The first 40 seconds of an 80 second video was intro
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198016661425 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:56395697] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:28197848 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | September 1, 2012 |
Last Posted | December 14, 2017 at 1:59 PM |
Posts | 1182 (0.3 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
Though you have a point I think its very different to target someone personally to insult and to target their loved ones.
Just IMO
I guess it's a pretty tough decision of whether to accept people telling our loved ones they should die of cancer as an acceptable form of shittalk.
Plankthrone never ceased to disappoint even when things went a bit sour.
he's chill as fuck and he aims like jesus
pick him up gamers
I think u need to check your wording
botmoderegardless of delays, there would not be a sub in place of shade which heavily altered the result of the match
the map was 3-0 at half time, had shade been playing we would've seen a much different game
Agreed
komorebiAvastShade may not have been unable to rejoin but you're all delusional if you think delays just as bad if not worse didn't happen at LAN.
But a single player's internet troubles, or playing with a sub, wouldn't have ever been an issue.... Also delays have been basically non-existent at the last four or so lans, especially compared to season 11/10 and before.
Are we remembering the same LANs
Shade may not have been unable to rejoin but you're all delusional if you think delays just as bad if not worse didn't happen at LAN.
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ omw to my keyboard to make quality posts ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Toaoo: circlejerks exist everywhere, the weak always unite
I thought i had a good computer bc i could run tf2 on dx9 before but after the update i couldnt :(
I'm not arguing that.
I just wanted to know from an admins mouth that he had been investigated and the evidence was/wasn't strong enough to convict.
Sure they can make mistakes or a case can be reevaluated but as long I know they haven't just ignored the outcry then I'm fine with it and I personally can't complain if they've already run him through the process with reasonable competence (my own personal conclusions aside since I'm not an admin obv).
Well then that's all I needed to hear dude.
Case closed for me unless I see something indisputable.
That was easy.
So I guess instead of actually just investigating someone that so many appear to think is hacking and then clearing them and moving on we're just going to shift the conversation to tone policing and how "ridiculous" the claims appear to be?
If this was one person or only a select few people calling someone suspicious without much common outcry I would understand.
But if you have loads of people both from lower and higher levels calling for an investigation with mountains of available footage and potential resources being ignored or even mocked instead of just reviewing the case then I really don't know if I'm dealing with real people or trolls.
Seriously just investigate it and move on, if he's clean he's clean, its that simple. IDK why we'll just let it linger.