Yeah I just jumped from 2 stars to 3 and a third when new system got inroduced.
Does it mean I'm a quality poster?
Anyways I'm happy now that aim- lost all of his :D Let's not reward shitposting
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198025176040 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:64910312] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:32455156 |
Country | European Union |
Signed Up | April 12, 2014 |
Last Posted | January 8, 2022 at 1:48 AM |
Posts | 1669 (0.4 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
Yeah I just jumped from 2 stars to 3 and a third when new system got inroduced.
Does it mean I'm a quality poster?
Anyways I'm happy now that aim- lost all of his :D Let's not reward shitposting
skeejBonafideSpeaking from experience, do not take drugs unless you are in serious health/mental problems and there is no other way. Life can be hard sometimes but pills are absolutely not the answer.
If there's no negative side effects, why not?
(disregarding the fact that medication without side effects barely exists, for the sake of discussion)
Because this is supporting charlatans if you refer to the Alleradd :p
Otherwise there rarely are no side effects, but if it works there's no other reason not to take it if you need it.
SideshowWhat an incredible game! So hyped for sdb at LAN, and yeah regarding viewer numbers we seem to be increasing this season - 1000 for a good game in EU Prem is awesome, and 1000-1500 for these showmatches as well! Sick times for TF2.
oblaI'm not sure if this is a known issue. Paint can images.
http://i.imgur.com/tyqf220.png
They come actually as all brown, just colored by game.
I will recolor them though.
Now let's get Shadowburn some better screen.
Listen to this wise man:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f68afLSw13Q
We all know why you've won.
THIS IS SO SICK/ Looking forward to the cast.
AvastNow you're getting into a different argument of where the money should come from.
I'm simply stating that parents should have these benefits and we as civilized people should work to provide them for others and ourselves/families.
To be honest I also don't think richer than us should be forced to share. They should feel the need to do it, but if they don't then well fuck. I don't need anything from them.
AvastCHERRYAvastNot being denied. Having to be able to provide for them.CHERRYAvastThe reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 1 million dollars or around 900,000 euros.Social justice != fairness.
There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.
Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?
Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.
And yeah, if you can deny access to culture for people with lower income you can also deny them having a children if they cannot afford raising one.
You don't have to convert anything to euros as I'm using dollars for more often than them, but don't think that cost of raising child being high are unique to the States. It's generally a big cost as the child has similar cost of living to you and the harder it is to sustain where you live the harder it is for you to help others who depend on you.
When I was working last summer I was earning 10PLN or $2.68/hour. Cost of raising a child here is 190,000PLN where it's $245,000 in the States according to U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But that doesn't count in everything that's not necessary that child might want like Game Boys etc. so I'd say those numbers are pretty close compared to a median pay.
You can't possibly compare people being denied luxuries to being denied the right to reproduce.
Is this real life.
I'm all for public education, hospitals etc. though - stuff that directly benefits children and gives them an equal start in this competitive world.
EDIT: I also think that everyone has some social responsibility, but whether they fulfill it or not should be up to them. I'm doing my best myself to do what's beyond what is forced upon me even though the later sometimes feels like a huge burden especially for those on low income looking to start business.
If I start a company I'm paying 400PLN every month before I make any income. How is that fair? Cause it's a direct consequence of having all the benefits I will never use. When I don't hope to earn more than that I'm losing money by working or do freelance work illegally.
There will always be people at the bottom of the totem poll under any capitalistic society, regardless of social policy.
The bottom of the totem poll will always be extremely hard pressed to provide for their children, even with social infrastructure.
If you choose to deny parents certain financial stipends/benefits for raising children even if you are not outright denying them the right to have kids you are through economics denying lower economic classes the right to have children.
Bad is bad whichever way you put it.
I'm not denying them anything. I'm refusing to be forced to sponsor other people when I'm not rich by any definition either. They can have a child if they want. There are many low income parents there. The kind that couldn't be as poor in any way if they were employed legally in the States and there are not that many benefits for them.
