-
Upvote
Upvoted
5
Downvote
Downvoted
Can he get banned on etf2l for cheating on tf2c?
posted in
TF2 General Discussion
dollarlayerquintoshim just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=quintosh]im just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot[/quote]
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
quintoshdollarlayerquintoshim just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair
i do understand being objectively skeptical to hacking situations and seeing where you could reasonably see assume the legitimacy of something and that it could be legit
but theres a certain point where that angle should stop seeing ambiguity and that angle is about 40 degrees
[quote=quintosh][quote=dollarlayer][quote=quintosh]im just saying except for a couple rockets it doesn't actually look like an aimbot or wallhack (after knowing that he is using a prediction aimbot you could only assume the others are aimbotted too), stv demos aren't lag compensated so you'll find soldiers swipe into the direction of a player after firing a rocket a lot[/quote]
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair[/quote]
i do understand being objectively skeptical to hacking situations and seeing where you could reasonably see assume the legitimacy of something and that it could be legit
but theres a certain point where that angle should stop seeing ambiguity and that angle is about 40 degrees
LOL. It's projectile silent aimbot. You can only assume lag compensation if his cross hair at one point or another was pointed at the player. But when you have rockets coming out at 30-40 degree angles and he didn't move his crosshair to that player in the second prior or second after the rocket, its pretty easy to detect and understand that its a silent projectile hack. He has the aimbot fov cranked very high so it look blatant.[/quote]
completly misinterpreted what i said. thats why i said "except for a couple rockets" but ok, just trying to prevent people from reporting false cheaters because they saw a soldier's rocket not come out from the crosshair[/quote]
i do understand being objectively skeptical to hacking situations and seeing where you could reasonably see assume the legitimacy of something and that it could be legit
but theres a certain point where that angle should stop seeing ambiguity and that angle is about 40 degrees
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.