Starry I think you're missing the point -- if we switched off of ESEA to some other F2P league, a ton of teams would die for pretty much no benefit. Would TF2 go on? Sure. But you're not clearly outlining the benefits of this new league that make it so much superior to ESEA.
ESEA:
- They have prize pools
- They have admins on duty and respond to support tickets within a timely manner
- They have a structure and an anti-cheat system in place
- It costs money to play
- They don't care about growing the TF2 league or marketing it.
This new F2P league:
- They have no prize pools
- They have admins on duty and respond to support tickets within a timely manner... maybe
- They have a structure and an anti-cheat system in place... hopefully
- It costs no money to play
- They care about growing the TF2 league and marketing it.
If the only difference between these two leagues is paying or not paying, playing for money or not playing for money, then just play UGC. Is marketing helpful? Sure but who is going to do it?
What's the point in killing ESEA if everyone is fine paying money. Is ESEA siphoning off that money for their own benefit? Probably, although some invite players have said (or maybe spread rumors) that ESEA operates TF2 at a loss. Is it worth the switch and potentially hurting the NA game? Probably not.
Give some concrete, real reasons as to what this new league would do that is simply not possible with ESEA. It might sound like I'm against this switch but I actually think it's an amazing idea if someone actually cares enough to execute and see it through to the finish line.