a key way to get your target audience to ignore your product is to have an ad that includes "before" and "after" photos that are either identical or fail to take into account the target audience altogether.
what exactly is the ad aiming for here? am I supposed to see the "after" photo and think, "oh wow!!! the glasses really do help! I've got to get a pair"?
idiots
http://i.imgur.com/tP8oLhH.jpg
p.s. I looked at the product despite the horrible ad and it claims it only works outside in bright sunlight. screw that.
a key way to get your target audience to ignore your product is to have an ad that includes "before" and "after" photos that are either identical or fail to take into account the target audience altogether.
what exactly is the ad aiming for here? am I supposed to see the "after" photo and think, "oh wow!!! the glasses really do help! I've got to get a pair"?
idiots
[img]http://i.imgur.com/tP8oLhH.jpg[/img]
p.s. I looked at the product despite the horrible ad and it claims it only works outside in bright sunlight. screw that.
I don't see the difference
I don't see the difference
FogI don't see the difference
target audience found
[quote=Fog]I don't see the difference[/quote]
target audience found
Thanks for showing me this, prolly gonna cop a pear
Thanks for showing me this, prolly gonna cop a pear
They should have made both pictures identical for real (the left is yellow and the right is red smaka darling) and then everyone would think they're colorblind and need these.
That would have been the smart thing to do I think.
They should have made both pictures identical for real (the left is yellow and the right is red smaka darling) and then everyone would think they're colorblind and need these.
That would have been the smart thing to do I think.
what is the science behind these
can we extrapolate it to create more colors, or does it only recreate colors already isolated by science?
what is the science behind these
can we extrapolate it to create more colors, or does it only recreate colors already isolated by science?
thank you goat, i'm glad you approve of my boredom browsing
eee, the science behind it seems like hokum to me, but who knows, maybe they actually do work to some degree. I'll never know because I won't pay $500 for them when they only claim they work at all in bright sunlight.
thank you goat, i'm glad you approve of my boredom browsing
eee, the science behind it seems like hokum to me, but who knows, maybe they actually do work to some degree. I'll never know because I won't pay $500 for them when they only claim they work at all in bright sunlight.
Are you 100% color blind to all colors?
I would think these would only even be technically possible for people with partial color blindness.
Are you 100% color blind to all colors?
I would think these would only even be technically possible for people with partial color blindness.
Deuteranomaly colorblind here. Having the most common form of colorblindness and still not being able to see a difference, I feel you on this. On another note, I've heard that the general consensus on EnChroma glasses is that they're bullshit, but who knows, they might work for some people.
Deuteranomaly colorblind here. Having the most common form of colorblindness and still not being able to see a difference, I feel you on this. On another note, I've heard that the general consensus on EnChroma glasses is that they're bullshit, but who knows, they might work for some people.
No, I don't have total colorblindness. I have trouble in the blue/green spectrum primarily, but reds are also affected to some degree. The closest representation is protanopia (here).
I do agree, kuza. I think the idea that glasses will correct for missing rods and cones is silly, but it most certainly wouldn't be able to do much for someone suffering from monochromatism.
No, I don't have total colorblindness. I have trouble in the blue/green spectrum primarily, but reds are also affected to some degree. The closest representation is protanopia ([url=http://www.color-blindness.com/protanopia-red-green-color-blindness/]here[/url]).
I do agree, kuza. I think the idea that glasses will correct for missing rods and cones is silly, but it most certainly wouldn't be able to do much for someone suffering from monochromatism.
smakersThe closest representation is protanopia (here).
Are you a Chargers fan, lol :D
I'M SORRY DUSTIN
[quote=smakers]The closest representation is protanopia ([url=http://www.color-blindness.com/protanopia-red-green-color-blindness/]here[/url]).[/quote]
Are you a Chargers fan, lol :D
I'M SORRY DUSTIN
nick
i am not a chargers fan but i don't understand the correlation without further elaboration
nick
i am not a chargers fan but i don't understand the correlation without further elaboration
yanno because their colors are yellow white and blue, and protanopia is pretty much yellow white and blue FUCK NEVERMIND OKAY
yanno because their colors are yellow white and blue, and protanopia is pretty much yellow white and blue FUCK NEVERMIND OKAY