In one game he did almost 15k damage in total and two thirds of it are on the grenade launcher. It is safe to assume that the sticky launcher damage comes from the kritzkrieg used in that game because despite doing only around 5k on stickies in comparison to the almost 10k on pipes he almost has the same amount of kills on both weapons. So you are telling me his gameplay is completely legit because he did play demo in some games?
http://logs.tf/2269242#76561198424844078

There is absolutely nothing stopping you from trying to establish something unique in traditional 6s. The only problem is that there is a high chance that it won't be viable but still annoying to play against. Also, there is only so much shit you can make available before a match of 6s turns into an unorganized, convoluted shitfest. I don't think you'd consider Overwatch a good game to watch, but that is pretty much what TF2 would be with all that no restriction stuff and I don't think we can afford to make 6s even more complicated if spectators that do not play it can't wrap their head around the whole Ubercharge business. Apart from that I'm pretty sure even in Overwatch they form a composition that is just inherently superior to any other.

Are you even reading? The "banning unlocks we don't want is a bad thing" bit refers to the belief that valve is more interested in supporting competitive tf2 if we do things like remove classlimits and stop banning unlocks. You know, the reason why the no restriction league is a thing. Now, again, I ask: why is it ok to take the matters into your own hands in this case? Badlands isn't a very popular map, but its an official one and it doesnt matter if it is originally community made. Why are you not replacing it with another official 5cp map, like vanguard for example? Are you implying that the map that (might) replace badlands will be added in the game for sure, so its no problem? Your passive aggressiveness isn't helping me understand why deviating from the original vanilla game is okay in this case.

I'm pretty aware and this does apply to most weapons aswell (apart from the stats). Genuinely curious why banning unlocks we don't want is a bad thing but doing the same for maps isn't

So us banning unlocks will make valve mad and stop competitive support but banning official maps and taking the matters into our own hands won't? Excuse me?

You are comparing Swi's 30 minute performance to hamahams 4 minute golden cap, which ends after the first round. That is like saying person X is just as good as Usain Bolt because they can run at the same speed, even though Usain Bolt can do it for the full 100m.

I get it though.The rulebook needs some (meaningful) adjustments asap. LR knew the other team is breaking the rules by having Swi on scout but chose to wait until after the game and I know exactly what was going on in their mumble: "if we beat them it's fine but if we lose we can just get the default". If people accept to play the entire match after the first mid this rule just shouldn't apply anymore. They knew exactly what they were getting into and they did nothing to prevent it even though they could have.

I mean Swi gave everyone on the other team the McDickin' on scout
Although the rematch is a pretty good idea to fix this clusterfuck imo

Se7en wins Premiership
Sandbaggers win every other division

https://imgur.com/dwKI6cC

ETF2L S32 Mid Happenings/Discussion

imgur.com/a/sOZnRoC

https://www.twitch.tv/gazkoigne
streaming scrims and pugs
Name just "Gaz" if possible
Thanks

https://imgur.com/a/aKIiFCg

I wonder what the excuse is gonna be when this turns out to be completely unplayable as a competitive format