Now that it is legal again and includes two more countries, North Korea and Venezuela, what are your thoughts on it? Looking to RESPECTFULLY discuss ideas and reasons for it, against it, or just indifferent.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/04/supreme-court-permits-full-enforcement-trump-travel-ban.html
trump
wow this thread is totally going to have a detailed and unbiased discussion on the effectiveness and ethics of a muslim-majority country travel ban and won't just be a pile of -frags for the minority opinion
wow this thread is totally going to have a detailed and unbiased discussion on the effectiveness and ethics of a muslim-majority country travel ban and won't just be a pile of -frags for the minority opinion
This is a misleading title, whether it be by OP or by Fox News. The Supreme Court only ruled that the ban would be allowed to be in effect while the legal battle continues and in no way have the Supreme Court taken a side on this travel ban
im gonna make some fish for dinner today hmm what do u guys think?
thanks for the article i didn't read and the opinion of yours that you didn't share OP
oh thank god, sick and tired of those muslims shooting up our schools and concerts!
yahooim gonna make some fish for dinner today hmm what do u guys think?
what kind of fish
what kind of fish
dot_oh thank god, sick and tired of those muslims shooting up our schools and concerts!
When they actually are destroying schools and disturbing public events in Europe (Nice attack in 2016 killed almost 90 people and injured 474 more, done with a truck), destroying property and raping women?
I don't agree with President Trump on a lot of things, and this is defiantly a questionable course of action, but at least he's trying to protect the U.S. citizens.
When they actually are destroying schools and disturbing public events in Europe (Nice attack in 2016 killed almost 90 people and injured 474 more, done with a truck), destroying property and raping women?
I don't agree with President Trump on a lot of things, and this is defiantly a questionable course of action, but at least he's trying to protect the U.S. citizens.