https://imgur.com/a/AVCrY1O
Do you believe that slurs (racist, transphobic, homophobic, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported?
["Yes, I believe that slurs should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for using slurs in scrims.", "No opinion."]
Do you believe that harassment (threats to dox or harm, targeted hate speech, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported? [NOTE: "Trash-talk" is NOT harassment.]
["Yes, I believe that harassment should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for harassing others in scrims.", "No opinion."]
Do you believe that excessive toxicity (personal attacks, offensive behavior, verbal abuse, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported? [NOTE: This is NOT "trash-talking".]
["Yes, I believe that excessive toxicity should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for being excessively toxic in scrims.", "No opinion."]
https://imgur.com/a/AVCrY1O
Do you believe that slurs (racist, transphobic, homophobic, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported?
["Yes, I believe that slurs should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for using slurs in scrims.", "No opinion."]
Do you believe that harassment (threats to dox or harm, targeted hate speech, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported? [NOTE: "Trash-talk" is NOT harassment.]
["Yes, I believe that harassment should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for harassing others in scrims.", "No opinion."]
Do you believe that excessive toxicity (personal attacks, offensive behavior, verbal abuse, etc.) should be moderated in scrims when reported? [NOTE: This is NOT "trash-talking".]
["Yes, I believe that excessive toxicity should not be allowed in scrims", "No, players should not be punished for being excessively toxic in scrims.", "No opinion."]
Scrims are generally voluntary activities so I don't see why anyone should be banned when they will eventually be filtered out by teams not scrimming against toxic idiots.
The only thing I believe should be bannable is a sustained history of targeted harassment which generally will never happen in the space of a single scrim.
Scrims are generally voluntary activities so I don't see why anyone should be banned when they will eventually be filtered out by teams not scrimming against toxic idiots.
The only thing I believe should be bannable is a sustained history of targeted harassment which generally will never happen in the space of a single scrim.
dude i dont even know how you define a scrim at this point. like i get that its two teams playing against each other, but since its not mandated and controlled by rgl, how do they know if its a scrim or not? how are you supposed to moderate something that you have no fucking control over? do pugscrims count for moderation under the rgl bible? what if there are ringers involved? theres no consistency here man
the thing that makes this survey even more worthless is that they tack "if reported" onto the end of every question. if someones being reported for harassment, i dont think it mattered if it was in a scrim or in steam dms or anything else before, so why do they need to figure out if people want to be able to harass others in scrims now? it seems to me that rgl is just trying to get some in to start moderating scrims for whatever reason now.
dude i dont even know how you define a scrim at this point. like i get that its two teams playing against each other, but since its not mandated and controlled by rgl, how do they know if its a scrim or not? how are you supposed to moderate something that you have no fucking control over? do pugscrims count for moderation under the rgl bible? what if there are ringers involved? theres no consistency here man
the thing that makes this survey even more worthless is that they tack "if reported" onto the end of every question. if someones being reported for harassment, i dont think it mattered if it was in a scrim or in steam dms or anything else before, so why do they need to figure out if people want to be able to harass others in scrims now? it seems to me that rgl is just trying to get some in to start moderating scrims for whatever reason now.
IMO they literally just release the surveys because they're going to start moderating scrims and they can say "A sizable portion of people responding to our surveys said they wished to have more moderation in scrims."
It won't even need to be a majority for that to be "true," since there's no reasonable answer for what a sizable portion can be defined as.
That or they put everyone who answers no on the admin shitlist or something.
IMO they literally just release the surveys because they're going to start moderating scrims and they can say "A sizable portion of people responding to our surveys said they wished to have more moderation in scrims."
It won't even need to be a majority for that to be "true," since there's no reasonable answer for what a sizable portion can be defined as.
That or they put everyone who answers no on the admin shitlist or something.