CoD sux dix

so is a gtx 460 better than a gtx550ti/amd5870?

I'm really glad they used the 50Gb wisely for high res textures
http://i.imgur.com/Gr5SoiY.jpg

HD GAMES

anyone else have their main menu just freezing beyond belief?

necrid was crying about that earlier

Games I'm not playing include: See title of this thread

double.

http://imgur.com/iPM0KTB

Hmm..

WAIT SO IF I TURN DOWN MY GRAPHICS SETTINGS THE TEXTURES LOOK WORSE?????

ive told you kaneco was retarded before havent i

anyone have a extra ram stick?
i ordered without looking at minimum specs ;[

Sorry I didn't play the game nor intend to, I just copied over one of the most popular screens going around in forums. Anyway I also have these which apparently are with the game with everything in max settings.
http://imgur.com/a/yKMLR

Defending a game that is full of fake promises and more importantly has fake specs and restricts users who have less than 6gb ram is pointless anyway, the whole thing is a huge gimmick. A "50Gb of Fish AI" gimmick

Apparently the whole requirements are a gimmick

From what I heard you can use this ram fix found online and the game plays fine on 2GB ram
http://kickass.to/call-of-duty-ghosts-ram-fix-steam006-t8123711.html

As much as I like Call of Duty (I really do, it's probably the most fun fuck around game with your friends you can find - Battlefield is good for that too but idk I tend to take that game more serious), this game is absurd. I can play Planetside 2 at 720p at decent settings, only dropping to 20 FPS in huge 40v40 or bigger fire fights, and yet Call of Duty: Ghosts freezes at the main menu and never recovers for me - and even if it could I would somehow have worse FPS than Planetside 2. Amazing.

Also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E82ZkHTiVU&feature=youtube_gdata

saw this video online, apparently the size of CoD: Ghosts is a really dumb attempt to prevent cheating by making the game bigger than 32-bit cheat programs can handle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-A0VEG5KOo&;

i've seen that vid and it doesn't make any sense since there's plenty of 64 bit cheat programs out there, so if that was the real reason it would be pants on head retarded.

it's just more likely imo that they didn't change the fact that CoD on XBONE/PS4 is going to have 6GB of RAM reserved for itself and didn't bother to change that, throwing up an error when it doesn't have that amount even though it only uses 1/3rd of that ever.

OMG O.o

i wouldnt call those minimum requirements "insane"

They are insane considering that it still looks like a game from 2007. Also what the fuck is the deal with the 50 GB install when the ps3 version uses like 6 GB from the blu ray disc? Or maybe it was around 10. I don't remember. What justifies those requirements other than the fact that Infinity Ward is fucking awful at making a PC game now days?

You can since it looks like Cod 4 ffs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-A0VEG5KOo&feature=youtu.be

http://puu.sh/5aE9j.jpg
http://puu.sh/5aEb2.jpg

I dont really think they look the same, I can agree that the 50gb is a bit too much

MW3 was the last I bought after telling myself I wouldn't ever by a COD game again unless it had dedicated servers and fixed the cheating issue.

I think one helps solve the other, but after the cheating experiences of MW2 and MW3 I will not buy another CoD game. If this one actually has dedicated servers, then I suppose we could actually do something about cheaters (admins/mods banning them) but in the past games there was nothing you could do, and it was so rampant.

You could have at least tried a little harder by using an actual in game screen shot for Ghosts.

http://steosphere.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cod4mp-image026.jpg

http://media1.gameinformer.com/imagefeed/featured/activision2013/call-of-duty/ghosts/CODGhostsHandson610.jpg

Now I'll give you that Ghosts does look a little bit better, But is it really a big enough jump to justify the insane minimum requirements that IW is trying to push on you? Especially when you compare this to other games that look way better and came out up to about 2 or so years ago.

why are people still buying this game, its literally the same game with different guns and maps and the worst single player a game can offer, and the competitive scene is a joke, especially with the auto aim on console

Cod at max graphics, although I don't think it beats Crysis.

Crysis: http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/xqDbQD5Pa2c/maxresdefault.jpg

Cod: http://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/call-of-duty-ghosts-pc-screenshot-3840x2160-007.png

EDIT: I take it back ARMA 3 takes the cake

http://babysoftmurderhands.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Arma-3-PC-System-Requirements-Max-Settings-Graphics-3.jpg

Not exactly...

An E8200 would probably bottleneck a 550ti, wtf.