Apologies, I used the wrong number from a different study. Edited my post.

Actually you need to educate yourself because common law marriage still requires a basis of "informal marriage" meaning besides just cohabitation there has to representation that the couple living together are married or planning to be married.

For example: if you go to a restaurant with your gf/bf and are not formally married but are living together and sign yourselves in as Mr. and Mrs. X then you have declared yourself married under common law in Texas.

So no, common law marriage will not be affected by this ruling unless roommates of the same gender start saying they're married/getting married.

Remember kids, don't yell at people about things unless you know what you're talking about.

The reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 245 thousand dollars or around 220,050 euros.

There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.

Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?

http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/18/pf/child-cost/

Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.

Easily capable of playing IM level demo, probably scout too as his DM is pretty damn good.

Just ensure he wont kill your team.

Extra emphasis on ensuring he does not kill your team.

It's the supreme court's job to ensure that the states do not violate the civil rights or liberties of citizens of the US using judicial review.

Welcome to Federalism.

Why would they lose federal funding for their social services over the ruling.

Federal funding for churches set up a decade ago is only allowed because the money does not violate the Establishment Clause because it goes towards social services provided by churches and not actual church proselytization.

Churches can still marry or not marry whoever they want, that service is completely separate from the social services/community volunteering churches provide and the federal money that aids them in that.

If you think Alaska is less conservative than Texas you are misinformed.

In addition to the petroleum industry being large in Texas, high tech industries in Texas are likely going to equal or surpass California's in the next decade, I'm sure you've all heard of TI but theres other large biomed and engineering companies like Abbott Labs and ATI.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP#/media/File:U.S._GDP_by_state_2008_(current_dollars).jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP

We do in fact, need Texas really bad.

If you scrim sun-thurs for two hours, then you have two matches a week you are looking at about 15 hours a week.

Or if you have one match and scrim for one hour each day or even less you have sub 8 hours a week

CSGO's shit community bleeding into TF.TV as evidenced in this thread.

:strawberry:

The Grimest

If you think an unknown demo doing 740 dpm with 20% heals and 30% sticky accuracy is not hacking you might need to take a quick logic seminar.

edit:
I've played against this polaroid guy too, is clearly hacking based off my own experience and especially in light of this.

I remember playing against that bo4r kid once and was definitely thinking he was hacking.

He somehow tried to explain his ungodly tracking and prediction of my team's every movement by saying he backed up for some gold team. Knew it was total bullshit.