that is, your viewing area ratio with eyefinity will still be the same). Your eyestrain is your problem, not ESEA, not anybody elses, and you are the only person speaking for this eye strain cause. There are plenty of people who wanted (dunno about now) FOV increased for different reasons, but championing eye straining as the cause is just dumb. Nobody has to cater directly to your problems when you are an insignificant part of the population. Notice how nobody else is complaining? You're speaking for a population that only includes you and acting like you're the prophet or something and getting mad at people disagreeing.

So, how about you 1) talk about the REAL fov that you want (because eyefinity still preserves the same fucking view and wouldn't reduce eyestrain; you would have the exact same center monitor with or without the other two) and 2) stop calling everybody a shitposter and shitty when you yourself have no credibility/reputation in the community. You know you're getting posts calling you an idiot? Because you're acting immature. People disagreed with you, so what. They aren't shitlords because of that. I don't even understand how you could get into comp TF2 considering how pubbing would give you horrible headaches and eyestrain. You're depending on ESEA to provide you the super FOV you seem to need. You're criticized for that. Stop acting like everyone else is a lesser human because of that.

If you're autistic though, then nvm. Sorry.

Edit: Haha, somebody agrees with him, then he instantly labels the guy as reasonable. Biased fucking much?

posted about 12 years ago
#25 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion
OdissiusbrownymasterComplains about shitposts, then continues to shitpost and blame the community. If it's not a huge difference, stop fucking complaining about it. Obviously it's a difference if you're whining so much to change it.

PS. http://www.gotfrag.com/tf2/forums/thread/391383/
FOV IS NOT 90 FOR WIDESCREENS. WHOEVER HAS 4:3 RATIO HAS TO DEAL WITH IT. Get a widescreen if you want your 105 FOV.

do you even read?

Big difference in the sense that @ 90 FOV = I can't play TF2 vs. 105 FOV = all eyestrain/headaches solved.

No difference in the sense of having any effect on gameplay.

It's 2012, who doesn't have a widescreen?

Did you even read my link? Widescreen is 105 FOV at 16:9 ratio, 100 at 16:10. You're already playing at higher FOV. What you seem to want is over 120 real FOV which is a huge difference.

And you wonder why people are so antagonizing towards you. You disregard everything everyone says and take what you think as fact.

Another PS: You can get higher FOV by increasing your ratio on any monitor. Just set launch option settings with custom widths and heights (should only vary height, since you want to maximize width for max FOV). Do that if you want higher FOV. If your hardware makes it too hard to play, guess what other people are limited by hardware too in other ways. Deal with it.

posted about 12 years ago
#22 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion
OdissiusdomoI meant passed 100 fov, its fucking weird, ive tried 105-120 in the iT jump servers

How was i shitposting?

Because what you said was false.

Yeah bro there is a HUGE difference between 100 and 105 *rolleyes*.
shifty1gstupid
shitlord pls go

Complains about shitposts, then continues to shitpost and blame the community. If it's not a huge difference, stop fucking complaining about it. Obviously it's a difference if you're whining so much to change it.

PS. http://www.gotfrag.com/tf2/forums/thread/391383/
FOV IS NOT 90 FOR WIDESCREENS. WHOEVER HAS 4:3 RATIO HAS TO DEAL WITH IT. Get a widescreen if you want your 105 FOV.

posted about 12 years ago
#74 Br0s in shootmania in TF2 General Discussion
ehFkwhat does 1st get or is this just for fun?

$1000 I believe.

posted about 12 years ago
#23 interesting way to raise school spirit in TF2 General Discussion
mustardoverlordthere is nothing worse than white people bitching about "reverse racism"

What are your thoughts on affirmative action?

posted about 12 years ago
#16 ESEA PETITION to Implement Server-Side FOV to 105. in TF2 General Discussion

Haha complaining about hardware, why don't you buy everyone who has a shit PC and less than 60fps a new computer. Also buy everyone a 120 Hz monitor. Hardware is an accepted imbalance. Get over it.

Complaining about being able to lower FOV is also dumb. If people want to zoom, let them.

It's on valve to increase or decrease FOV, not ESEA. And they probably won't. Deal with your eyestrain, because everybody else has dealt with it since they started playing TF2.

posted about 12 years ago
#167 ESEA-Orang-eXplosion in TF2 General Discussion

You should have included what type they were (I'm assuming the pepperoni is just the logo).

posted about 12 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ⋅⋅ 139