When you don't have money you make your own cream cheese by mixing jam with natural yogurt.
But obviously we have different views on this. I see where you're coming from and I understand your point just don't agree with it. However it's such a core issue that I doubt we can convince anyone to our opinion in that matter.
saamhttp://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/
Half of pregnancies are unplanned. I think the fact that each adoption will be by two people who make a conscious decision to raise a child would outweigh a lack of hormones anyways,.
Declined from 89% to 79% among teens aged 15–17 years.
Increased from 79% to 83% among women aged 18 and 19 years and from 59% to 64% among women aged 20–24 years.
Declined in lower age group and increased in higher one.
It seems like it's the same generation making those mistakes.
Geknaiirnvm thank you pankeyman
http://i.imgur.com/rHfZD1z.png
This is the effect you're going after by following this workout plan:
https://cdn2.cdnme.se/2866462/6-3/2014-08-12-2023_53ea5b91ddf2b36596559eef.jpg
I heard an argument of lacking a role model.
Would you say that lesbians adopting girls and gays adopting boys would be enough of an example for a growing child?
AvastCHERRYAvastThe reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 1 million dollars or around 900,000 euros.Social justice != fairness.
There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.
Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?
Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.
And yeah, if you can deny access to culture for people with lower income you can also deny them having a children if they cannot afford raising one.
You don't have to convert anything to euros as I'm using dollars for more often than them, but don't think that cost of raising child being high are unique to the States. It's generally a big cost as the child has similar cost of living to you and the harder it is to sustain where you live the harder it is for you to help others who depend on you.
When I was working last summer I was earning 10PLN or $2.68/hour. Cost of raising a child here is 190,000PLN where it's $245,000 in the States according to U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But that doesn't count in everything that's not necessary that child might want like Game Boys etc. so I'd say those numbers are pretty close compared to a median pay.
You can't possibly compare people being denied luxuries to being denied the right to reproduce.
Is this real life.
Not being denied. Having to be able to provide for them.
I'm all for public education, hospitals etc. though - stuff that directly benefits children and gives them an equal start in this competitive world.
EDIT: I also think that everyone has some social responsibility, but whether they fulfill it or not should be up to them. I'm doing my best myself to do what's beyond what is forced upon me even though the later sometimes feels like a huge burden especially for those on low income looking to start business.
If I start a company I'm paying 400PLN every month before I make any income. How is that fair? Cause it's a direct consequence of having all the benefits I will never use. When I don't hope to earn more than that I'm losing money by working or do freelance work illegally.
AvastThe reason people receive tax benefits for having kids is because the cost of raising a child to age 18 in lets say for example, the United States, is estimated to be approximately 1 million dollars or around 900,000 euros.
There is no unfairness considering both people will come out equal as the person without children isn't having to support an economic parasite for 18 years. In fact, its a well known fact that the person without kids and no tax benefits will still have much more wealth than those with both.
Also if your argument is based on fairness, isn't it inherently unfair that without tax benefits and other federal programs to aid parents raising children for lower income households that it would be essentially impossible in developed nations?
Economically denying someone the right to have children is far more unfair than denying someone who will come out richer anyways the right to have a tax break they dont need.
Social justice != fairness.
And yeah, if you can deny access to culture for people with lower income you can also deny them having a children if they cannot afford raising one.
You don't have to convert anything to euros as I'm using dollars for more often than them, but don't think that cost of raising child being high are unique to the States. It's generally a big cost as the child has similar cost of living to you and the harder it is to sustain where you live the harder it is for you to help others who depend on you.
When I was working last summer I was earning 10PLN or $2.68/hour. Cost of raising a child here is 190,000PLN where it's $245,000 in the States according to U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But that doesn't count in everything that's not necessary that child might want like Game Boys etc. which are even more expensive here than in the States despites pay being lower so I'd say those numbers are pretty close compared to a median pay.