[quote=GoaskAlice]
all soldiers will agree with me that soldiers can only use 4 rockets with any rocket launcher besides black box
[/quote]

I'd like to see some more evidence on this topic, seems like you're jumping to conclusions here.

[quote=GoaskAlice]all soldiers will agree with me that soldiers can only use 4 rockets with any rocket launcher besides black box[/quote]
smh

https://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Liberty_Launcher
https://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Air_Strike
https://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Beggar%27s_Bazooka

[quote=GoaskAlice]if you look at any games recently (froyo vs evl) arekk got 52 kills once but hes like not even better than rando? so why can he out kill him, he's actually factually not better than -blaze either so why can he factually out number his killing ratio[/quote]

this argument doesn't make sense because you can just replace rando/blaze with a medic, like nursey for example, and say "why didn't nursey have a better kd than arekk?" it's about the role the class provides, not the amount of kills they can get, and the soldier cass doesn't suffer in providing impact in a game unless you're a worse player

.

.

[quote=GoaskAlice][quote=corsa][quote=GoaskAlice]if you look at any games recently (froyo vs evl) arekk got 52 kills once but hes like not even better than rando? so why can he out kill him, he's actually factually not better than -blaze either so why can he factually out number his killing ratio[/quote]

this argument doesn't make sense because you can just replace rando/blaze with a medic, like nursey for example, and say "why didn't nursey have a better kd than arekk?" it's about the role the class provides, not the amount of kills they can get, and the soldier cass doesn't suffer in providing impact in a game unless you're a worse player[/quote]

i think youll find [b][u]statistically[/u][/b] that youre wrong this has no relevance to medics or scouts this is about soldiers
your comparison makes absolutely no sense where as mine does and also its like if arekk gets 60-100 ping vs a scout with 5-10 ping obviously the other scout will do much better than arekk because that scout has 5 ping right get me[/quote]

i will ignore the fact that you outright said "your comparison does not make sense whereas mine does" and didn't follow up with an explanation lmao.

yours actually doesn't make sense because [b]statistically[/b] (xd) medics get fewer frags. that sounds stupid to say right? it is because medics have insanely huge impact on the game obviously, and [i]good[/i] soldiers do too. you used blaze as an example earlier, and it is clear that blaze has large impact on the game, in fact more than some other players that played in grand finals despite his "shitty class" even though he had some pretty bad statlines i think. freestate, despite getting low amount of frags throughout almost the entire grand finals, has quite a bit of impact. what i'm saying is there is no world where you can use stats as an argument for these type of suggestions, because good stats does not always equate to large amount of impact, while bad stats does not always equate to no impact.

i honestly can't tell if you're directing that ping concept towards me directly because i get low ping, but when i get 60 ping to servers that aren't IL from my house, i barely notice a big enough difference on scout to where it hinders my abilities.

.

i agree corsa needs to learn from the best, can you be his mentor?

If he actually doesn't know who corsa is then that's great because it just means that corsa is so used to defending his 5 ping that he automatically has his defenses at the ready anytime someone brings up ping

Soon we will be living in ur world Goaskalice