Comparing anyone on that team to kuestif is like tier -100 level mistake Uni, including yourself.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198016661425 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:56395697] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:28197848 |
Country | United States |
Signed Up | September 1, 2012 |
Last Posted | December 14, 2017 at 1:59 PM |
Posts | 1182 (0.3 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
I don't know anyone on this team personally but train is pretty cool.
But without Karova they cannot receive my endorsement bc i love Karova.
Edit:
Besides that they're a prettty solid team that can probably improve and compete in IM with the right gamer.
Is this MvM with gun skins? Maybe I'm a bit confused.
In addition can any class use any weapon now in that mode?
Tower defense TF2 is my favorite type of TF2
What a shitfest
And now the hate wagon reverses.
Just another day on the TF.TV forums boys.
I like Cyntro a lot.
Why?
Because he's a med main that actually plays this game and isnt terrible or a dick while looking to improve.
Med mains that are all of these characteristics are hard to find nowadays.
He is also a super cool dude.
Thank you,
God Bless
idk about you but donating lots of cash seems like a pretty big contribution to a community
mustardoverlordon the one hand nursey has like 300 hours past 2 weeks on steam like every week
on the other hand, pizzagon is by far the most boring team to play against in IM
Nursey only has like a legitimate 130 (lolololol) the rest is cookie clicker idling bc for some reason Nursey and Aim love that fucking game.
squidb4nny no longer comfortable supporting our team due to ash’s repeated immature and offensive comments made on stream. The refund is understandable, justified
way to stand by ur teammates
l o l
Now you're getting into a different argument of where the money should come from.
I'm simply stating that parents should have these benefits and we as civilized people should work to provide them for others and ourselves/families.
CHERRYAvastNot being denied. Having to be able to provide for them.CHERRYAvastThe reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 1 million dollars or around 900,000 euros.Social justice != fairness.
There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.
Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?
Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.
And yeah, if you can deny access to culture for people with lower income you can also deny them having a children if they cannot afford raising one.
You don't have to convert anything to euros as I'm using dollars for more often than them, but don't think that cost of raising child being high are unique to the States. It's generally a big cost as the child has similar cost of living to you and the harder it is to sustain where you live the harder it is for you to help others who depend on you.
When I was working last summer I was earning 10PLN or $2.68/hour. Cost of raising a child here is 190,000PLN where it's $245,000 in the States according to U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But that doesn't count in everything that's not necessary that child might want like Game Boys etc. so I'd say those numbers are pretty close compared to a median pay.
You can't possibly compare people being denied luxuries to being denied the right to reproduce.
Is this real life.
I'm all for public education, hospitals etc. though - stuff that directly benefits children and gives them an equal start in this competitive world.
EDIT: I also think that everyone has some social responsibility, but whether they fulfill it or not should be up to them. I'm doing my best myself to do what's beyond what is forced upon me even though the later sometimes feels like a huge burden especially for those on low income looking to start business.
If I start a company I'm paying 400PLN every month before I make any income. How is that fair? Cause it's a direct consequence of having all the benefits I will never use. When I don't hope to earn more than that I'm losing money by working or do freelance work illegally.
There will always be people at the bottom of the totem poll under any capitalistic society, regardless of social policy.
The bottom of the totem poll will always be extremely hard pressed to provide for their children, even with social infrastructure.
If you choose to deny parents certain financial stipends/benefits for raising children even if you are not outright denying them the right to have kids you are through economics denying lower economic classes the right to have children.
Bad is bad whichever way you put it.
CHERRYAvastThe reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 1 million dollars or around 900,000 euros.Social justice != fairness.
There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.
Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?
Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.
And yeah, if you can deny access to culture for people with lower income you can also deny them having a children if they cannot afford raising one.
You don't have to convert anything to euros as I'm using dollars for more often than them, but don't think that cost of raising child being high are unique to the States. It's generally a big cost as the child has similar cost of living to you and the harder it is to sustain where you live the harder it is for you to help others who depend on you.
When I was working last summer I was earning 10PLN or $2.68/hour. Cost of raising a child here is 190,000PLN where it's $245,000 in the States according to U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But that doesn't count in everything that's not necessary that child might want like Game Boys etc. so I'd say those numbers are pretty close compared to a median pay.
You can't possibly compare people being denied luxuries to being denied the right to reproduce.
Is this real life.